Cited by 56Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contrasting insect activity and decomposition of pigs and humans in an Australian environment: A preliminary study

Open access
Dawson, Blake M., Barton, Philip S., Wallman, James F.·2020·Forensic Science International

Abstract

Non-human vertebrate animals, primarily domestic pigs, have been widely used in forensic science research as analogues for humans due to ethical and logistical constraints. Yet the suitability of pigs to mimic human decomposition and entomological patterns remains largely untested, and explicit comparative research in this area is lacking. We compared the decomposition rates and insect communities found at pig and human remains during summer and winter at the Australian Facility for Taphonomic Experimental Research (AFTER). Pigs decomposed faster than humans, with pigs entering active decay earlier in both summer and winter, and humans undergoing desiccation rather than skeletonisation. There was also a delay in the colonisation of humans by both flies and beetles. Species richness of these necrophagous taxa was between two and five times higher during the first two weeks of decomposition on pigs compared to humans during both summer and winter. Insect species composition was also significantly different between pigs and humans in each season. We interpret our findings to mean that the difference between humans and pigs, such as their mass, diet, medical history, or their microbiomes, might be causing different decomposition processes and altered timing or production of chemical cues for insect colonisation. Although preliminary, our results suggest that pigs might not be accurate substitutes for humans in particular fields of taphonomy and forensic entomology. Our findings a…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110515

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Mole, 2019, Animal models in forensic science research: justified use or ethical exploitation?, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 25, 1095, 10.1007/s11948-018-0053-1 · DOI
  2. Tomberlin, 2012, Assessment of decomposition studies indicates need for standardized and repeatable research methods in forensic entomology, J. Forensic Res., 3, 147, 10.4172/2157-7145.1000147 · DOI
  3. Payne, 1965, A summer carrion study of the baby pig Sus scrofa Linnaeus, Ecology, 46, 592, 10.2307/1934999 · DOI
  4. Anderson, 1996, Initial studies on insect sucession on carrion in southwestern British Columbia, J. Forensic Sci., 41, 617, 10.1520/JFS13964J · DOI
  5. Shean, 1993, Observations of differential decomposition on sun exposed v. shaded pig carrion in coastal Washignton State, J. Forensic Sci., 38, 938, 10.1520/JFS13492J · DOI
  6. De Jong, 1999, Decomposition and arthropod succession on exposed rabbit carrion during summer at high altitudes in Colorado, USA, J. Med. Entomol., 36, 833, 10.1093/jmedent/36.6.833 · DOI
  7. Voss, 2009, Annual and seasonal patterns of insect succession on decomposing remains at two locations in Western Australia, Forensic Sci. Int., 193, 26, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.08.014 · DOI
  8. Reed, 1958, A study of dog carcass communities in Tennessee, with special reference to the insects, Am. Midl. Nat., 59, 213, 10.2307/2422385 · DOI
  9. Ahmad, 2011, Comparative insect fauna succession on indoor and outdoor monkey carrions in a semi-forested area in Malaysia, Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 1, S232, 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60161-5 · DOI
  10. Braack, 1987, Community dynamics of carrion-attendant arthropods in tropical African woodland, Oecologia, 72, 402, 10.1007/BF00377571 · DOI
  11. Blackith, 1990, Insect infestations of small corpses, J. Nat. Hist., 24, 699, 10.1080/00222939000770481 · DOI
  12. Carvalho, 2004, Observations on the succession patterns of necrophagous insects on a pig carcass in an urban area of Southeastern Brazil, Aggrawals Internet J. Forensic Med. Toxicol., 5, 33
  13. Stokes, 2013, Human versus animal: contrasting decomposition dynamics of mammalian analogues in experimental taphonomy, J. Forensic Sci., 58, 583, 10.1111/1556-4029.12115 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Schoenly, 2007, Comparative performance and complementarity of four sampling methods and arthropod preference tests from human and porcine remains at the Forensic Anthropology Center in Knoxville, Tennessee, J. Med. Entomol., 44, 881, 10.1093/jmedent/44.5.881 · DOI
  15. Wang, 2017, Insect succession on remains of human and animals in Shenzhen, China, Forensic Sci. Int., 271, 75, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.12.032 · DOI
