Bison limit ecosystem recovery in northern Yellowstone
Open accessAbstract
American bison (Bison bison) numbers in northern Yellowstone National Park increased during the last two decades, while those of elk (Cervus canadensis) decreased. We undertook this study to assess the potential effects of bison on woody vegetation and channel morphology in the park's northern ungulate winter range. Based on differences in the number of elk and bison, body mass, and the amount of time each utilizes the northern range, foraging pressure from bison began to exceed that of elk in 2007 and is currently ~10 times greater than that of elk. In the Lamar Valley study area, stand structure data (i.e., tree frequency by diameter class) for aspen (Populus tremuloides) and cottonwood (P. spp.) indicated that the growth of seedling/sprouts of these species into tall saplings and trees has been extensively suppressed by bison herbivory. For streams that crossed the valley floor, woody riparian vegetation was absent along their banks and channels were relatively wide and deep, conditions sustained by high levels of bison use. Overall, our findings indicated that the elevated numbers of bison, via herbivory, trampling, and tree bark effects, are limiting the structure, composition, and distribution of woody plant communities in the Lamar Valley, affecting the character of the valley's stream and river channels, and, in turn, influencing habitat and food-web support for terrestrial and aquatic wildlife species. The conservation success of bison recovery now may be adversely affecting another conservation goal, the restoration and maintenance of woody riparian vegetation and riparian ecosystems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bison numbers increased more than fourfold between 2004 and 2015.
“Bison numbers increased more than fourfold between 2004 and 2015, and their ecosystem effects have similarly increased,”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Beschta et al., 2020
Beschta et al. (2020) reported that 97% of mature lodgepole pine trees in their study area in Lamar Valley had been killed by bark removal.
“In the Lamar Valley of northern YNP, Beschta et al. (2020) reported that 97% of mature lodgepole pine trees in their study area had been killed by bark removal.”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. (2020)
Bison on the northern range increased from less than 1000 in the early 2000s to approximately 4000 animals in recent years despite annual culling.
“Bison on the northern range have increased from less than 1000 in the early 2000s to approximately 4000 animals in recent years (Figure 3) despite annual culling in winter as bison migrated outside the park boundary (Beschta et al., 2020; Geremia, 2022; Mosley & Mundinger, 2018; Plumb et al., 2009).”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Beschta et al., 2020
Consumptive effects of bison can be significant where bison are present in high densities year after year, as in northern Yellowstone.
“These consumptive effects can be significant where bison are present in high densities year after year, as in northern Yellowstone (Beschta et al., 2020; Painter & Ripple, 2012; Rose & Cooper, 2016).”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Beschta et al., 2020
Only recently, as elk have decreased and bison increased, have bison emerged as an important factor affecting the dynamics of these woody plants.
“Only recently, as elk have decreased and bison increased, have bison emerged as an important factor affecting the dynamics of these woody plants (Beschta et al., 2020; Painter & Ripple, 2012; Ripple et al., 2010; Rose & Cooper, 2016).”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Beschta et al., 2020
Fallen trees provided temporary protection for young aspen from bison and elk.
“These fallen trees provided temporary protection for young aspen from bison and elk (Beschta et al., 2020; Ripple & Larsen, 2001), as elk densities decreased.”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Beschta et al., 2020
Herbivory continued at high rates in some places, particularly where bison were in high concentrations and browsed on willow in the summer, as in Lamar Valley.
“Herbivory also continued at high rates in some places, particularly where bison were in high concentrations and browsed on willow in the summer, as in Lamar Valley (Painter andRipple 2012, Beschta et al. 2020).”
From Tall willow thickets return to northern Yellowstone (2020) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
The temporary increase in cottonwood saplings in 2012 likely resulted from reduced ungulate herbivory in the early 2000s, when elk numbers were low and before bison numbers increased dramatically.
“This increase likely resulted from reduced rates of ungulate herbivory in the early 2000s, when elk numbers in the eastern sector had become low and before bison numbers had dramatically increased (Beschta et al. 2020).”
From A Century of Overabundant Ungulates in Yellowstone’s Lamar Valley: First Elk and Now Bison (2026) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
Since about 2007, the overall foraging pressure of Northern Range bison has increasingly exceeded that of elk, representing a profound shift in ungulate use within a relatively short period.
“Since about 2007, the overall foraging pressure of Northern Range bison has increasingly exceeded that of elk (Beschta et al. 2020), representing a profound shift in ungulate use within a relatively short period.”
From A Century of Overabundant Ungulates in Yellowstone’s Lamar Valley: First Elk and Now Bison (2026) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
In areas of high bison use, a lack of cottonwood recruitment and that of other woody species will continue the simplification of these potentially biologically diverse communities.
