The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins
Open accessAbstract
Members of the genus Bacillus are known to produce a wide arsenal of antimicrobial substances, including peptide and lipopeptide antibiotics, and bacteriocins. Many of the Bacillus bacteriocins belong to the lantibiotics, a category of post-translationally modified peptides widely disseminated among different bacterial clades. Lantibiotics are among the best-characterized antimicrobial peptides at the levels of peptide structure, genetic determinants and biosynthesis mechanisms. Members of the genus Bacillus also produce many other nonmodified bacteriocins, some of which resemble the pediocin-like bacteriocins of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB), while others show completely novel peptide sequences. Bacillus bacteriocins are increasingly becoming more important due to their sometimes broader spectra of inhibition (as compared with most LAB bacteriocins), which may include Gram-negative bacteria, yeasts or fungi, in addition to Gram-positive species, some of which are known to be pathogenic to humans and/or animals. The present review provides a general overview of Bacillus bacteriocins, including primary structure, biochemical and genetic characterization, classification and potential applications in food preservation as natural preservatives and in human and animal health as alternatives to conventional antibiotics. Furthermore, it addresses their environmental applications, such as bioprotection against the pre- and post-harvest decay of vegetables, or as plant growth promoters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation.
Cleveland, J., Montville, T. J., Nes, I. F., & Chikindas, M. L. (2001) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00560-8 · Cited by 1,835
Cited by
Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species
Fira, D., Dimkić, I., Berić, T., Lozo, J., & Stanković, S. (2018) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.044 · Cited by 917
A review on the application of Bacillus as probiotics in aquaculture
Kuebutornye, F. K. A., Abarike, E. D., & Lu, Y. (2019) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2019.02.010 · Cited by 555
Torres, N. I., Noll, K. S., Xu, S., Li, J., Huang, Q., Sinko, P. J., Wachsman, M. B., & Chikindas, M. L. (2013) · Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins · doi:10.1007/s12602-012-9123-x · Cited by 122
Golnari, M., Bahrami, N., Milanian, Z., Rabbani Khorasgani, M., Asadollahi, M. A., Shafiei, R., & Fatemi, S. S.-A. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51823-z · Cited by 86
Khatri, I., Sharma, G., & Subramanian, S. (2019) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-019-1680-7 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Abriouel, H., Franz, C. M. A. P., Omar, N. B., & Gálvez, A.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-232
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W2155905840
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00244.x
- The paper
- Abriouel, H., Franz, C. M. A. P., Omar, N. B., & Gálvez, A. (2011). Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00244.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.