Cited by 53Vitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressVitamin D Research Studies

Vitamin C supplementation for diabetes management: A comprehensive narrative review

Mason, Shaun A., Parker, Lewan, van der Pligt, Paige, Wadley, Glenn D.·2023·Free Radical Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that vitamin C supplementation may be an effective adjunct therapy in the management of people with diabetes. This paper critically reviews the current evidence on effects of vitamin C supplementation and its potential mechanisms in diabetes management. Evidence from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show favourable effects of vitamin C on glycaemic control and blood pressure that may be clinically meaningful, and mixed effects on blood lipids and endothelial function. However, evidence is mostly of low evidence certainty. Emerging evidence is promising for effects of vitamin C supplementation on some diabetes complications, particularly diabetic foot ulcers. However, there is a notable lack of robust and well-designed studies exploring effects of vitamin C as a single compound supplement on diabetes prevention and patient-important outcomes (i.e. prevention and amelioration of diabetes complications). RCTs are also required to investigate potential preventative or ameliorative effects of vitamin C on gestational diabetes outcomes. Oral vitamin C doses of 500-1000 mg per day are potentially effective, safe, and affordable for many individuals with diabetes. However, personalisation of supplementation regimens that consider factors such as vitamin C status, disease status, current glycaemic control, vitamin C intake, redox status, and genotype is important to optimize vitamin C's therapeutic effects safely. Finally, given a high pre…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.12.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 405 · Cited by 53

Authors
Mason, S. A., Parker, L., van der Pligt, P., & Wadley, G. D.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Mason, Shaun A.
Venue
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
194
Pages
255-283
ISSN
0891-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312115197
Cited by
53
References
405
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Free Radical Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia (GNT1157930)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
Keywords
vitamin C supplementation, diabetes management, glycemic control, blood pressure, serum lipids, endothelial function, diabetic foot ulcer, diabetes complications, gestational diabetes mellitus, scurvy, plasma vitamin C concentration, redox state, genotypes, personalized supplementation
MeSH terms
Ascorbic Acid, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Vitamins, Diabetes, Gestational, Diabetic Foot, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review