Cited by 3Proteins in Food SystemsProtein Structure and DynamicsProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improving fava bean protein functionality via mild ultrasonication: A comparative study with other plant proteins

Open access
Mukhtar, Kinza, Wang, Yong, Selomulya, Cordelia·2026·Food Research International

Abstract

Fava bean protein isolate (FBPI) is a promising alternative protein source in food formulation due to its high nutritional value and environmental sustainability. However, its limited solubility and functional properties restrict its use in food applications. This study investigated the effect of mild ultrasonication (72-102 W; 1-15 min) on the structural and functional properties of FBPI and compared it with those of pea, soy, and rice protein isolates. Mild ultrasonication increased FBPI solubility from 40% (untreated) to 92%, particularly after 3-5 min of treatment, which was attributed to the disruption of protein aggregates. In comparison, solubility also increased for pea from 10 to 12% (untreated) to 60-86% for different commercial isolates, soy from control 19% to 36% and rice control 5% to 6% at ultrasonication US 72 W with 5 min treatment. Structural analysis (FTIR and MMS) revealed a high β-sheet content in native FBPI and an increase in β-sheet proportion following mild ultrasonication in all protein isolates, suggesting conformational rearrangements and partial protein unfolding. These molecular changes were accompanied by a marked increase in surface hydrophobicity (H o ), likely due to the exposure of buried hydrophobic residues. The enhanced interfacial properties resulted in a twofold improvement in emulsion stability index, although the emulsifying activity index (EAI) remained relatively unchanged (p > 0.05). Overall, mild ultrasonication induced structural…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodres.2026.119231

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ultrasonication effects can reduce particle size, promote partial unfolding, and modify non-covalent interactions, thereby altering solubility, aggregation behaviour, and gelation performance.

    “These effects can reduce particle size, promote partial unfolding, and modify non-covalent interactions, thereby altering solubility, aggregation behaviour, and gelation performance”
  • Existing studies have primarily focused on the effects of ultrasound parameters on native or untreated protein isolates, with emphasis on extraction efficiency, solubility and interfacial properties, particularly for legume proteins such as faba bean and mung bean proteins.

