The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA
Gill, P., Whitaker, J., Flaxman, C., Brown, N., & Buckleton, J. (2000) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00158-4 · Cited by 610
Self-citationBalding, D. J., & Nichols, R. A. (1994) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/0379-0738(94)90222-4 · Cited by 491
Sequence Analysis and Characterization of Stutter Products at the Tetranucleotide Repeat Locus VWA
Walsh, P. S., Fildes, N. J., & Reynolds, R. (1996) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/24.14.2807 · Cited by 411
Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation
(2004) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420037920 · Cited by 396
Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling
Clayton, T. M., Whitaker, J. P., Sparkes, R., & Gill, P. (1998) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(97)00175-8 · Cited by 285
Validating TrueAllele® DNA Mixture Interpretation*,†
Perlin, M. W., Legler, M. M., Spencer, C. E., Smith, J. L., Allan, W. P., Belrose, J. L., & Duceman, B. W. (2011) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01859.x · Cited by 227
Budowle, B., Onorato, A. J., Callaghan, T. F., Manna, A. D., Gross, A. M., Guerrieri, R. A., Luttman, J. C., & McClure, D. L. (2009) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01046.x · Cited by 147
Developing allelic and stutter peak height models for a continuous method of DNA interpretation
Bright, J., Taylor, D., Curran, J. M., et al. (2013) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.11.013 · Cited by 147
Self-citationCharacterising stutter in forensic STR multiplexes
Brookes, C., Bright, J.-A., Harbison, S., & Buckleton, J. (2012) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.02.001 · Cited by 145
Self-citationLoComatioN: A software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles
Gill, P., Kirkham, A. J., & Curran, J. M. (2006) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.04.016 · Cited by 107
Cited by
A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation
Meuwly, D., Ramos, D., & Haraksim, R. (2017) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.048 · Cited by 131
NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis
Buckleton, J. S., Bright, J.-A., Cheng, K., Budowle, B., & Coble, M. D. (2018) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.014 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, D., Bright, J.-A., & Buckleton, J.
- Venue
- Forensic Science International: Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 516-528
- ISSN
- 1872-4973 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014877745
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 16.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.011
- The paper
- Taylor, D., Bright, J.-A., & Buckleton, J. (2013). The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. Forensic Science International: Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
