Cited by 40Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Long-term acceptability and choice of teas differing in sweetness

Chung, Seo-Jin, Vickers, Zata·2007·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

We measured people's choice and changes in choice of three types of tea, each at a low and an optimum level of sweetness. Twenty-eight tea drinkers participated in an initial taste test session and 20 additional consumption sessions. During the first session they tasted the six tea samples, ranked them in order of preference, and otherwise familiarized themselves with the samples prior to the long-term experiment. In each of the 20 consumption sessions they selected a tea, drank it, rated how well they liked it, how tired they were of it, and their satisfaction with having chosen it. We observed four choice patterns: constant-switcher, acquired-liker, non-switcher, and systematic-switcher. Over the 20 sessions the liking of the low-sweet tea increased and the tiredness ratings of the optimum-sweet tea increased. These changes, however, did not increase the frequency with which they chose the low sweet teas. Initial liking significantly predicted choice for about half the panelists.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.03.011

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, S.-J., & Vickers, Z.
Affiliations
  • Seoul Women's University (KR)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Vickers, Zata
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
963-974
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061362983
Cited by
40
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
tea, consumer choice, liking, taste preference, long-term consumption, fatigue, satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review