Cited by 96

Impact of high-pressure homogenization on physico-chemical, structural, and rheological properties of quinoa protein isolates

Luo, Lan, Cheng, Lirong, Zhang, Ruijia, Yang, Zhi·2022·Food Structure

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foostr.2022.100265

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall, submicron particles and microgels are usually the more robust route for Pickering, HIPEs and emulsion-gel structuring, while nanoparticles are preferable to fine emulsions with rapid adsorption.

    “Overall, submicron particles and microgels are usually the more robust route for Pickering, HIPEs and emulsion-gel structuring, while nanoparticles are preferable to fine emulsions with rapid adsorption (Zhang et al., 2026; Luo et al., 2022).”
  • Moderate unfolding and reduced aggregation are often associated with higher solubility and better interfacial adsorption.

    “Moderate unfolding and reduced aggregation are often associated with higher solubility and better interfacial adsorption”
  • High-pressure homogenization reduced the particle size of quinoa protein isolate, improved solubility, enhanced emulsifying and foaming properties, accelerated surface/interfacial tension reduction, and strengthened heat-induced gels, under a specific extraction route, protein concentration, pressure range, and pH condition.

    “high-pressure homogenization reduced the particle size of quinoa protein isolate, improved solubility, enhanced emulsifying and foaming properties, accelerated surface/interfacial tension reduction, and strengthened heat-induced gels, but these outcomes were generated under a specific extraction route, protein concentration, pressure range, and pH condition (Luo et al., 2022).”
  • Reported data differ substantially in extraction route, pH trajectory, protein purity, fraction composition, co-component retention, processing intensity, and analytical endpoints, which makes direct pooling of values unreliable.

    “Reported data differ substantially in extraction route, pH tra­ jectory, protein purity, fraction composition, co-component retention, processing intensity, and analytical endpoints, which makes direct pooling of values unreliable (Liu et al., 2023; Luo et al., 2022; Yan & Zhu, 2025).”
  • Water extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction, and homogenization show that extraction route affects yield, purity, co-component retention, particle state, and functionality.

    “Water extraction, ultrasound- assisted extraction, and homogenization show that extraction route affects yield, purity, co-component retention, particle state, and”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review