Cited by 2Proteins in Food SystemsUltrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaMicrobial Inactivation Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thermal effects of sonication promote non-covalent amorphous aggregation of in-situ Pinto bean protein

Open access

Abstract

Hydration is a critical pre-processing step in bean processing, as it softens the seeds for consumption and reduces anti-nutritional factors. Conventional thermal hydration is energy-intensive and has a high carbon footprint. Ultrasound-assisted hydration has been proposed as a greener alternative, yet its effects on in-situ proteins remain unclear, particularly given the complex interplay of thermal and physical sonication effects. To address this, we compared four different hydration strategies for pinto beans: isothermal hydration at 25 °C, ultrasound-assisted hydration with and without temperature control, and high-temperature thermal hydration. Isolated proteins were characterised by chromatography, electrophoresis, calorimetry, and infrared spectroscopy, and their functional properties were evaluated using rheology and texture analysis. Isothermal hydration produced the highest protein purity and the strongest gels. Temperature-controlled ultrasound resulted in weaker gels despite similar molecular features, likely due to co-extracted matrix components inhibiting protein–protein crosslinking. Ultrasound without temperature control and high-temperature hydration generated proteins with higher solubility and firmer textures but dominated by large non-covalent aggregates that acted as inert fillers. The contrasting outcomes of the two ultrasound treatments underscore the importance of thermal management and the need for mechanistic understanding under realistic processing…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2026.112514

