Cited by 15

Sonication-mediated modulation of macronutrient structure and digestibility in chickpea

Xiong, Weiyan, Kumar, Gaurav, Zhang, Bin, Dhital, Sushil·2024·Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106904

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. [1]Chavan P. Sharma P. Sharma S.R. Mittal T.C. Jaiswal A.K. Application of high-intensity ultrasound to improve food processing efficiency: A review Foods 11 1 2022 10.3390/foods11010122 PMC8750622 35010248 · DOI
  2. [2]Hoo D.Y. Low Z.L. Low D.Y.S. Tang S.Y. Manickam S. Tan K.W. Ultrasonic cavitation: An effective cleaner and greener intensification technology in the extraction and surface modification of nanocellulose Ultrason. Sonochem. 90 2022 106176 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106176 PMC9519792 36174272 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Flores-Silva P.C. Roldan-Cruz C.A. Chavez-Esquivel G. Vernon-Carter E.J. Bello-Perez L.A. Alvarez-Ramirez J. In vitro digestibility of ultrasound-treated corn starch Starch - Stärke 69 9–10 2017 1700040 10.1002/star.201700040 · DOI
  4. [4]Monroy Y. Rivero S. Garcia M.A. Microstructural and techno-functional properties of cassava starch modified by ultrasound Ultrason. Sonochem. 42 2018 795 804 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.12.048 29429733 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Wei Y. Li G. Zhu F. Impact of long-term ultrasound treatment on structural and physicochemical properties of starches differing in granule size Carbohydr. Polym. 320 2023 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121195 37659789 · DOI
  6. [6]Yang Y.W. Kong X. Zheng Y. Sun W. Chen S. Liu D. Controlled ultrasound treatments modify the morphology and physical properties of rice starch rather than the fine structure Ultrason. Sonochem. 59 2019 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104709 31421615 · DOI
  7. [7]Zhu F. Impact of ultrasound on structure, physicochemical properties, modifications, and applications of starch Trends Food Sci. Technol. 43 1 2015 1 17 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [8]Hu A. Li L. Effect mechanism of ultrasound pretreatment on fibrillation Kinetics, physicochemical properties and structure characteristics of soy protein isolate nanofibrils 105741 Ultrason. Sonochem. 78 2021 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105741 PMC8455861 34537680 · DOI
  9. [9]Hu H. Wu J. Li-Chan E.C.Y. Zhu L. Zhang F. Xu X. Effects of ultrasound on structural and physical properties of soy protein isolate (SPI) dispersions Food Hydrocoll. 30 2 2013 647 655 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.08.001 · DOI
  10. [10]Jiang L. Wang J. Li Y. Wang Z. Liang J. Wang R. Effects of ultrasound on the structure and physical properties of black bean protein isolates Food Res. Int. 62 2014 595 601 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.04.022 · DOI
  11. [11]Li R. Xiong Y.L. Ultrasound-induced structural modification and thermal properties of oat protein LWT 149 2021 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111861 111861 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [12]Lo B. Kasapis S. Farahnaky A. Effect of low frequency ultrasound on the functional characteristics of isolated lupin protein 107345 Food Hydrocoll. 124 2022 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107345 · DOI
  13. [13]Sha L. Xiong Y.L. Comparative structural and emulsifying properties of ultrasound-treated pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein isolate and the legumin and vicilin fractions Food Res. Int. 156 2022 111179 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111179 35651040 · DOI
  14. [14]Su J. Cavaco-Paulo A. Effect of ultrasound on protein functionality 105653 Ultrason. Sonochem. 76 2021 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105653 PMC8253904 34198127 · DOI
  15. [15]Foschi M.L. Juan M. Pascual B. Pascual-Seva N. Effects of high intensity ultrasound stimulation on the germination performance of caper seeds Plants (basel) 12 12 2023 10.3390/plants12122379 PMC10302670 37376004 · DOI
