Vitamin C supplementation for diabetes management: A comprehensive narrative review
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that vitamin C supplementation may be an effective adjunct therapy in the management of people with diabetes. This paper critically reviews the current evidence on effects of vitamin C supplementation and its potential mechanisms in diabetes management. Evidence from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show favourable effects of vitamin C on glycaemic control and blood pressure that may be clinically meaningful, and mixed effects on blood lipids and endothelial function. However, evidence is mostly of low evidence certainty. Emerging evidence is promising for effects of vitamin C supplementation on some diabetes complications, particularly diabetic foot ulcers. However, there is a notable lack of robust and well-designed studies exploring effects of vitamin C as a single compound supplement on diabetes prevention and patient-important outcomes (i.e. prevention and amelioration of diabetes complications). RCTs are also required to investigate potential preventative or ameliorative effects of vitamin C on gestational diabetes outcomes. Oral vitamin C doses of 500-1000 mg per day are potentially effective, safe, and affordable for many individuals with diabetes. However, personalisation of supplementation regimens that consider factors such as vitamin C status, disease status, current glycaemic control, vitamin C intake, redox status, and genotype is important to optimize vitamin C's therapeutic effects safely. Finally, given a high pre…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vitamin C supplementation dramatically lowers plasma malondialdehyde levels in individuals with T2DM.
“Vitamin C supplementation dramatically lowers plasma malondialdehyde (toxic and biological marker for OS) levels in individuals with T2DM (77, 78).”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 405 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Mason, S. A., Parker, L., van der Pligt, P., & Wadley, G. D.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Mason, Shaun A.
- Venue
- Free Radical Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 194
- Pages
- 255-283
- ISSN
- 0891-5849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4312115197
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 405
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Free Radical Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart Foundation of Australia (GNT1157930)
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
- Keywords
- vitamin C supplementation, diabetes management, glycemic control, blood pressure, serum lipids, endothelial function, diabetic foot ulcer, diabetes complications, gestational diabetes mellitus, scurvy, plasma vitamin C concentration, redox state, genotypes, personalized supplementation
- MeSH terms
- Ascorbic Acid, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Vitamins, Diabetes, Gestational, Diabetic Foot, Dietary Supplements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review