The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Further evaluation of the efficacy of contamination removal from bone surfaces
Abstract
Studies of low copy number (LCN) and degraded DNA are prone to contamination from exogenous DNA sources that in some cases out-compete endogenous DNA in PCR amplification, thus leading to false positives and/or aberrant results. Particularly problematic is contamination that is inadvertently deposited on the surfaces of bones through direct handling. Whereas some previous studies have shown that contamination removal is possible by subjecting samples to sodium hypochlorite prior to DNA extraction, others caution that such treatment can destroy a majority of the molecules endogenous to the sample. To further explore this topic, we experimentally contaminated ancient northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) ribs with human DNA and treated them with sodium hypochlorite to remove that contamination. Our findings are consistent with previous studies that found sodium hypochlorite to be highly efficient (~81-99%) at contamination removal; however, there emerged no treatment capable of removing 100% of the contamination across all of the experiments. Moreover, the ability to estimate the degree of damage to endogenous northern fur seal molecules was compromised due to the inherent variability of preserved mtDNA across the bones, and the presence of co-extracted PCR inhibitors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To prevent cross-contamination of DNA samples, bone samples were collected with extensive precautions according to previously published procedures [18–20].”
From Molecular Genealogy of a Mongol Queen’s Family and Her Possible Kinship with Genghis Khan (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Hofreiter, M. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.23.4793 · Cited by 684
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Pääbo, 1989, Ancient DNA: extraction, characterization, molecular cloning, and enzymatic amplification, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 86, 1939, 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1939 · DOI
- Pääbo, 1988, Mitochondrial DNA sequences from a 7000-year old brain, Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 9775, 10.1093/nar/16.20.9775 · DOI
- Hagelberg, 1991, Identification of the skeletal remains of a murder victim by DNA analysis, Nature, 352, 427, 10.1038/352427a0 · DOI
- Hagelberg, 1989, Ancient Bone DNA Amplified, Nature, 352, 427, 10.1038/352427a0 · DOI
- Jeffreys, 1992, Identification of the skeletal remains of Josef Mengele by DNA analysis, Forensic Sci. Int., 56, 65, 10.1016/0379-0738(92)90148-P · DOI
- Kemp, 2006, Repeat silica extraction: a simple technique for the removal of PCR inhibitors from DNA extracts, J. Archaeol. Sci., 33, 1680, 10.1016/j.jas.2006.02.015 · DOI
- Yang, 2003, Hypersensitive PCR, ancient human mtDNA, and contamination, Human Biol., 75, 355, 10.1353/hub.2003.0050 · DOI
- Kwok, 1989, Avoiding false positives with PCR, Nature, 339, 237, 10.1038/339237a0 · DOI
- Gilbert, 2007, Recharacterization of ancient DNA miscoding lesions: insights in the era of sequencing-by-synthesis, Nucleic Acids Res., 35, 1, 10.1093/nar/gkl483 · DOI
- Kemp, 2005, Use of bleach to eliminate contaminating DNA from the surfaces of bones and teeth, Forensic Sci. Int., 154, 53, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.017 · DOI
- Cooper, 2000, Ancient DNA: do it right or not at all, Science, 289, 1139, 10.1126/science.289.5482.1139b · DOI
- Kemp, 2010, Ancient DNA methodology: “thoughts from brian M. Kemp and David Glenn Smith on” mitochondrial DNA of protohistoric remains of an arikara population from South Dakota”, Human Biol., 82, 227
- Edson, 2004, Naming the dead-confronting the realities of rapid identification of degraded skeletal remains, Forensic Sci. Rev., 16, 64
- Yang, 2005, Contamination controls when preparing archaeological remains for ancient DNA analysis, J. Archaeol. Sci., 32, 331, 10.1016/j.jas.2004.09.008 · DOI
- NIJ, 1999, What every law enforcement officer should know about DNA evidence, Nat. Institue Justice
