Cited by 240Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsEconomic and Environmental ValuationOrganic Food and Agriculture

Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods: Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story?

Open access
Stefani, Gianluca, Romano, Donato, Cavicchi, Alessio·2006·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

The Region of origin of food products affects consumer valuation in two different ways. First, origin can act as a quality cue hinting to other characteristics of the good. Secondly, origin can affect directly the value of food due to its symbolic or affective role. This study was carried out in order to investigate the direct effect of geographical origin when the size of the area of origin shrinks and its definition becomes more precise. A valuation experiment was designed to assess the impact of origin on consumer evaluation and to analyse how it relates to WTP and hedonic scores. A well-known specialty food-spelt-that originates from three concentric areas-Garfagnana (a small valley of the Apennines), Tuscany and Italy-was chosen as a case study. Both hedonic and monetary evaluations were elicited from 77 subjects after blind tasting condition, looking at labels only and finally tasting a labelled product. Results reveal that, in the case of spelt, the narrower and more precisely defined the area of origin the higher the quality expectation of consumers supporting the role of origin as a quality cue. A direct impact of origin on willingness to pay was also found.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.010

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cramer, D. (1994). Introducing statistics for social research. London: Routledge.
  2. Guerrero, L. (2001). Marketing PDO and PGI. In L. Frewer, E. Risvik, & H. Schifferstein (Eds.), Food, people and society (pp. 281-298). Berlin: Springer.
  3. Scifferstein, H. (1997). Perceptual and imaginary mixture in chemo- sensation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 23(1), 278-288.
  4. Von Alvensleben, R., & Schrader, S. K. (1998). Consumer attitudes towards regional food products. A case study for Northern Germany. AIR CAT workshop consumer attitudes toward typical foods, Dijon, 22-10-1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stefani, G., Romano, D., & Cavicchi, A.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Stefani, Gianluca
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
17
Issue
1-2
Pages
53-62
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041164768
Cited by
240
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • U-PAD Unimc - Open Digital Publications (University of Macerata) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
Keywords
geographical origin, specialty foods, spelt wheat, willingness to pay, customer expectations, quality cues, hedonic pricing, sensory properties, consumer valuation, blind tasting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review