  16. [16]Chen J. Shao F. Igbokwe C.J. Duan Y. Cai M. Ma H. Ultrasound treatments improve germinability of soybean seeds: The key role of working frequency 106434 Ultrason. Sonochem. 96 2023 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106434 PMC10197015 37187120 · DOI
  17. [17]Chiu K.-Y. Changes in microstructure, germination, sprout Growth, phytochemical and microbial quality of ultrasonication treated Adzuki bean seeds Agronomy 11 6 2021 1093 10.3390/agronomy11061093 · DOI
  18. [18]Miano A.C. Pereira J.D.C. Castanha N. Junior M. Augusto P.E.D. Enhancing mung bean hydration using the ultrasound technology: description of mechanisms and impact on its germination and main components Sci. Rep. 6 2016 38996 10.1038/srep38996 27991545 PMC5171542 · DOI
  19. [19]Dhital S. Bhattarai R.R. Gorham J. Gidley M.J. Intactness of cell wall structure controls the in vitro digestion of starch in legumes Food Funct. 7 3 2016 1367 1379 10.1039/c5fo01104c 26786854 · DOI
  20. [20]Gartaula G. Dhital S. Pleming D. Gidley M.J. Isolation of wheat endosperm cell walls: effects of non-endosperm flour components on structural analyses J. Cereal Sci. 74 2017 165 173 10.1016/j.jcs.2017.02.004 · DOI
  21. [21]Shrestha S. van 't Hag L. Haritos V. Dhital S. Comparative study on molecular and higher-order structures of legume seed protein isolates: Lentil, mungbean and yellow pea Food Chem. 411 2023 135464 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135464 36669335 · DOI
  22. [22]Zu-Man D. Yu-Long Z. Chun-Yang T. Chuang L. Jia-Qin F. Qiang H. Construction of blackberry polysaccharide nano-selenium particles: Structure features and regulation effects of glucose/lipid metabolism in HepG2 cells Food Res. Internat. 2024 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114428 114428 38763678 · DOI
  23. [23]Salvador L.D. Suganuma T. Kitahara K. Tanoue H. Ichiki M. Monosaccharide composition of sweetpotato fiber and cell wall polysaccharides from sweetpotato, cassava, and potato analyzed by the high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection method J. Agricul. Food Chem. 48 8 2000 3448 3454 10.1021/jf991089z 10956132 · DOI
  24. [24]Saeman J.F. Kinetics of wood saccharification - hydrolysis of cellulose and decomposition of sugars in dilute acid at high temperature Ind. Eng. Chem. 37 1 1945 43 52 10.1021/ie50421a009 · DOI
  25. [25]Blumenkrantz N. Asboe-Hansen G. New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids Anal. Biochem. 54 2 1973 484 489 10.1016/0003-2697(73)90377-1 4269305 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [26]Li H. Gidley M.J. Dhital S. Wall porosity in isolated cells from food plants: Implications for nutritional functionality Food Chem. 279 2019 416 425 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.024 30611509 · DOI
  27. [27]Brodkorb A. Egger L. Alminger M. Alvito P. Assuncao R. Ballance S. INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion Nat. Protocols 14 4 2019 991 1014 10.1038/s41596-018-0119-1 30886367 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [28]Xiong W. Zhang B. Huang Q. Li C. Pletsch E.A. Fu X. Variation in the rate and extent of starch digestion is not determined by the starch structural features of cooked whole pulses Food Hydrocoll. 83 2018 340 347 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.05.022 · DOI
  29. [29]Esclapez M.D. García-Pérez J.V. Mulet A. Cárcel J.A. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of natural products Food Eng. Rev. 3 2 2011 108 120 10.1007/s12393-011-9036-6 · DOI
  30. [30]Veillet S. Tomao V. Chemat F. Ultrasound assisted maceration: An original procedure for direct aromatisation of olive oil with basil Food Chem. 123 3 2010 905 911 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.05.005 · DOI
  31. [31]Jayaveni S. Nithyanandham K. Rose C. In vitro secretion of zymogens by bovine pancreatic acini and ultra-structural analysis of exocytosis Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 5 2016 237 245 10.1016/j.bbrep.2015.12.009 28955829 PMC5600341 · DOI