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Aiking, 2020, The next protein transition, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 105, 515, 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.008 · DOI
  2. Aimutis, 2022, Plant-based proteins: The good, bad, and ugly, Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 13, 1, 10.1146/annurev-food-092221-041723 · DOI
  3. Badjona, 2025, Gelation and rheological properties of ultrasound-extracted faba bean protein: A comparative study with commercial plant proteins, Food Hydrocolloids, 162, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110997 · DOI
  4. Byanju, 2020, Effect of high-power sonication pretreatment on extraction and some physicochemical properties of proteins from chickpea, kidney bean, and soybean, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 145, 712, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.118 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cao, 2020, Design principles of food gels, Nature Food, 1, 106, 10.1038/s43016-019-0009-x · DOI
  6. Cao, 2025, Enhancing emulsification properties of pea protein isolate: Impact of heat treatment and soy hull polysaccharides on conformational modification and stability, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 298, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140106 · DOI
  7. Devkota, 2023, Structural and thermal characterization of protein isolates from Australian lupin varieties as affected by processing conditions, Foods, 12, 10.3390/foods12050908 · DOI
  8. Dobson, 2003, Protein folding and misfolding, Nature, 426, 884, 10.1038/nature02261 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Faber, 2017, Describing the firmness, springiness and rubberiness of food gels using fractional calculus. Part II: Measurements on semi-hard cheese, Food Hydrocolloids, 62, 325, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.06.038 · DOI
  10. Fuertez, 2025, A testing procedure for evaluating the steeping quality of incoming corn for the wet-milling process, Food and Bioproducts Processing, 153, 451, 10.1016/j.fbp.2025.07.017 · DOI
  11. Gao, 2022, Structure characteristics and functionality of water-soluble fraction from high-intensity ultrasound treated pea protein isolate, Food Hydrocolloids, 125, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107409 · DOI
  12. Ghafoor, 2014, Ultrasound assisted hydration of navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 21, 409, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.05.016 · DOI
  13. Guo, 2012, Limited aggregation behavior of beta-conglycinin and its terminating effect on glycinin aggregation during heating at pH 7.0, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60, 3782, 10.1021/jf300409y · DOI
  14. Hopf, 2024, Techno‐functional properties of dry and wet fractionated pulse protein ingredients, Legume science, 6, 10.1002/leg3.70005 · DOI
  15. Jackson, 1995, Corn Wet Milling: Separation Chemistry and Technology, 38
  16. Kamani, 2024, Determining the influence of fava bean pre-processing on extractability and functional quality of protein isolates, Food Chemistry X, 21, 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101200 · DOI
  17. Klost, 2020, Effect of protein aggregation on rheological properties of pea protein gels, Food Hydrocolloids, 108, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106036 · DOI
  18. Kumar, 2025, Ultrasound-assisted hydration offers a novel approach to anneal in-situ pinto bean starch, Carbohydrate Polymers, 360, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123602 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kumar, 2023, Innovations in legume processing: Ultrasound-based strategies for enhanced legume hydration and processing, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 139, 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104122 · DOI
  20. Kumar, 2025, Thermal energy generated during ultrasonication dominates pinto bean hydration, Journal of Food Engineering, 385, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.112255 · DOI
  21. Los, 2018, Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): Whole seeds with complex chemical composition, Current Opinion in Food Science, 19, 63, 10.1016/j.cofs.2018.01.010 · DOI
  22. Loveday, 2024, Protein isolates made in the laboratory versus the factory: A case study with mung bean and chickpea, Sustainable Food Proteins, 2, 89, 10.1002/sfp2.1027 · DOI
  23. Miano, 2018, The hydration of grains: A critical review from description of phenomena to process improvements, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 17, 352, 10.1111/1541-4337.12328 · DOI
  24. Miano, 2018, The ultrasound assisted hydration as an opportunity to incorporate nutrients into grains, Food Research International, 106, 928, 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.006 · DOI
  25. Mills, 2003, Thermally induced structural changes in glycinin, the 11S globulin of soya bean (Glycine max)--an in situ spectroscopic study, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1648, 105, 10.1016/S1570-9639(03)00114-6 · DOI
  26. Miranda-Valdez, 2025, pyRheo: An open-source Python package for complex rheology, Digital Discovery, 4, 1075, 10.1039/D5DD00021A · DOI
  27. Pelgrom, 2013, Dry fractionation for production of functional pea protein concentrates, Food Research International, 53, 232, 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.05.004 · DOI
  28. Rausch, 2019, Wet milling: The basis for corn biorefineries, Corn, 501, 10.1016/B978-0-12-811971-6.00018-8 · DOI
  29. Rui, 2011, Comparative study of the composition and thermal properties of protein isolates prepared from nine Phaseolus vulgaris legume varieties, Food Research International, 44, 2497, 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.01.008 · DOI
  30. Schmidt, 2022, Upscaling of alkaline pea protein extraction from dry milled and pre-treated peas from laboratory to pilot scale: Optimization of process parameters for higher protein yields, Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 16, 4904, 10.1007/s11694-022-01558-0 · DOI
  31. Schmitt, 2011, Protein/polysaccharide complexes and coacervates in food systems, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 167, 63, 10.1016/j.cis.2010.10.001 · DOI
  32. Shrestha, 2023, Rheological and textural properties of heat-induced gels from pulse protein isolates: Lentil, mungbean and yellow pea, Food Hydrocolloids, 143, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108904 · DOI
  33. Shrestha, 2023, Comparative study on molecular and higher-order structures of legume seed protein isolates: Lentil, mungbean and yellow pea, Food Chemistry, 411, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135464 · DOI
  34. Tan, 2014, A comparative study of physicochemical characteristics and functionalities of pinto bean protein isolate (PBPI) against the soybean protein isolate (SPI) after the extraction optimisation, Food Chemistry, 152, 447, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.008 · DOI
  35. Tang, 2011, A comparative study of physicochemical and conformational properties in three vicilins from phaseolus legumes: Implications for the structure–function relationship, Food Hydrocolloids, 25, 315, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.06.009 · DOI
  36. Wagner, 2017, Quantifying the consistency and rheology of liquid foods using fractional calculus, Food Hydrocolloids, 69, 242, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.01.036 · DOI
  37. Willett, 2019, Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT-Lancet commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems, Lancet, 393, 447, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Xiong, 2024, Sonication-mediated modulation of macronutrient structure and digestibility in chickpea, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 106, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106904 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Zhang, 2025, Effect of salt extraction on composition, structure, and thermal properties of pea protein, Food Chemistry, 486, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144650 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, G., Sharma, K., Devkota, L., & Dhital, S.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
Food Hydrocolloids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-06
Volume
175
Pages
112514
ISSN
0268-005X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7126095054
Cited by
2
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Food Hydrocolloids (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Government of Western Australia
  • Australian Research Council (LP210200616)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Acoustics and Ultrasonics › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
Keywords
protein solubility, protein gels, gel texture, temperature control, protein functional properties, legume processing, antinutritional factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review