CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 69

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on prominent animal and municipal wastes as potential feedstocks for solar pyrolysis for biochar production

Parthasarathy, Prakash, Al-Ansari, Tareq, Mackey, Hamish R., Sheeba Narayanan, K., McKay, Gordon·2022·Fuel
DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123378
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123378

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 161

  1. Maity, 2015, Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: part I, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 43, 1427, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.092 · DOI
  2. Demirbas, 2011, Waste management, waste resource facilities and waste conversion processes, Energy Convers Manag, 52, 1280, 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.025 · DOI
  3. Shahbaz, 2020, A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 134, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110382 · DOI
  4. AlNouss, 2020, Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of coconut coir pith-biomass gasification using ASPEN PLUS, Appl Energy, 261, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114350 · DOI
  5. Parthasarathy, 2017, Optimization of Parameters for the Generation of Hydrogen in Combined Slow Pyrolysis and Steam Gasification of Biomass, Energy Fuels, 31, 13692, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02429 · DOI
  6. Lohri, 2017, Treatment technologies for urban solid biowaste to create value products: a review with focus on low- and middle-income settings, Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol, 16, 81, 10.1007/s11157-017-9422-5 · DOI
  7. Elkhalifa S, AlNouss A, Al-Ansari T, Mackey HR, Parthasarathy P, Mckay G. Simulation of Food Waste Pyrolysis for the Production of Biochar: A Qatar Case Study. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng., vol. 46, Elsevier B.V.; 2019, p. 901–6. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50151-X. · DOI
  8. Shahbaz, 2020, Investigation of biomass components on the slow pyrolysis products yield using Aspen Plus for techno-economic analysis, Biomass Convers Biorefinery
  9. Al-Ansari T, AlNouss A, Al-Thani N, Parthasarathy P, ElKhalifa S, Mckay G, et al. Optimising Multi Biomass Feedstock Utilisation Considering a Multi Technology Approach. vol. 48. 2020. 10.1016/B978-0-12-823377-1.50273-1. · DOI
  10. Parthasarathy, 2017, Generation of fuel char through biomass slow pyrolysis, Energy Sources, Part A Recover Util Environ Eff, 39, 599
  11. Arribas, 2017, Solar-driven pyrolysis and gasification of low-grade carbonaceous materials, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 42, 13598, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.026 · DOI
  12. Anniwaer, 2021, Steam co-gasification of Japanese cedarwood and its commercial biochar for hydrogen-rich gas production, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, 34587, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.032 · DOI
  13. Yoo, 2015, A study on torrefaction characteristics of waste sawdust in an auger type pyrolyzer. 2nd 3R Int, Sci. Conf. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., Daejeon, Republic of Korea.: Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM), 275
  14. Parthasarathy, 2018, Comparison study of fuel characteristics of slow pyrolyzed chars with Neyveli lignite, Energy Sources, Part A Recover Util Environ Eff, 40, 523
  15. Gupta, 2016, The effect of temperature and hemicellulose-lignin, cellulose-lignin, and cellulose-hemicellulose on char yield from the slow pyrolysis of rice husk, Energy Sources, Part A Recover Util Environ Eff, 38, 1428
  16. Prakash, 2015, Experimental studies on biomass pyrolysis using microwave radiation, Energy Sources, Part A Recover Util Environ Eff, 37, 2675
  17. Zhou, 2021, An understanding for improved biomass pyrolysis: Toward a systematic comparison of different acid pretreatments, Chem Eng J, 411, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128513 · DOI
  18. Sobek, 2020, Kinetic modelling of waste wood devolatilization during pyrolysis based on thermogravimetric data and solar pyrolysis reactor performance, Fuel, 261, 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116459 · DOI
  19. Haefele, 2011, Effects and fate of biochar from rice residues in rice-based systems, F Crop Res, 121, 430, 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.014 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Sanahuja-Parejo, 2019, Drop-in biofuels from the co-pyrolysis of grape seeds and polystyrene, Chem Eng J, 377, 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.183 · DOI
  21. Nieva Lobos, 2016, Biochar from pyrolysis of cellulose: An alternative catalyst support for the electro-oxidation of methanol, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 41, 10695, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.041 · DOI
  22. Fowles, 2007, Black carbon sequestration as an alternative to bioenergy, Biomass Bioenergy, 31, 426, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.012 · DOI