  32. [32]Panya F. Haser R. Pierrot M. Frey M. Astier J.P. The three-dimensional structure of α-amylase from porcine pancreas at 5 Å resolution–the active-site location Acta Crystallogr. B36 1980 416 421 10.1107/S0567740880003378 · DOI
  33. [33]Zobel H.F. Starch crystal transformations and their industrial importance Starch - Stärke 40 1 1988 1 7 10.1002/star.19880400102 · DOI
  34. [34]Hoover R. Ratnayake W.S. Starch characteristics of black bean, chick pea, lentil, navy bean and pinto bean cultivars grown in Canada Food Chem. 78 4 2002 489 498 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00163-2 · DOI
  35. [35]Zhang B. Wang K. Hasjim J. Li E. Flanagan B.M. Gidley M.J. Freeze-drying changes the structure and digestibility of B-polymorphic starches J. Agricul. Food Chem. 62 7 2014 1482 1491 10.1021/jf405196m 24471496 · DOI
  36. [36]Luo Z. Fu X. He X. Luo F. Gao Q. Yu S. Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the physicochemical properties of maize starches differing in amylose content Starch - Stärke 60 11 2008 646 653 10.1002/star.200800014 · DOI
  37. [37]Bernardino-Nicanor A. Acosta-Garcia G. Guemes-Vera N. Montanez-Soto J.L. de Los Angeles Vivar-Vera M. Gonzalez-Cruz L. Fourier transform infrared and Raman spectroscopic study of the effect of the thermal treatment and extraction methods on the characteristics of ayocote bean starches J. Food Sci. Technol. 54 4 2017 933 943 10.1007/s13197-016-2370-1 28303044 PMC5336448 · DOI
  38. [38]Cui R. Zhu F. Effect of ultrasound on structural and physicochemical properties of sweetpotato and wheat flours Ultrason. Sonochem. 66 2020 105118 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105118 32272332 · DOI
  39. [39]Sujka M. Ultrasonic modification of starch - Impact on granules porosity Ultrason. Sonochem. 37 2017 424 429 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.02.001 28427652 · DOI
  40. [40]Mohammad Amini A. Razavi S.M. Mortazavi S.A. Morphological, physicochemical, and viscoelastic properties of sonicated corn starch Carbohydr. Polym. 122 282–292 2015 1 https://doi.org/0.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.020 25817670
  41. [41]Chandrapala J. Zisu B. Palmer M. Kentish S. Ashokkumar M. Effects of ultrasound on the thermal and structural characteristics of proteins in reconstituted whey protein concentrate Ultrason. Sonochem. 18 5 2011 951 957 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.12.016 21262585 · DOI
  42. [42]Liang Q. Ren X. Qu W. Zhang X. Cheng Y. Ma H. The impact of ultrasound duration on the structure of β-lactoglobulin J. Food Eng. 292 2021 110365 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110365 · DOI
  43. [43]Huang L. Ding X. Dai C. Ma H. Changes in the structure and dissociation of soybean protein isolate induced by ultrasound-assisted acid pretreatment Food Chem. 232 2017 727 732 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.077 28490134 · DOI
  44. [44]Xiong W. Devkota L. Flanagan M.F. Gu Z. Zhang B. Dhital S. Plant cell wall composition modulates the gut microbiota and metabolites in in-vitro fermentation Carbohydr. Polym. 316 2023 121074 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121074 37321749 · DOI
  45. [46]Wang H. Chen J. Ren P. Zhang Y. Omondi Onyango S. Ultrasound irradiation alters the spatial structure and improves the antioxidant activity of the yellow tea polysaccharide Ultrason. Sonochem. 70 2021 105355 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105355 PMC7786635 33007535 · DOI
  46. [47]Li S. Wang Y. Dun W. Han W. Xu C. Sun Q. Effect of ultrasonic degradation on the physicochemical property and bioactivity of polysaccharide produced by Chaetomium globosum CGMCC 6882 Front. Nutr. 9 2022 941524 10.3389/fnut.2022.941524 PMC9344072 35928848 · DOI
  47. [48]Dou Z. Zhang Y. Tang W. Deng Q. Hu B. Chen X. Ultrasonic effects on the degradation kinetics, structural characteristics and protective effects on hepatocyte lipotoxicity induced by palmitic acid of Pueraria Lobata polysaccharides Ultrason. Sonochem. 101 2023 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106652 PMC10597800 37865008 · DOI