- Steadman, 2003, Latent print processing of human bones, J. Forensic Ident., 53, 556
- Mayo, 2004, Recovering human remains from clandestine graves, Evid. Technol. Mag., 2, 22
- Rutty, 2000, Human DNA contamination of mortuaries: does it matter?, J. Pathol., 190, 410, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200003)190:4<410::AID-PATH532>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
- Rutty, 2000, DNA contamination of mortuary instruments and work surfaces: a significant problem in forensic practice?, Int. J. Legal Med., 114, 56, 10.1007/s004140000142 · DOI
- Warrington, 2005, Who says you can’t do that? Crime scene contamination, Forensic Mag., 31
- Salamon, 2005, Relatively well preserved DNA is present in the crystal aggregates of fossil bones, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102, 13783, 10.1073/pnas.0503718102 · DOI
- Gilbert, 2006, Insights into the process behind the contamination of degraded human teeth and bone samples with exogenous sources of DNA, Int. J. Osteoaracheol., 16, 156, 10.1002/oa.832 · DOI
- Malmstrom, 2005, Extensive human DNA contamination in extracts from ancient dog bones and teeth, Mol. Biol. Evol., 22, 2040, 10.1093/molbev/msi195 · DOI
- Malmstrom, 2007, More on contamination: the use of asymmetric molecular behavior to identify authentic ancient human DNA, Mol. Biol. Evol., 24, 998, 10.1093/molbev/msm015 · DOI
- von Wurmb-Schwark, 2008, The impact of DNA contamination of bone samples in forensic case analysis and anthropological research, Leg. Med., 10, 125, 10.1016/j.legalmed.2007.10.001 · DOI
- Dissing, 2008, On the elimination of extraneous DNA in fossil human teeth with hypochlorite, J. Archaeol. Sci., 1445, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.10.009 · DOI
- Winters, 2011, To clone or not to clone: method analysis for retrieving consensus sequences in ancient DNA samples, PLoS ONE, 6, e21247, 10.1371/journal.pone.0021247 · DOI
- Barta, 2013, Mitochondrial DNA preservation across 3500 year old northern fur seal ribs is not related to bone density: implications for forensic investigations, Forensic Sci. Int.
- Kemp, 2007, Genetic analysis of early Holocene skeletal remains from Alaska and its implication for the settlement of the Americas, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 132, 605, 10.1002/ajpa.20543 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, 1981, Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome, Nature, 290, 457, 10.1038/290457a0 · DOI
- Andrews, 1999, Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA, Nat. Genet., 23, 147, 10.1038/13779 · DOI · Paper page
- Schwarz, 2009, New insights from old bones: DNA preservation and degradation in permafrost preserved mammoth remains, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, 3215, 10.1093/nar/gkp159 · DOI
- Pääbo, 2004, Genetic analyses from ancient DNA, Annu. Rev. Genet., 38, 645, 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143214 · DOI · Paper page
- Poinar, 2006, Metagenomics to paleogenomics: large-scale sequencing of mammoth DNA, Science, 311, 392, 10.1126/science.1123360 · DOI
- Garcia-Garcera, 2011, Fragmentation of contaminant and endogenous DNA in ancient samples determined by shotgun sequencing; prospects for human palaeogenomics, PLoS ONE, 6, e24161, 10.1371/journal.pone.0024161 · DOI
- Prince, 1992, PCR how to kill unwanted DNA, Biotechniques, 12, 358
Cited by
Molecular Genealogy of a Mongol Queen’s Family and Her Possible Kinship with Genghis Khan
Lkhagvasuren, G., Shin, H., Lee, S. E., Tumen, D., Kim, J.-H., Kim, K.-Y., Kim, K., Park, A. J., Lee, H. W., Kim, M. J., et al. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161622 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Barta, J. L., Monroe, C., & Kemp, B. M.
- Venue
- Forensic Science International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 231
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 340-348
- ISSN
- 0379-0738
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Office of Justice Programs
- U.S. Department of Justice
- National Institute of Justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review