Cited by 2Proteins in Food SystemsProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesProtein purification and stability

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative impacts of physical and chemical modifications on pea protein concentrate: Effects on physicochemical properties

Open access

Abstract

Pea proteins are promising plant-based ingredients; however, their limited solubility restricts broader application. While pea protein isolates are widely studied, the modification of pea protein concentrate remains underexplored. This study compared four modification methods, two physical modifications (dry heating and ultrasonication), and two chemical modifications (pH shifting and Maillard conjugation with guar gum) to improve the solubility of pea protein concentrate. Optimal conditions were: dry heating (80 °C, 30 min), ultrasonication (70% amplitude, 5 min), pH shifting (pH 10, 3 h), and Maillard reaction (60 °C, 1 h). All treatments altered solubility, surface charge, hydrophobicity, particle size, and protein structure. Ultrasonication and pH shifting achieved the highest solubility improvements (96.4% and 92.62%, respectively, from an initial 73.1%). Maillard conjugation increased hydrophobicity but had a limited impact on solubility, with only a 6% increase, while dry heating showed the least change. Overall, all modifications increased the surface hydrophobicity of the proteins, while the proportions of α-helix and β-turn structures increased in all treatments except the conjugated protein. These findings indicate that each method affects pea protein concentrate differently, highlighting the importance of selecting techniques based on the intended application.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodres.2026.119198

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ultrasonication enhances both electrostatic and hydrophilic interactions in proteins, thereby enhancing protein hydrophilicity and solubility.

