The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vitro starch digestibility and estimated glycemic index of chemically modified corn starches
Abstract
Normal corn starch was chemically modified by oxidation, acetylation, hydroxypropylation, and cross-linking, and the digestibility and glycemic indices (GI) of these modified starches were examined by in vitro hydrolysis using pancreatic -amylase. During the early stage of hydrolysis (up to 60 min) with prime (ungelatinized) starches, the modified starches were hydrolyzed at greater extents than the unmodified starches. However, at the late stage of hydrolysis (after 3 h), the modified starches showed lower degrees of hydrolysis than the unmodified starch. The amount of resistant starch (RS) in prime starches were 23.4%, 35.1%, 34.2%, and 13.9% in the acetylated, oxidized, hydroxypropylated, and cross-linked starches, respectively, whereas the unmodified starch contained 11.9%. The amount of slowly digestible starch (SDS) was decreased as the RS content was increased by the modification, indicating that some of the SDS transformed to RS. By gelatinization, all the starches, regardless of type of modification, were more quickly hydrolyzed and reached maximum levels within 20 min. Like the prime starches, the modified starches contained higher contents of undigested starches after gelatinization. The modifications except cross-linking reduced rapidly digestible starch (RDS) content but increased the RS content when the starches were gelatinized. The hydroxypropylated starch had the lowest GI values, which were estimated from the hydrolysis profiles (70.6 and 86.2 in prime and gelatinized states, respectively), whereas the GI values of cross-linked starch were similar to those of the unmodified starch. Therefore, chemical substitution such as hydroxypropylation and acetylation, and oxidation can be used to reduce the starch digestibility and raise the RS content.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some modifications of starches can alter the susceptibility to enzymic hydrolysis and/or their gelatinization behavior (Han and BeMiller, 2007; Chung et al., 2008; Hwang et al., 2009).”
From Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health (2017) · cites this paper as Chung et al., 2008
Citations
Cites
High-glycemic Index Foods, Hunger, and Obesity: Is There a Connection?
Roberts, S. B. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2000.tb01855.x · Cited by 356 · cited 2×
“Current dietary guidelines focus on lowering dietary fat and increasing complex carbohydrate intake, such as starch and dietary fiber (Roberts, 2000).”
BackgroundWolever, T. M. S., & Mehling, C. (2002) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn2002568 · Cited by 214
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Björck, 1989, A study of native and chemically modified potato starch. Part II: Digestibility in the rat intestinal tract, Starch, 41, S128, 10.1002/star.19890410403 · DOI
- Brand-Miller, 2007, The glycemic index as a measure of health and nutritional quality: An Australian perspective, Cereal Foods World, 52, 41
- CFR (2006). Code of Federal Regulations. Food starch modified. Title 21. Chapter 1, Part 172, Sec. 172.892. In Food additives permitted for direct addition to food for human consumption. Washington, DC:US GPO.
- Chung, 2006, Effect of partial gelatinization and retrogradation on the enzymatic digestion of waxy rice starch, Journal of Cereal Science, 43, 353, 10.1016/j.jcs.2005.12.001 · DOI
- Crosbie, 1991, The relationship between starch swelling properties, paste viscosity and boiled noodle quality in wheat flours, Journal of Cereal Science, 13, 145, 10.1016/S0733-5210(09)80031-3 · DOI
- Englyst, 1992, Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46, S33
- Goni, 1997, A starch hydrolysis procedure to estimate glycemic index, Nutrition Research, 17, 427, 10.1016/S0271-5317(97)00010-9 · DOI
- Granfeldt, 1992, An in vitro procedure based on chewing to predict metabolic responses to starch in cereal and legume products, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46, 649
- Han, 2007, Preparation and physical characteristics of slowly digesting modified food starches, Carbohydrate Polymers, 67, 366, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoover, 1988, Effects of hydroxypropylation on thermal properties, starch digestibility and freeze–thaw stability of field pea (Pisum sativum cv Trapper), Starch, 40, 383, 10.1002/star.19880401005 · DOI
- Hoover, 1985, A comparative study of the effect of acetylation on starches of Phaseolus vulgaris biotypes, Starch, 37, 397, 10.1002/star.19850371202 · DOI
- Hoover, 1986, Effect of cross-linking on functional properties of legume starches, Starch, 38, 149, 10.1002/star.19860380502 · DOI
