The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on the application of Bacillus as probiotics in aquaculture
Abstract
&NA; Probiotics use in aquaculture has gained attention as microbial candidates to maintain the health and the well‐being of many aquaculture animals. Among the many microbial candidates, probiotic Bacillus has sporulation capacity that makes them survive harsh environmental conditions, are non‐pathogenic and non‐toxic when fed to fish, and can produce antimicrobial substances making them more suitable candidates compared to other probiotics. In this review, we discussed the necessity of using the probiotic Bacillus in sustainable aquaculture as a good alternative to improve feed utilization, stress response, immune response and disease resistance, maintenance of tissue integrity, and as well improvement of water quality for sustainable aquaculture. Therefore the findings of current researches about the effects of Bacillus application to improve the culture of aquatic animals for future research and development of Bacillus application in aquaculture have been summarised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Abdollahi, D., Soltani, E., Jafaryan, H., Soltani, M., Samani, M. N., & Campa‐Córdova, Á. I. (2018) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.082 · Cited by 50
RetractedProbiotic Bacteria as Biological Control Agents in Aquaculture
Verschuere, L., Rombaut, G., Sorgeloos, P., & Verstraete, W. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.655-671.2000 · Cited by 2,283
Camargo, J. A., & Alonso, Á. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002 · Cited by 2,248
Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions
Stein, T. (2005) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x · Cited by 1,507
Probiotics and immunity: A fish perspective
Nayak, S. K. (2010) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2010.02.017 · Cited by 1,253
The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids
Merrifield, D. L., Dimitroglou, A., Foey, A., Davies, S. J., Baker, R. T. M., Bøgwald, J., Castex, M., & Ringø, E. (2010) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.02.007 · Cited by 995
Immunological Control of Fish Diseases
Magnadottir, B. (2010) · Marine Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10126-010-9279-x · Cited by 771
Aly, S. M., Abdel-Galil Ahmed, Y., Abdel-Aziz Ghareeb, A., & Mohamed, M. F. (2008) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2008.03.013 · Cited by 684
Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins
Abriouel, H., Franz, C. M. A. P., Omar, N. B., & Gálvez, A. (2011) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00244.x · Cited by 629
Use of Probiotics in Aquaculture
Martínez Cruz, P., Ibáñez, A. L., Monroy Hermosillo, O. A., & Ramírez Saad, H. C. (2012) · ISRN Microbiology · doi:10.5402/2012/916845 · Cited by 541
Cited by
Liao, Z., Liu, Y., Wei, H., He, X., Wang, Z., Zhuang, Z., Zhao, W., Masagounder, K., He, J., & Niu, J. (2023) · Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2023.05.016 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuebutornye, F. K. A., Abarike, E. D., & Lu, Y.
- Venue
- Fish & Shellfish Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 87
- Pages
- 820-828
- ISSN
- 1050-4648 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2913209293
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 18.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on the application of Bacillus as probiotics in aquaculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.02.010
- The paper
- Kuebutornye, F. K. A., Abarike, E. D., & Lu, Y. (2019). A review on the application of Bacillus as probiotics in aquaculture. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.02.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
