On printability, quality and nutritional properties of 3D printed cereal based snacks enriched with edible insects
Abstract
3D printing technology was employed to obtain snacks with a designed cylindrical geometry from wheat flour dough enriched by ground larvae of Yellow mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) as novel source of proteins. The main microstructural features, overall quality, and nutritional attributes were studied as a function of formulation, time and temperature of baking. The addition of ground insects up to 20 g/100 g (d.b.) resulted in softer dough. This caused an overflow in dough deposition producing the increase in diameter, height and weight of snacks. Baking conditions did not alter the overall aspect of the snacks, but modification of the main dimensional and microstructure attributes were observed due to the better water evaporation. The optimization of baking conditions found that 22 min and 200 °C allowed obtaining a maximum desirability of 0.693. Baked in these conditions, the printed snacks enriched with 10 and 20% of ground insects significantly increased the total essential amino acid, from 32.5 (0% insects) to 38.2 and 41.3 g/100 g protein, respectively. The protein digestibility corrected amino acid score increased from 41.6 to 65.2 from 0 to 20% insect enrichment, with lysine and methionine + cysteine being the respective limiting amino acid. Our results evidenced the rational promotion of insects based on nutritional arguments and validated the use of 3D printing as technology to manufacture innovative printed snacks without adverse impact on technological quality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The critical variables for all types of food to be printed lie on its rheological and physical properties.
“The critical variables for all types of food to be printed lies on its rheological and physical properties [12,[26], [27], [28]].”
From Towards the development of foods 3D printer: Trends and technologies for foods printing (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent advances and future perspective in additive manufacturing of foods based on 3D printing
Le-Bail, A., Maniglia, B. C., & Le-Bail, P. (2020) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2020.01.009 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Impact of macronutrients printability and 3D-printer parameters on 3D-food printing: a review
Pérez, B., Nykvist, H., Brøgger, A. F., Larsen, M. B., & Falkeborg, M. F. (2019) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.02.090 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Properties of 3D printed dough and optimization of printing parameters
Liu, Y., Liang, X., Saeed, A., Lan, W., & Qin, W. (2019) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2019.03.008 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
3D printing to innovate biopolymer materials for demanding applications: A review
Li, N., Qiao, D., Zhao, S., Lin, Q., Zhang, B., & Xie, F. (2021) · Materials Today Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100459 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
A 3D Food Printing Process for the New Normal Era: A Review
Lee, J. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9091495 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
The sustainability of emerging technologies for use in pharmaceutical manufacturing
Weaver, E., O’Hagan, C., & Lamprou, D. A. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2022.2093857 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Abedini, A., Sohrabvandi, S., Sadighara, P., Hosseini, H., Farhoodi, M., Assadpour, E., Alizadeh Sani, M., Zhang, F., Seyyedi-Mansour, S., & Jafari, S. M. (2024) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2024.103181 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Towards the development of foods 3D printer: Trends and technologies for foods printing
Neamah, H. A., & Tandio, J. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33882 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Using edible materials and ensuring regulatory compliance are essential in ensuring the safety of 3D-printed foods [76,174]. processing and pasteurization of insect proteins ensure their safety as food inks ([26,76,106,175].”
BackgroundGuaqueta-Garcia, D. J., Wolodko, J., & Wismer, W. (2025) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-03-2024-0255 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Severini, C., Azzollini, D., Albenzio, M., & Derossi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Foggia (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Severini, C.
- Venue
- Food Research International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 106
- Pages
- 666-676
- ISSN
- 0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792655923
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 22.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Food Research International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi del Molise (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
- Keywords
- 3D food printing, edible insects, Tenebrio molitor, yellow mealworm larvae, cereal-based snacks, wheat dough, baking conditions, dough microstructure, protein quality, amino acid composition, protein digestibility, insect protein
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acids, Animals, Edible Grain, Cooking, Dietary Proteins, Digestion, Flour, Food Handling, Food, Fortified, Hot Temperature, Nutritive Value, Protein Conformation, Quality Control, Tenebrio, Triticum, Insect Proteins, Snacks, Printing, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review