    “These findings suggest that ultrasonication enhances both electrostatic and hydrophilic interactions in proteins (Sharifi et al., 2026), thereby enhancing protein hydrophi­ licity and solubility (Zhu et al., 2025).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Boukid, 2021, Pea protein ingredients: A mainstream ingredient to (re)formulate innovative foods and beverages, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 110, 729, 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.040 · DOI
  2. Bucciarelli, 2021, Tidy dataset of the experimental design of the optimization of the alkali degumming process of bombyx mori silk, Data in Brief, 38, 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107294 · DOI
  3. Burger, 2019, Recent progress in the utilization of pea protein as an emulsifier for food applications, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 86, 25, 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.007 · DOI
  4. Carpentier, 2021, Complex coacervation of pea protein isolate and tragacanth gum: Comparative study with commercial polysaccharides, Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 69, 10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102641 · DOI
  5. Chang, 2022, Plant proteins from green pea and chickpea: Extraction, fractionation, structural characterization and functional properties, Food Hydrocolloids, 123, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107165 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cui, 2020, Functionality and structure of yellow pea protein isolate as affected by cultivars and extraction pH, Food Hydrocolloids, 108, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106008 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Du, 2013, Physicochemical properties and emulsion stabilization of rice dreg glutelin conjugated with κ-carrageenan through maillard reaction, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93, 125, 10.1002/jsfa.5739 · DOI
  8. Fang, 2020, Enhancing the usability of pea protein isolate in food applications through modifying its structural and sensory properties via deamidation by glutaminase, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 68, 1691, 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06046 · DOI
  9. Fernando, S. (2022). Pulse protein ingredient modification. In Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (vol. 102, 3, pp. 892–897). John Wiley and sons ltd. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11548. · DOI
  10. Gundogan, 2020, Physicochemical and functional properties of proteins isolated from local beans of Turkey, LWT, 130, 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109609 · DOI
  11. Han, 2024, Characteristic of the interaction mechanism between soy protein isolate and functional polysaccharide with different charge characteristics and exploration of the foaming properties, Food Hydrocolloids, 150, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109615 · DOI
  12. He, 2022, Effect of hydrothermal treatment on the structure and functional properties of quinoa protein isolate, Foods, 11, 10.3390/foods11192954 · DOI
  13. Higa, 2024, Effect of pH shifting and temperature on the functional properties of a commercial pea protein isolate, Cereal Chemistry
  14. Huang, 2022, Intervention of microwave irradiation on structure and quality characteristics of quinoa protein aggregates, Food Hydrocolloids, 131, 107677, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107677 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jiang, 2017, Modifying the physicochemical properties of pea protein by pH-shifting and ultrasound combined treatments, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 38, 835, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.03.046 · DOI
  16. Jiang, 2022, Pea protein isolate-inulin conjugates prepared by pH-shift treatment and ultrasonic-enhanced glycosylation: Structural and functional properties, Food Chemistry, 384, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132511 · DOI
  17. Ke, C., & Li, L. (2023). Influence mechanism of polysaccharides induced Maillard reaction on plant proteins structure and functional properties: A review. In Carbohydrate Polymers (Vol. Vol. 302). Elsevier Ltd. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120430. · DOI
  18. Kumar, M., Tomar, M., Potkule, J., Verma, R., Punia, S., Mahapatra, A., Belwal, T., Dahuja, A., Joshi, S., Berwal, M. K., Satankar, V., Bhoite, A. G., Amarowicz, R., Kaur, C., & Kennedy, J. F. (2021). Advances in the plant protein extraction: Mechanism and recommendations. In Food Hydrocolloids (Vol. Vol. 115). Elsevier B.V. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106595. · DOI
  19. Lao, 2023, Quantifying the effects of pre-roasting on structural and functional properties of yellow pea proteins, Food Research International, 172, 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113180 · DOI
  20. Le, 2013, Direct evidence for the role of maillard reaction products in protein cross-linking in milk powder during storage, International Dairy Journal, 31, 83, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2013.02.013 · DOI
  21. Ma, 2019, Ultrasound treatment improved the physicochemical characteristics of cod protein and enhanced the stability of oil-in-water emulsion, Food Research International, 121, 247, 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.024 · DOI
  22. Martínez-Velasco, 2018, High intensity ultrasound treatment of faba bean (vicia faba l.) protein: Effect on surface properties, foaming ability and structural changes, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 44, 97, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.02.007 · DOI
  23. Maseko, 2014, Selenium-enriched agaricus bisporus increases expression and activity of glutathione peroxidase-1 and expression of glutathione peroxidase-2 in rat colon, Food Chemistry, 146, 327, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.074 · DOI
  24. de Oliveira, 2020, Combined adjustment of pH and ultrasound treatments modify techno-functionalities of pea protein concentrates, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 603, 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125156 · DOI
  25. Peng, 2016, Effects of heat treatment on the emulsifying properties of pea proteins, Food Hydrocolloids, 52, 301, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.06.025 · DOI
  26. Pirestani, 2017, Preparation of chemically modified canola protein isolate with gum arabic by means of maillard reaction under wet-heating conditions, Carbohydrate Polymers, 155, 201, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.054 · DOI
  27. Sha, 2021, Interfacial dilatational and emulsifying properties of ultrasound-treated pea protein, Food Chemistry, 350, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129271 · DOI
  28. Sha, 2022, Comparative structural and emulsifying properties of ultrasound-treated pea (pisum sativum l.) protein isolate and the legumin and vicilin fractions, Food Research International, 156, 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111179 · DOI
  29. Sharifi, 2024, Pulse proteins, their extraction and application in bakery products: A review, Food Reviews International Taylor and Francis Ltd
  30. Shen, 2022, Effects of pH-shifting treatments on oil-water interfacial properties of pea protein isolates: Identification and quantification of proteins at interfacial protein layer, Food Hydrocolloids, 133, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107937 · DOI
  31. Shen, 2022, Improving functional properties of pea protein through “green” modifications using enzymes and polysaccharides, Food Chemistry, 385, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132687 · DOI
  32. Shen, 2021, Acylation modification and/or guar gum conjugation enhanced functional properties of pea protein isolate, Food Hydrocolloids, 117, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106686 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Shevkani, 2015, Structural and functional characterization of kidney bean and field pea protein isolates: A comparative study, Food Hydrocolloids, 43, 679, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.07.024 · DOI
  34. Shrestha, 2023, Comparative study on molecular and higher-order structures of legume seed protein isolates: Lentil, mungbean and yellow pea, Food Chemistry, 411, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135464 · DOI
  35. Silventoinen, 2020, Impact of ultrasound treatment and ph-shifting on physicochemical properties of protein-enriched barley fraction and barley protein isolate, Foods, 9, 10.3390/foods9081055 · DOI
  36. Tang, 2023, Effect of a pH shift treatment on the functional properties of individual and blended commercial plant protein ingredients, European Food Research and Technology, 249, 1969, 10.1007/s00217-023-04267-0 · DOI
  37. Wen, 2023, Effects of different dry heating temperatures on the spatial structure and amino acid residue side-chain oxidative modification of soybean isolated proteins, Food Chemistry, 405, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134795 · DOI
  38. Xia, 2024, Enhancing the usability of pea protein in emulsion applications through modification by various approaches: A comparative study, Food Research International, 188, 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114477 · DOI
  39. Yan, 2024, Enhanced functional properties of pea protein isolate microgel particles modified with sodium alginate: Mixtures and conjugates, Food Chemistry, 441, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138358 · DOI
  40. Yang, 2021, Extraction methods significantly impact pea protein composition, structure and gelling properties, Food Hydrocolloids, 117, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106678 · DOI
  41. Yang, 2022, Structural modification induced by heat treatments improves the emulsifying attributes of lacquer seed protein isolate, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 222, 1700, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.223 · DOI
  42. Yang, 2025, Disturbing egg yolk protein structure via pH-shifting treatment for interface reorganization: Improving solubility to enhance oil-water interface adsorption and emulsification properties, Food Chemistry, 468, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.142516 · DOI
  43. Zha, 2019, The structural modification of pea protein concentrate with gum arabic by controlled maillard reaction enhances its functional properties and flavor attributes, Food Hydrocolloids, 92, 30, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.01.046 · DOI
  44. Zhang, 2022, Synergistic modification of pea protein structure using high-intensity ultrasound and pH-shifting technology to improve solubility and emulsification, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 88, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106099 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Zhang, 2025, Effects of combined hot alkaline and pH-shift treatments on structure and functionality of legume protein-EGCG conjugates: Soybean-, pea-, and chickpea protein-EGCG systems, Food Hydrocolloids, 158, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110424 · DOI
  46. Zhao, 2024, Structure and functionality of whey protein, pea protein, and mixed whey and pea proteins treated by pH shift or high-intensity ultrasound, Journal of Dairy Science, 107, 726, 10.3168/jds.2023-23742 · DOI
  47. Zhi, 2022, A combined approach for modifying pea protein isolate to greatly improve its solubility and emulsifying stability, Food Chemistry, 380, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131832 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sharifi, A., Ahmadi, F., Ng, K., Maharjan, P., Walker, C., & Suleria, H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Agriculture Victoria (AU)
Corresponding author
Suleria, Hafiz
Venue
Food Research International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-07
Volume
235
Pages
119198
ISSN
0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7154527452
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Agriculture Victoria
  • Australian Government Grains Research and Development Corporation (DEE2312-002RTX)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
pea protein concentrate, protein solubility, physical modification, chemical modification, sonication, dry heating, pH change, Maillard reaction, guar gum, surface hydrophobicity, surface charge, protein secondary structure, plant proteins
MeSH terms
Pea Proteins, Food Handling, Hot Temperature, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Particle Size, Solubility, Maillard Reaction, Pisum sativum, Chemical Phenomena, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review