Cited by 62Biofuel production and bioconversionAlgal biology and biofuel productionEnzyme Production and Characterization

Enzymatic hydrolysis of microalgal cellulose for bioethanol production, modeling and sensitivity analysis

Shokrkar, Hanieh, Ebrahimi, Sirous, Zamani, Mehdi·2018·Fuel

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.143

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shokrkar, H., Ebrahimi, S., & Zamani, M.
Affiliations
Sahand University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Ebrahimi, Sirous
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
228
Pages
30-38
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800676679
Cited by
62
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fuel (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
Keywords
enzymatic hydrolysis, bioethanol production, kinetic modeling, product inhibition, cellobiose hydrolysis, glucose yield, sensitivity analysis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review