The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on the progress and prospects of oxy-fuel carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology
Abstract
Abstract Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies have emerged as a promising technique to prevent greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuel-fired power plants. In recent years oxy-fuel combustion-based CCS technique has gained a lot of attention and consideration because of its cost-effective CO2 capture. The present review article outlines the progress made in carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) based on oxy-fuel combustion by incorporating an air separation unit (ASU) and carbon dioxide purification and compression unit (CPU). The present article discusses the major components of the oxy-fuel combustion power plant and compares various novel configurations of oxy-fuel power generation systems in terms of energy penalty, auxiliary energy consumption, CO2 purity, and CO2 capture efficiency. This review also focuses on modifications to oxy-fuel combustion power generation systems such as pressurized oxy-fuel combustion, flue gas enriched oxy-fuel combustion, and few advanced oxy-fuel configurations. This review article has addressed the techno-economic and thermodynamic aspects of the oxy-fuel combustion-based carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-00894-8 · Cited by 2,895
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies
Adanez, J., Abad, A., Garcia-Labiano, F., Gayan, P., & de Diego, L. F. (2012) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.001 · Cited by 2,230
Membrane Gas Separation: A Review/State of the Art
Bernardo, P., Drioli, E., & Golemme, G. (2009) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie8019032 · Cited by 2,147
Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation
Buhre, B. J. P., Elliott, L. K., Sheng, C. D., Gupta, R. P., & Wall, T. F. (2005) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2005.07.001 · Cited by 1,542
Mixed ionic–electronic conducting (MIEC) ceramic-based membranes for oxygen separation
Sunarso, J., Baumann, S., Serra, J. M., Meulenberg, W. A., Liu, S., Lin, Y. S., & Diniz da Costa, J. C. (2008) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.074 · Cited by 1,152
Chen, L., Yong, S. Z., & Ghoniem, A. F. (2012) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.003 · Cited by 974
An overview on oxyfuel coal combustion—State of the art research and technology development
Wall, T., Liu, Y., Spero, C., Elliott, L., Khare, S., Rathnam, R., Zeenathal, F., Moghtaderi, B., Buhre, B., Sheng, C., et al. (2009) · Chemical Engineering Research and Design · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2009.02.005 · Cited by 803
The CO2 economy: Review of CO2 capture and reuse technologies
Koytsoumpa, E. I., Bergins, C., & Kakaras, E. (2018) · The Journal of Supercritical Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029 · Cited by 736
Pollutants from the combustion of solid biomass fuels
Williams, A., Jones, J. M., Ma, L., & Pourkashanian, M. (2012) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.10.001 · Cited by 635
Cited by
Advancements in carbon capture technologies: A review
Dubey, A., & Arora, A. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133932 · Cited by 303
Overview of the e-Fuels Market, Projects, and the State of the Art of Production Facilities
Dybiński, O., Szabłowski, Ł., Martsinchyk, A., Szczęśniak, A., Milewski, J., Grzebielec, A., & Shuhayeu, P. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18030552 · Cited by 27
Li, Y., Zhang, G., Liu, J., Li, G., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Journal of the Energy Institute · doi:10.1016/j.joei.2023.101415 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Yadav, S., & Mondal, S. S.
- Venue
- Fuel
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 308
- Pages
- 122057
- ISSN
- 0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3202665153
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 27.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on the progress and prospects of oxy-fuel carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122057
- The paper
- Yadav, S., & Mondal, S. S. (2022). A review on the progress and prospects of oxy-fuel carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
