Cited by 260Food composition and propertiesPhytase and its ApplicationsProteins in Food Systems

In Vitro and in Vivo Hydrolysis of Legume Starches by α-Amylase and Resistant Starch Formation in Legumes—A Review

Hoover, R, Zhou, Y·2003·Carbohydrate Polymers

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0144-8617(03)00180-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoover, R., & Zhou, Y.
Affiliations
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Corresponding author
Hoover, R
ORCID
Zhou, Y
Venue
Carbohydrate Polymers
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
401-417
ISSN
0144-8617 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037770073
Cited by
260
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Carbohydrate Polymers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytase and its Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
legume starch, resistant starch, alpha-amylase, starch hydrolysis, starch digestibility, in vitro starch digestion, retrogradation, gelatinization, starch modification, food processing effects, Fabaceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review