    “existing studies have primarily focused on the effects of ultrasound parameters on native or untreated protein isolates, with emphasis on extraction efficiency, solubility and interfacial properties, particularly for legume proteins such as faba bean and mung bean proteins”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Adal, 2024, Modification of faba bean protein isolate by high-intensity ultrasound treatment: Screening of physicochemical, thermal, and structural properties, Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 18, 2438, 10.1007/s11694-024-02379-z · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aghababaei, 2024, Ultrasound processing for enhanced digestibility of plant proteins, Food Hydrocolloids, 155, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110188 · DOI
  3. Alavi, 2021, Effect of ultrasound-assisted alkaline treatment on functional property modifications of faba bean protein, Food Chemistry, 354, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129494 · DOI
  4. Byanju, 2020, Effect of high-power sonication pretreatment on extraction and some physicochemical properties of proteins from chickpea, kidney bean, and soybean, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 145, 712, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.118 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cao, 2015, Chlorogenic acid-mediated gel formation of oxidatively stressed myofibrillar protein, Food Chemistry, 180, 235, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.036 · DOI
  6. Chandrapala, 2011, Effects of ultrasound on the thermal and structural characteristics of proteins in reconstituted whey protein concentrate, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 18, 951, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.12.016 · DOI
  7. Constantino, 2020, Modifications of physicochemical and functional properties of amaranth protein isolate (amaranthus cruentus BRS alegria) treated with high-intensity ultrasound, Journal of Cereal Science, 95
  8. Cui, 2021, Ultrasonication effects on physicochemical and emulsifying properties of cyperus esculentus seed (tiger nut) proteins, LWT, 142, 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110979 · DOI
  9. De Meutter, 2021, Evaluation of protein secondary structure from FTIR spectra improved after partial deuteration, European Biophysics Journal, 50, 613, 10.1007/s00249-021-01502-y · DOI
  10. Dhull, 2022, A review of nutritional profile and processing of faba bean (vicia faba l.), Legume Science, 4, 10.1002/leg3.129 · DOI
  11. Ding, 2021, Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the structure and functional properties of mantle proteins from scallops (patinopecten yessoensis), Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 79, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105770 · DOI
  12. Eckert, 2019, Effects of enzymatic hydrolysis and ultrafiltration on physicochemical and functional properties of faba bean protein, Cereal Chemistry, 96, 725, 10.1002/cche.10169 · DOI
  13. Frydenberg, 2016, Protein denaturation of whey protein isolates (WPIs) induced by high intensity ultrasound during heat gelation, Food Chemistry, 192, 415, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.037 · DOI
  14. Gao, 2022, Unraveling the mechanism by which high intensity ultrasound improves the solubility of commercial pea protein isolates, Food Hydrocolloids, 131, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107823 · DOI
  15. Gharibzahedi, 2020, The functional modification of legume proteins by ultrasonication: A review, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 98, 107, 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.002 · DOI
  16. Godfray, 2018, Meat consumption, health, and the environment, Science (New York, N.Y.), 361, 10.1126/science.aam5324 · DOI
  17. Gulzar, 2024, Tailoring the techno-functional properties of fava bean protein isolates: A comparative evaluation of ultrasonication and pulsed electric field treatments, Foods, 13, 376, 10.3390/foods13030376 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hanley, 2025, Physicochemical and functional characterization of plant protein isolates and their influence on plant-based mozzarella cheese performance, Food Hydrocolloids, 164, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2025.111222 · DOI
  19. He, 2021, Effect of microbial transglutaminase on the structural and rheological characteristics and in vitro digestion of rice glutelin–casein blends, Food Research International, 139, 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109832 · DOI
  20. Higuita, 2023, Climate change, industrial animal agriculture, and the role of physicians – Time to act, The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 13
  21. Hu, 2013, Effects of ultrasound on structural and physical properties of soy protein isolate (SPI) dispersions, Food Hydrocolloids, 30, 647, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.08.001 · DOI
  22. Huang, 2015, Inactivation, aggregation, secondary and tertiary structural changes of germin-like protein in Satsuma mandarine with high polyphenol oxidase activity induced by ultrasonic processing, Biophysical Chemistry, 197, 18, 10.1016/j.bpc.2014.12.001 · DOI
  23. Igartúa, 2024, Combination of PH-shifting, ultrasound, and heat treatments to enhance solubility and emulsifying stability of rice protein isolate, Food Chemistry, 433, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137319 · DOI
  24. Ivancic, 2022, Advancing secondary structure characterization of monoclonal antibodies using microfluidic modulation spectroscopy, Analytical Biochemistry, 646, 10.1016/j.ab.2022.114629 · DOI
  25. Jiang, 2011, Role of β-conglycinin and glycinin subunits in the PH-shifting-induced structural and physicochemical changes of soy protein isolate, Journal of Food Science, 76, C293, 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.02035.x · DOI
  26. Jiang, 2014, Effects of ultrasound on the structure and physical properties of black bean protein isolates, Food Research International, 62, 595, 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.04.022 · DOI
  27. Kato, 1980, Hydrophobicity determined by a fluorescence probe method and its correlation with surface properties of proteins, Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta - Protein Structure, 624, 13, 10.1016/0005-2795(80)90220-2 · DOI
  28. Kim, 2023, Secondary structure characterization of mixed food protein complexes using microfluidic modulation spectroscopy (MMS), Food Bioscience, 53, 10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102513 · DOI
  29. Kinsella, 1976, Functional properties of proteins in foods: A survey, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 7, 219, 10.1080/10408397609527208 · DOI
  30. Langton, 2020, Gelation of faba bean proteins - effect of extraction method, PH and NaCl, Food Hydrocolloids, 103, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105622 · DOI
  31. Li, 2022, Physicochemical properties of different pea proteins in relation to their gelation ability to form lactic acid bacteria induced yogurt gel, LWT, 161, 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113381 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Li, 2016, Effects of ultrasound and ultrasound assisted alkaline pretreatments on the enzymolysis and structural characteristics of rice protein, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 31, 20, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.11.019 · DOI
  33. Lo, 2019, Effect of low-frequency ultrasound on the particle size, solubility and surface charge of reconstituted sodium caseinate, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 58, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.03.016 · DOI
  34. Lo, 2022, Effect of low frequency ultrasound on the functional characteristics of isolated lupin protein, Food Hydrocolloids, 124, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107345 · DOI
  35. Luo, 2022, Impacts of sonication and high hydrostatic pressure on the structural and physicochemical properties of quinoa protein isolate dispersions at acidic, neutral and alkaline PHs, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 91, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106232 · DOI