  16. Barton, 2020, Soil chemical markers distinguishing human and pig decomposition islands: a preliminary study, Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol., 10.1007/s12024-020-00297-2 · DOI
  17. Douglas, 1972, Of pigs and men and research, Space Life Sci., 3, 226
  18. Matuszewski, 2010, Insect succession and carrion decomposition in selected forests of Central Europe. Part 1: pattern and rate of decomposition, Forensic Sci. Int., 194, 85, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.10.016 · DOI
  19. Sukchit, 2015, Decomposition stages and carrion insect succession on dressed hanging pig carcasses in Nan Province, Northern Thailand, Trop. Nat. Hist., 15, 137
  20. Matuszewski, 2020, Pigs vs people: the use of pigs as analogues for humans in forensic entomology and taphonomy research, Int. J. Legal Med., 134, 793, 10.1007/s00414-019-02074-5 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Connor, 2017, Testing the use of pigs as human proxies in decomposition studies, J. Forensic Sci., 63, 1350, 10.1111/1556-4029.13727 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Dautartas, 2018, Differential decomposition among pig, rabbit, and human remains, J. Forensic Sci., 63, 1673, 10.1111/1556-4029.13784 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Knobel, 2019, A comparison of human and pig decomposition rates and odour profiles in an Australian environment, Aust. J. Forensic Sci., 51, 557, 10.1080/00450618.2018.1439100 · DOI
  24. Archer, 2003, Annual variation in arrival and departure times of carrion insects at carcasses: implications for succession studies in forensic entomology, Aust. J. Zool., 51, 569, 10.1071/ZO03053 · DOI
  25. Matuszewski, 2010, Insect succession and carrion decomposition in selected forests of Central Europe. Part 2: composition and residency patterns of carrion fauna, Forensic Sci. Int., 195, 42, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.11.007 · DOI
  26. Sharanowski, 2008, Insect succession and decomposition patterns on shaded and sunlit carrion in Saskatchewan in three different seasons, Forensic Sci. Int., 179, 219, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.05.019 · DOI
  27. Tomberlin, 2011, A roadmap for bridging basic and applied research in forensic entomology, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 56, 401, 10.1146/annurev-ento-051710-103143 · DOI
  28. Kalinová, 2009, Irresistible bouquet of death—how are burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae: Nicrophorus) attracted by carcasses, Naturwissenschaften, 96, 889, 10.1007/s00114-009-0545-6 · DOI
  29. Von Hoermann, 2011, The importance of carcass volatiles as attractants for the hide beetle Dermestes maculatus (De Geer), Forensic Sci. Int., 212, 173, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.06.009 · DOI
  30. Javan, 2019, An interdisciplinary review of the thanatomicrobiome in human decomposition, Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol., 15, 75, 10.1007/s12024-018-0061-0 · DOI
  31. Benbow, 2019, Necrobiome framework for bridging decomposition ecology of autotrophically and heterotrophically derived organic matter, Ecol. Monogr., 89, 10.1002/ecm.1331 · DOI
  32. Pechal, 2016, Microbial ecology of the salmon necrobiome: evidence salmon carrion decomposition influences aquatic and terrestrial insect microbiomes, Environ. Microbiol., 18, 1511, 10.1111/1462-2920.13187 · DOI
  33. Wallman, 2017, Body farms, Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol., 13, 487, 10.1007/s12024-017-9932-z · DOI
  34. Megyesi, 2005, Using accumulated degree-days to estimate the postmortem interval from decomposed human remains, J. Forensic Sci., 50, 618, 10.1520/JFS2004017 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Michaud, 2012, Sampling flies or sampling flaws? Experimental design and inference strength in forensic entomology, J. Med. Entomol., 49, 1, 10.1603/ME10229 · DOI
  36. Brown, 2016, A review of extensive variation in the design of pitfall traps and a proposal for a standard pitfall trap design for monitoring ground‐active arthropod biodiversity, Ecol. Evol., 6, 3953, 10.1002/ece3.2176 · DOI
  37. Lackner, 2017, A monograph of the Australopacific Saprininae (Coleoptera, Histeridae), ZooKeys, 689, 1, 10.3897/zookeys.689.12021 · DOI
  38. Meiklejohn, 2013, A key to the Australian Sarcophagidae (Diptera) with special emphasis on Sarcophaga (sensu lato), Zootaxa, 3680, 148
  39. Peck, 2001, Review of the carrion beetles of Australia and New Guinea (Coleoptera: Silphidae), Aust. Entomol., 40, 93, 10.1046/j.1440-6055.2001.00216.x · DOI