“Functionally impoverished riparian plant communities: In areas of high bison use, a lack of cottonwood recruitment and that of other woody species will continue the simplification of these potentially biologically diverse communities (Beschta et al. 2020; Kauffman et al. 2023).”
From A Century of Overabundant Ungulates in Yellowstone’s Lamar Valley: First Elk and Now Bison (2026) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
Bison most commonly forage along valley bottoms and other low-elevation areas of northern Yellowstone.
“bison most commonly forage along valley bottoms and other low-elevation areas of northern Yellowstone (Geremia and Hamilton 2019; Beschta et al. 2020; Yellowstone National Park 2024b)”
From A Century of Overabundant Ungulates in Yellowstone’s Lamar Valley: First Elk and Now Bison (2026) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
River sinuosity for the Lower Lamar decreased by ~30% over 1954-2015.
“That conclusion was supported by a subsequent analysis of river sinuosity for the Lower Lamar, where it was found to have decreased by ~30% over the relatively short period of only six decades (i.e., 1954–2015) (Beschta et al. 2020).”
From A Century of Overabundant Ungulates in Yellowstone’s Lamar Valley: First Elk and Now Bison (2026) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
In areas of high bison use such as the Lamar Valley, intensive herbivory, trampling, and bark damage are suppressing recruitment and degrading many riparian plant communities.
“In areas of high bison use such as the Lamar Valley, intensive herbivory, trampling, and bark damage are suppressing recruitment and degrading many riparian plant communities (Beschta et al. 2020; Kauffman et al. 2023; Painter et al. 2023).”
From A Century of Overabundant Ungulates in Yellowstone’s Lamar Valley: First Elk and Now Bison (2026) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
Bison horning and rubbing appear to be a relatively new disturbance process within Yellowstone National Park, capable of affecting the composition and structural diversity of cottonwoods, willows, aspen, and conifers.
“The physical effects of bison horning and rubbing appear to represent a relatively “new” disturbance process within the Park, capable of affecting the composition and structural diversity of cottonwoods and willows in riparian areas, aspen in uplands and riparian areas, and conifers along rivers and grassland edges (White et al. 2015; Beschta et al. 2020; Painter et al. 2012, 2023).”
From A Century of Overabundant Ungulates in Yellowstone’s Lamar Valley: First Elk and Now Bison (2026) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
In 2018, 97% of 91 mature lodgepole pines in the Lower Lamar study reach were dead, with cambium absent from 60-80% of their circumferences due to bison horning and rubbing.
“in 2018 Beschta et al. (2020) evaluated a stand of 91 mature lodgepole pines (dbh range = 32–49 cm) growing immediately adjacent to the river in the Lower Lamar study reach. Ninety-seven percent of them were dead, with cambium absent from 60–80% of their circumferences due to bison horning and rubbing.”
From A Century of Overabundant Ungulates in Yellowstone’s Lamar Valley: First Elk and Now Bison (2026) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
The general absence of functional riparian plant communities along the Lamar River will allow for accelerated riverbank erosion, high rates of channel migration, greater sediment loads, and increasingly wide active channels.
“Decreased streambank stability and altered channel morphology: The general absence of functional riparian plant communities along the Lamar River will allow for accelerated riverbank erosion, high rates of channel migration, greater sediment loads, and increasingly wide active channels (Rosgen 1993; Beschta et al. 2020).”
From A Century of Overabundant Ungulates in Yellowstone’s Lamar Valley: First Elk and Now Bison (2026) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
Intensive herbivory and trampling by bison can have major effects on wetlands and tributary streams, as well as their associated communities.
“Modified wetlands and tributary streams: Intensive herbivory and trampling by bison can have major effects on wetlands (e.g., springs, seeps, and areas adjacent to ponds or lakes) and tributary streams, as well as their associated communities (Beschta et al. 2020; Kauffman et al. 2023).”
From A Century of Overabundant Ungulates in Yellowstone’s Lamar Valley: First Elk and Now Bison (2026) · cites this paper as Beschta et al. 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Beschta, R. L., Ripple, W. J., Kauffman, J. B., & Painter, L. E.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beschta, Robert L.
- Venue
- Food Webs
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- e00142
- ISSN
- 2352-2496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3006099799
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Food Webs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Ecosystem Restoration Research Fund
- National Science Foundation (1754221)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Keywords
- American bison, bison, elk, ungulate herbivory, woody vegetation, aspen, cottonwood, riparian vegetation, stream channel morphology, Yellowstone National Park, ecological restoration, trampling, bark damage, wintering range
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review