  36. Ma, 2023, Yeast protein as a novel dietary protein source: Comparison with four common plant proteins in physicochemical properties, Current Research in Food Science, 7, 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100555 · DOI
  37. Melchior, 2022, High pressure homogenization shapes the techno-functionalities and digestibility of pea proteins, Food and Bioproducts Processing, 131, 77, 10.1016/j.fbp.2021.10.011 · DOI
  38. Mir, 2019, Structural modification of quinoa seed protein isolates (QPIs) by variable time sonification for improving its physicochemical and functional characteristics, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 58, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104700 · DOI
  39. Naik, 2024, Assessing the effect of maillard reaction products on the functionality and antioxidant properties of Amaranth-red seaweed blends, Food Research International, 175, 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113759 · DOI
  40. Omura, 2021, Effects of protein concentration during ultrasonic processing on physicochemical properties and techno-functionality of plant food proteins, Food Hydrocolloids, 113, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106457 · DOI
  41. O’Sullivan, 2016, The effect of ultrasound treatment on the structural, physical and emulsifying properties of animal and vegetable proteins, Food Hydrocolloids, 53, 141, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.02.009 · DOI
  42. Poore, 2018, Reducing foods environmental impacts through producers and consumers, Science, 360, 987, 10.1126/science.aaq0216 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Rafique, 2024, Ultrasound-assisted modification of oat protein isolates: Structural and functional enhancements, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 112
  44. Ren, 2020, Comparison of hydrodynamic and ultrasonic cavitation effects on soy protein isolate functionality, Journal of Food Engineering, 265, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109697 · DOI
  45. Resendiz-Vazquez, 2017, Effect of high-intensity ultrasound on the technofunctional properties and structure of jackfruit (artocarpus heterophyllus) seed protein isolate, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 37, 436, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.01.042 · DOI
  46. Tan, 2015, Characterisation of improved foam aeration and rheological properties of ultrasonically treated whey protein suspension, International Dairy Journal, 43, 7, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.09.013 · DOI
  47. Tang, 2017, Emulsifying properties of soy proteins: A critical review with emphasis on the role of conformational flexibility, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57, 2636, 10.1080/10408398.2015.1067594 · DOI
  48. Tang, 2009, Formation of soluble aggregates from insoluble commercial soy protein isolate by means of ultrasonic treatment and their gelling properties, Journal of Food Engineering, 92, 432, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.12.017 · DOI
  49. Tang, 2024, Comparative studies on enhancing pea protein extraction recovery rates and structural integrity using ultrasonic and hydrodynamic cavitation technologies, LWT, 200, 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116130 · DOI
  50. Tao, 2019, Effects of pretreatments on the structure and functional properties of okara protein, Food Hydrocolloids, 90, 394, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.12.028 · DOI
  51. Thomsen, 2025, Faba bean protein: Chemical composition, functionality, volatile compounds, and applications in food production, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 156, 10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104863 · DOI
  52. Wagner, 2000, Relation between solubility and surface hydrophobicity as an indicator of modifications during preparation processes of commercial and laboratory-prepared soy protein isolates, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48, 3159, 10.1021/jf990823b · DOI
  53. Wang, 2021, Effect of high intensity ultrasound on the structure and solubility of soy protein isolate-pectin complex, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 80, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105808 · DOI
  54. Wang, 2024, Effects of mono- and dual-frequency ultrasounds on structure and physicochemical properties of faba bean proteins, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 111, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.107144 · DOI
  55. Wang, 2022, Effects of ultrasound on the structural and emulsifying properties and interfacial properties of oxidized soybean protein aggregates, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 87, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106046 · DOI
  56. Wang, 2023, Ultrasound improves the physicochemical and foam properties of whey protein microgel, Frontiers in Nutrition, 10
  57. Xu, 2020, Effect of multi-frequency power ultrasound (MFPU) treatment on enzyme hydrolysis of casein, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 63, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104930 · DOI
  58. Xu, 2021, Application of ultrasound in stabilizing of Antarctic krill oil by modified chickpea protein isolate and ginseng saponin, LWT, 149, 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111803 · DOI
  59. Yan, 2021, Effects of flexibility and surface hydrophobicity on emulsifying properties: Ultrasound-treated soybean protein isolate, LWT, 142, 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110881 · DOI
  60. Yang, 2022, The impact of heating and freeze or spray drying on the interface and foam stabilising properties of pea protein extracts: Explained by aggregation and protein composition, Food Hydrocolloids, 133, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107913 · DOI
  61. Yang, 2018, Effects of high pressure homogenization on faba bean protein aggregation in relation to solubility and interfacial properties, Food Hydrocolloids, 83, 275, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.05.020 · DOI
  62. Yang, 2021, Extraction methods significantly impact pea protein composition, structure and gelling properties, Food Hydrocolloids, 117, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106678 · DOI
  63. Yang, 2021, Effects of vacuum ultrasonic treatment on the texture of vegetarian meatloaves made from textured wheat protein, Food Chemistry, 361, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130058 · DOI
  64. Yousefi, 2022, Food proteins: Solubility & thermal stability improvement techniques, Food Chemistry Advances, 1, 10.1016/j.focha.2022.100090 · DOI
  65. Yu, 2024, Impact of Reconstitution Conditions on the Solubility of Faba Bean Protein Isolate, Foods, 13, 3857, 10.3390/foods13233857 · DOI
  66. Zhang, 2020, Effects of multi-frequency ultrasound on physicochemical properties, structural characteristics of gluten protein and the quality of noodle, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 67, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105135 · DOI
  67. Zhao, 2021, Effects of high-intensity ultrasound pretreatment on structure, properties, and enzymolysis of walnut protein isolate, Molecules, 27, 10.3390/molecules27010208 · DOI
  68. Zhu, 2018, Effects of sonication on the physicochemical and functional properties of walnut protein isolate, Food Research International, 106, 853, 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.060 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mukhtar, K., Wang, Y., & Selomulya, C.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yong
Venue
Food Research International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-07
Volume
236
Pages
119231
ISSN
0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7154716692
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP250101468)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Keywords
protein solubility, protein functional properties, protein structure modification, β-sheet content, protein unfolding, surface hydrophobicity, emulsifying properties, emulsion stability, pea protein isolate, soy protein isolate, rice protein isolate, plant proteins, alternative protein sources
MeSH terms
Food Handling, Plant Proteins, Oryza, Solubility, Sonication, Glycine max, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Pisum sativum, Soybean Proteins, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review