- Hoover, 2003, In vitro and in vivo hydrolysis of legume starches by α-amylase and resistant starch formation in legumes – A review, Carbohydrate Polymers, 54, 401, 10.1016/S0144-8617(03)00180-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Jenkins, 2007, The glycemic index: Looking back 25 years, Cereal Foods World, 52, 50
- Jenkins, 1982, Effect of processing on digestibility and the blood glucose responses: A study of lentils, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 36, 1093, 10.1093/ajcn/36.6.1093 · DOI
- Johnson, 1969, Spectrophotometric determination of the hydroxypropyl group in starch ethers, Analytical Chemistry, 41, 859, 10.1021/ac60275a024 · DOI
- Lehmann, 2007, Slowly digestible starch – Its structure and health implications: A review, Trends in Food Science and Technology, 18, 346, 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.02.009 · DOI
- Liu, 1997, Physical properties and enzymatic digestibility of acetylated ae, wx, and normal maize starch, Carbohydrate Polymers, 34, 283, 10.1016/S0144-8617(97)00130-6 · DOI
- Östergård, 1988, A study of native and chemically modified potato starch. Part I: Analysis and enzymic availability in vitro, Starch, 40, 58, 10.1002/star.19880400206 · DOI
- Raben, 1997, Acetylation of or β-cyclodextrin addition to potato starch: Beneficial effect on glucose metabolism and appetite sensations, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 66, 304, 10.1093/ajcn/66.2.304 · DOI
- Sajilata, 2006, Resistant starch – A review, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 5, 1, 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2006.tb00076.x · DOI · Paper page
- Tran, 2007, Gelatinization and thermal properties of modified cassava starches, Starch, 59, 46, 10.1002/star.200600514 · DOI
- Veelaert, 1997, Chemical and physical transitions of periodate oxidized potato starch in water, Carbohydrate Polymers, 33, 153, 10.1016/S0144-8617(97)00046-5 · DOI
- Wang, 2003, Physicochemical properties of common and waxy corn starches oxidized by different levels of sodium hypochlorite, Carbohydrate Polymers, 52, 207, 10.1016/S0144-8617(02)003041 · DOI
- Wepner, 1999, Citrate starch – Application as resistant starch in different food system, Starch, 51, S354, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-379X(199910)51:10<354::AID-STAR354>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
- Woo, 2002, Cross-linked resistant starch: Preparation and properties, Cereal Chemistry, 79, 819, 10.1094/CCHEM.2002.79.6.819 · DOI
- Wootton, 1981, In vitro digestion of hydroxypropyl derivatives of wheat starch, Starch, 33, 135, 10.1002/star.19810330408 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Starch digestibility in food matrix: a review
Singh, J., Dartois, A., & Kaur, L. (2010) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2009.12.001 · Cited by 979
Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health
Lovegrove, A., Edwards, C. H., De Noni, I., Patel, H., El, S. N., Grassby, T., Zielke, C., Ulmius, M., Nilsson, L., Butterworth, P. J., et al. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2014.939263 · Cited by 606
“Some modifications of starches can alter the susceptibility to enzymic hydrolysis and/or their gelatinization behavior (Han and BeMiller, 2007; Chung et al., 2008; Hwang et al., 2009).”
BackgroundStarch Structure Influences Its Digestibility: A Review
Magallanes-Cruz, P. A., Flores‐Silva, P. C., & Bello‐Pérez, L. A. (2017) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/1750-3841.13809 · Cited by 313
Methodologies for Increasing the Resistant Starch Content of Food Starches: A Review
Dupuis, J. H., Liu, Q., & Yada, R. Y. (2014) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12104 · Cited by 276
Effect of cross-linking on the physicochemical and physiological properties of corn starch
Koo, S. H., Lee, K., & Lee, H. (2010) · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.02.009 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, H.-J., Shin, D.-H., & Lim, S.-T.
- Affiliations
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
- Korea University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lim, Seung-Taik
- ORCID
- Chung, Hyun-Jung
- Venue
- Food Research International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 579-585
- ISSN
- 0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077908293
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Research International (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
- Keywords
- corn starch, modified starch, starch digestibility, glycemic index, resistant starch, slowly digestible starch, rapidly digestible starch, hydroxypropylation, acetylation, starch oxidation, crosslinking, gelatinization, in vitro digestion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review