Evaluating REDD+ at subnational level: amazon fund impacts in Alta Floresta, Brazil
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Peruvian National Forest Conservation Program PES+ICDP decreased deforestation in other areas, but not within enrolled zones in the same community, as forests with low threats were chosen for enrollment.
“The Peruvian National Forest Conservation Program PES+ICDP decreased deforestation in other 508 areas, but not within enrolled zones in the same community, as forests with low threats were chosen for 509 enrollment.”
From A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome (2023) · cites this paper as [139]
The conservation effect of the Peruvian National Forest Conservation Program was only significant in the first year of the five-year contract.
“Furthermore, communities with historically high deforestation rates were underrepresented 510 and the conservation effect was only significant in the first year of the five-year contract [139].”
From A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome (2023) · cites this paper as [139]
Communities with historically high deforestation rates were underrepresented in the Peruvian National Forest Conservation Program.
“Furthermore, communities with historically high deforestation rates were underrepresented 510 and the conservation effect was only significant in the first year of the five-year contract [139].”
From A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome (2023) · cites this paper as [139]
Cites
The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque Country
Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803321455188 · Cited by 4,517 · see citing works
Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., Rodrigues, H., & Alencar, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246663 · Cited by 1,133 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic comparison of deforestation drivers and policy effectiveness across the Amazon biome
Hänggli, A., Levy, S. A., Armenteras, D., Bovolo, C. I., Brandão, J., Rueda, X., & Garrett, R. D. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acd408 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Correa, J., Cisneros, E., Börner, J., Pfaff, A., Costa, M., & Rajão, R.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Correa, Juliano
- Rajão, Raoni
- Venue
- Forest Policy and Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 116
- Pages
- 102178
- ISSN
- 1389-9341 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3016805824
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forest Policy and Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Keywords
- REDD+, Amazon Fund, deforestation, forest degradation, property rights, synthetic control method, counterfactual impact evaluation, honey production, milk production, Alta Floresta, Mato Grosso, smallholder farmers, forest carbon payments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
