The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental impact of novel thermal and non-thermal technologies in food processing
Open accessAbstract
Abstract During the last 25 years, consumer demands for more convenient and varied food products have grown exponentially, together with the need for faster production rates, improved quality and extension in shelf life. These requests together with the severity of the traditional food processing technologies were driving forces for improvements in existing technologies and for the development of new food preservation technologies. Therefore, many technological developments have been directed towards unit operations such as pasteurization, sterilization, cooking and drying, and currently the new technological approaches for food preservation are serious candidates to replace the traditional well-established preservation processes. The aim of this review is to discuss the environmental impact that some of the most promising novel food preservation technologies may represent in terms of energy efficiency, water savings and reduced emissions. The emergence of novel thermal and non-thermal technologies allows producing high quality products with improvements in terms of heating efficiency and, consequently, in energy savings. Most of these technologies are locally clean processes and therefore appear to be more environment-friendly, having less environmental impact than the traditional ones. Novel processing technologies are increasingly attracting the attention of food processors once they can provide food products with improved quality and a reduced environmental footprint, while reducing processing costs and improving the added-value of the products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microwave food processing—A review
Chandrasekaran, S., Ramanathan, S., & Basak, T. (2013) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.033 · Cited by 987
Non‐thermal technologies and its current and future application in the food industry: a review
Zhang, Z., Wang, L., Zeng, X., Han, Z., & Brennan, C. S. (2019) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/ijfs.13903 · Cited by 432
Landmarks in the historical development of twenty first century food processing technologies
Misra, N. N., Koubaa, M., Roohinejad, S., Juliano, P., Alpas, H., Inácio, R. S., Saraiva, J. A., & Barba, F. J. (2017) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.001 · Cited by 312
Giacometti, J., Bursać Kovačević, D., Putnik, P., Gabrić, D., Bilušić, T., Krešić, G., Stulić, V., Barba, F. J., Chemat, F., Barbosa-Cánovas, G., et al. (2018) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2018.06.036 · Cited by 308
Current Evidence on the Bioavailability of Food Bioactive Peptides
Amigo, L., & Hernández-Ledesma, B. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25194479 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira, R. N., & Vicente, A. A.
- Venue
- Food Research International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1936-1943
- ISSN
- 0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134823017
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental impact of novel thermal and non-thermal technologies in food processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.013
- The paper
- Pereira, R. N., & Vicente, A. A. (2010). Environmental impact of novel thermal and non-thermal technologies in food processing. Food Research International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.