The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA
Gill, P., Whitaker, J., Flaxman, C., Brown, N., & Buckleton, J. (2000) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00158-4 · Cited by 610
Self-citationForensic DNA Evidence Interpretation
(2004) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420037920 · Cited by 396
Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling
Clayton, T. M., Whitaker, J. P., Sparkes, R., & Gill, P. (1998) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(97)00175-8 · Cited by 285
Self-citationWeight‐of‐evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles
Balding, D. J. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470867693 · Cited by 244
Application of low copy number DNA profiling.
Gill, P. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 227
Self-citationWhitaker, J. P., Cotton, E. A., & Gill, P. (2001) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00557-6 · Cited by 192
Self-citationEvett, I. W., Jackson, G., & Lambert, J. A. (2000) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/s1355-0306(00)71926-5 · Cited by 178
Weir, B., Triggs, C., Starling, L., Stowell, L., Walsh, K., & Buckleton, J. (1997) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1520/jfs14100j · Cited by 174
Self-citationInterpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas
Gill, P., Sparkes, R., Pinchin, R., et al. (1998) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(97)00174-6 · Cited by 147
Self-citationGill, P. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki205 · Cited by 139
Self-citation
Cited by
Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation
Dror, I. E., & Hampikian, G. (2011) · Science & Justice · doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004 · Cited by 348
A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation
Meuwly, D., Ramos, D., & Haraksim, R. (2017) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.048 · Cited by 131
Westen, A. A., Nagel, J. H. A., Benschop, C. C. G., Weiler, N. E. C., De Jong, B. J., & Sijen, T. (2009) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01022.x · Cited by 58
NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis
Buckleton, J. S., Bright, J.-A., Cheng, K., Budowle, B., & Coble, M. D. (2018) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.014 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gill, P., Brenner, C. H., Buckleton, J. S., Carracedo, A., Krawczak, M., Mayr, W. R., Morling, N., Prinz, M., Schneider, P. M., & Weir, B. S.
- Venue
- Forensic Science International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 90-101
- ISSN
- 0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120523528
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.04.009
- The paper
- Gill, P., Brenner, C. H., Buckleton, J. S., Carracedo, A., Krawczak, M., Mayr, W. R., Morling, N., Prinz, M., Schneider, P. M., & Weir, B. S. (2006). DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. Forensic Science International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.04.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