  48. [49]Debnath B. Haldar D. Purkait M.K. A critical review on the techniques used for the synthesis and applications of crystalline cellulose derived from agricultural wastes and forest residues Carbohydr. Polym. 273 2021 118537 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118537 34560949 · DOI
  49. [50]Ilham Z. Biomass classification and characterization for conversion to biofuels Yusup S. Rashidi N.A. Value-Chain of Biofuels 2022 Elsevier 69 87
  50. [51]Zhang L. Ye X. Ding T. Sun X. Xu Y. Liu D. Ultrasound effects on the degradation kinetics, structure and rheological properties of apple pectin Ultrason. Sonochem. 20 1 2013 222 231 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.07.021 22982008 · DOI
  51. [52]Shi Q. Zou M. Song M. Wang J. Zhao H. Xiong S. Effects of ultrasonic on structure, chain conformation and morphology of pectin extracted from Premna microphylla Turcz Carbohydr. Polym. 296 2022 119949 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119949 36088029 · DOI
  52. [53]Xiao J. Chen X. Zhan Q. Zhong L. Hu Q. Zhao L. Effects of ultrasound on the degradation kinetics, physicochemical properties and prebiotic activity of Flammulina velutipes polysaccharide Ultrason. Sonochem. 82 2022 105901 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105901 PMC8799604 34973579 · DOI
  53. [54]Xu Y. Zhang J. He J. Liu T. Guo X. Influences of ultrasonic treatments on the structure and antioxidant properties of sugar beet pectin Foods 12 5 2023 10.3390/foods12051020 PMC10001074 36900538 · DOI
  54. [55]Dhital S. Shelat K.J. Shrestha A.K. Gidley M.J. Heterogeneity in maize starch granule internal architecture deduced from diffusion of fluorescent dextran probes Carbohydr. Polym. 93 2 2013 365 373 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.12.017 23499070 · DOI
  55. [56]Wu C. Dhital S. Mo Y. Fu X. Huang Q. Zhang B. Salt adopted in soaking solution controls the yield and starch digestion kinetics of intact pulse cotyledon cells Carbohydr. Polym. 314 2023 120949 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120949 37173051 · DOI
  56. [57]Nowacka M. Wedzik M. Effect of ultrasound treatment on microstructure, colour and carotenoid content in fresh and dried carrot tissue Appl. Acoust. 103 2016 163 171 10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.06.011 · DOI
  57. [58]Pieczywek P.M. Kozioł A. Konopacka D. Cybulska J. Zdunek A. Changes in cell wall stiffness and microstructure in ultrasonically treated apple J. Food Eng. 197 2017 1 8 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.10.028 · DOI
  58. [59]Umana M. Calahorro M. Eim V. Rossello C. Simal S. Measurement of microstructural changes promoted by ultrasound application on plant materials with different porosity Ultrason. Sonochem. 88 2022 106087 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106087 PMC9256647 35785623 · DOI
  59. [60]Xue F. Li C. Effects of ultrasound assisted cell wall disruption on physicochemical properties of camellia bee pollen protein isolates Ultrason. Sonochem. 92 2023 106249 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106249 PMC9712773 36459901 · DOI
  60. [61]Shchukin D.G. Skorb E. Belova V. Mohwald H. Ultrasonic cavitation at solid surfaces Adv. Mater. 23 17 2011 1922 1934 10.1002/adma.201004494 21337429 · DOI
  61. [62]Kumar G. Le D.T. Durco J. Cianciosi S. Devkota L. Dhital S. Innovations in legume processing: Ultrasound-based strategies for enhanced legume hydration and processing Trends Food Sci. Technol. 139 2023 104122 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104122 · DOI

Cited by

Authors
Xiong, W., Kumar, G., Zhang, B., & Dhital, S.
Venue
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
106
Pages
106904
ISSN
1350-4177
Cited by
15
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Australian Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review