Cited by 108Economic and Environmental ValuationConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingOrganic Food and Agriculture

The roles of human values and generalized trust on stated preferences when food is labeled with environmental footprints: insights from Germany

Grebitus, Carola, Steiner, Bodo, Veeman, Michele·2015·Food Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.06.011

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grebitus, C., Steiner, B., & Veeman, M.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Grebitus, Carola
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
52
Pages
84-91
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009975241
Cited by
107
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
20.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
Keywords
human values, generalized trust, stated preference, consumer choice, potato, value systems, sustainable food consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review