The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness
Granovetter, M. (1985) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228311 · Cited by 28,745
National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning
(2010) · Anthem Press eBooks · doi:10.7135/upo9781843318903 · Cited by 6,032
National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning
Johnson, B. (1992) · Cited by 3,775
Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation
Howells, J. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005 · Cited by 2,053
Hinkemeyer, M. T. (1971) · The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas · doi:10.1080/00098655.1971.11478291 · Cited by 1,835
Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition
Rogers, E. M. (1982) · Cited by 914
A system failure framework for innovation policy design
Klein Woolthuis, R., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002 · Cited by 875
KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES AS CO-PRODUCERS OF INNOVATION
HERTOG, P. D. (2000) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s136391960000024x · Cited by 855
Cited by
Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems
Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N. (2011) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2011.536344 · Cited by 450
Self-citationSchaeffer, V., & Matt, M. (2016) · Entrepreneurship & Regional Development · doi:10.1080/08985626.2016.1247915 · Cited by 122
Conti, C., Hall, A., Kok, K., Olsson, P., Moore, M.-L., Kremen, C., Laila, A., Gordon, L. J., Barnhill, A., te Wierik, S., et al. (2025) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101178 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C.
- Venue
- Food Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 260-276
- ISSN
- 0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078994995
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 48.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.001
- The paper
- Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2008). Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries. Food Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.