Cited by 156Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsFood composition and properties

Properties of 3D printed dough and optimization of printing parameters

Liu, Yaowen, Liang, Xue, Saeed, Ahmed, Lan, Weijie, Qin, Wen·2019·Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

Abstract

Customization of food using the three-dimensional (3D) printing technique is an extremely convenient and healthy way to cook food with maximum utilization of materials, and consequently, this technique has received considerable attention from the public in recent years. In this study, we explored the effect of material composition on the quality of 3D-printed food using wheat flour, freeze-dried mango powder, olive oil and water. Results showed that without adding the freeze-dried mango powder and olive oil, the best printing quality was obtained with a flour-to-water ratio of 5:3. When 2% of the total mass of olive oil was added, the best printing quality was obtained for a flour:water:olive oil ratio of 55:2.75:30. The optimum compressive pressure, needle velocity, needle diameter and internal filling ratio yielding the best printing quality were 600 kPa, 6 mm/s, 0.58 mm and 50%, respectively. The food samples produced using these optimum parameters exhibited multiple merits including well-organized packing structure, clear internal texture profile and a smaller total deformation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ifset.2019.03.008

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A food 3D printer with infrared heating allows the printed part to be cooked directly, integrating printing and cooking processes.

    “The practical implications are significant, as demonstrated by the food 3D printer with infrared heating, which allows the printed part to be cooked directly, showcasing the integration of printing and cooking processes [22,24].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Liang, X., Saeed, A., Lan, W., & Qin, W.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Sichuan Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Yaowen
  • Qin, Wen
Venue
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
54
Pages
9-18
ISSN
1466-8564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2924998771
Cited by
156
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51703147)
  • Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2018RZ0060)
  • Education Department of Sichuan Province (16ZB0044, 035Z1373)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
3D-printed food, dough formulation, wheat flour, olive oil, printing parameter optimization, compressive pressure, needle diameter, print quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review