  40. Scholtz, 1986, Revision of the genus Trox Fabricius (Coleoptera: Trogidae) of the Australasian region, Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser., 34, 1, 10.1071/AJZS125 · DOI
  41. Wallman, 2001, A key to the adults of species of blowflies in southern Australia known or suspected to breed in carrion [corrigendum in Med. Vet. Entomol. 16, 233], Med. Vet. Entomol., 15, 433, 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00331.x · DOI
  42. Wallman, 2001, Third-instar larvae of common carrion-breeding blowflies of the genus Calliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in South Australia, Invertebr. Syst., 15, 37, 10.1071/IT99024 · DOI
  43. Meiklejohn, 2011, DNA-based identification of forensically important Australian Sarcophagidae (Diptera), Int. J. Legal Med., 125, 27, 10.1007/s00414-009-0395-y · DOI
  44. Keough, 2017, Scoring of decomposition: a proposed amendment to the method when using a pig model for human studies, J. Forensic Sci., 62, 986, 10.1111/1556-4029.13390 · DOI
  45. Singh, 2018, Temporal and spatial impact of human cadaver decomposition on soil bacterial and arthropod community structure and function, Front. Microbiol., 8, 2616, 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02616 · DOI
  46. Matuszewski, 2016, Effect of body mass and clothing on carrion entomofauna, Int. J. Legal Med., 130, 221, 10.1007/s00414-015-1145-y · DOI · Paper page
  47. Matuszewski, 2014, Effect of body mass and clothing on decomposition of pig carcasses, Int. J. Legal Med., 128, 1039, 10.1007/s00414-014-0965-5 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Hayman, 2016, Peri-mortem disease treatment: a little known cause of error in the estimation of the time since death in decomposing human remains, Aust. J. Forensic Sci., 48, 171, 10.1080/00450618.2015.1042048 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Archer, 2003, Female breeding-site preferences and larval feeding strategies of carrion-breeding Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae (Diptera): a quantitative analysis, Aust. J. Zool., 51, 165, 10.1071/ZO02067 · DOI
  50. Frese, 2015, Diet shapes the gut microbiome of pigs during nursing and weaning, Microbiome, 3, 28, 10.1186/s40168-015-0091-8 · DOI
  51. David, 2014, Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome, Nature, 505, 559, 10.1038/nature12820 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Hildebrand, 2012, A comparative analysis of the intestinal metagenomes present in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) and humans (Homo sapiens), BMC Genom., 13, 514, 10.1186/1471-2164-13-514 · DOI
  53. Human Microbiome Project Consortium, 2012, Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome, Nature, 486, 207, 10.1038/nature11234 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Pechal, 2018, A large-scale survey of the postmortem human microbiome, and its potential to provide insight into the living health condition, Sci. Rep., 8, 10.1038/s41598-018-23989-w · DOI
  55. Hyde, 2015, Initial insights into bacterial succession during human decomposition, Int. J. Legal Med., 129, 661, 10.1007/s00414-014-1128-4 · DOI
  56. Liu, 2016, Response of Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) to compounds from microbial decomposition of larval resources, Anim. Behav., 115, 217, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.03.022 · DOI
  57. Roberts, 2015, A taphonomic study exploring the differences in decomposition rate and manner between frozen and never frozen domestic pigs (Sus scrofa), J. Forensic Sci., 60, 588, 10.1111/1556-4029.12717 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dawson, B. M., Barton, P. S., & Wallman, J. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • Federation University (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Dawson, Blake M.
Venue
Forensic Science International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
316
Pages
110515
ISSN
0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087698201
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Forensic Science International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Wollongong
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
human remains decomposition, necrophagous insects, forensic entomology, decomposition rate, insect species richness, taphonomy
MeSH terms
Forensic Entomology, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Australia, Coleoptera, Diptera, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postmortem Changes, Seasons, Swine, Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review