  23. Laird, 2008, The Charcoal Vision: A Win–Win–Win Scenario for Simultaneously Producing Bioenergy, Permanently Sequestering Carbon, while Improving Soil and Water Quality, Agron J, 100, 178, 10.2134/agronj2007.0161 · DOI
  24. Kim H Bin, Kim JG, Kim T, Alessi DS, Baek K. Interaction of biochar stability and abiotic aging: Influences of pyrolysis reaction medium and temperature. Chem Eng J 2021;411:128441. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128441. · DOI
  25. Yu, 2020, Steam gasification of biochars derived from pruned apple branch with various pyrolysis temperatures, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 45, 18321, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.226 · DOI
  26. Alherbawi, 2021, Potential of drop-in biofuel production from camel manure by hydrothermal liquefaction and biocrude upgrading: A Qatar case study, Energy, 232, 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121027 · DOI
  27. Ciuta, 2018, Enthalpy changes during pyrolysis of biomass: Interpretation of intraparticle gas sampling, Appl Energy, 228, 1985, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.061 · DOI
  28. Abnisa, 2014, A review on co-pyrolysis of biomass: An optional technique to obtain a high-grade pyrolysis oil, Energy Convers Manag, 87, 71, 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Ndukwu, 2021, Review of solar-biomass pyrolysis systems: Focus on the configuration of thermal-solar systems and reactor orientation, J King Saud Univ - Eng Sci, 33, 413, 10.1016/j.jksues.2020.05.004 · DOI
  30. Campos Roldán, 2021, Metal-free electrocatalysts obtained from agave waste by solar pyrolysis for oxygen reduction reaction, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, 26101, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.095 · DOI
  31. Sobek, 2021, Solar pyrolysis of waste biomass: A comparative study of products distribution, in situ heating behavior, and application of model-free kinetic predictions, Fuel, 292, 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120365 · DOI
  32. Zeng, 2017, Combined effects of initial water content and heating parameters on solar pyrolysis of beech wood, Energy, 125, 552, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.173 · DOI
  33. Zeng, 2016, Modeling of beech wood pellet pyrolysis under concentrated solar radiation, Renew Energy, 99, 721, 10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.051 · DOI
  34. Chuayboon, 2020, An overview of solar decarbonization processes, reacting oxide materials, and thermochemical reactors for hydrogen and syngas production, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 45, 25783, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.098 · DOI
  35. Lédé, 1999, Solar thermochemical conversion of biomass, Sol Energy, 65, 3, 10.1016/S0038-092X(98)00109-1 · DOI
  36. Rahman, 2020, Valorizing of weeds algae through the solar assisted pyrolysis: Effects of dependable parameters on yields and characterization of products, Renew Energy, 147, 937, 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.046 · DOI
  37. Barbosa, 2021, A study of optimization of solar pyrolysis and catalyst recovery and reuse, Energy Convers Manag, 237, 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114094 · DOI
  38. Joardder MUH, Halder PK, Rahim MA, Masud MH. Solar pyrolysis: Converting waste into asset using solar energy. Clean Energy Sustain. Dev. Comp. Contrasts New Approaches, Elsevier Inc.; 2017, p. 213–35. 10.1016/B978-0-12-805423-9.00008-9. · DOI
  39. Rahman, 2021, Concentrating technologies with reactor integration and effect of process variables on solar assisted pyrolysis: A critical review, Therm Sci Eng Prog, 25
  40. Hamilton, 2020, A systematic review of solar driven waste to fuel pyrolysis technology for the Australian state of Victoria, Energy Rep, 6, 3212, 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.039 · DOI
  41. Chintala, 2018, Production, upgradation and utilization of solar assisted pyrolysis fuels from biomass – A technical review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 90, 120, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.066 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Zeng, 2017, Solar pyrolysis of carbonaceous feedstocks: A review, Sol Energy, 156, 73, 10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.033 · DOI
  43. Weldekidan, 2018, Review of solar energy for biofuel extraction, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 88, 184, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.027 · DOI
  44. Sobek, 2020, Solar pyrolysis of waste biomass: Part 2 kinetic modeling and methodology of the determination of the kinetic parameters for solar pyrolysis of sewage sludge, Renew Energy, 153, 962, 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.061 · DOI
  45. Joardder MUH, Halder PK, Rahim MA, Masud MH. Solar pyrolysis: Converting waste into asset using solar energy. In: Rasul MG, Azad AK, Sharma SC, editors. Clean Energy Sustain. Dev. Comp. Contrasts New Approaches, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Inc.; 2017, p. 213–35. 10.1016/B978-0-12-805423-9.00008-9. · DOI
  46. Morales, 2014, Solar biomass pyrolysis for the production of bio-fuels and chemical commodities, J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 109, 65, 10.1016/j.jaap.2014.07.012 · DOI
  47. Nixon, 2010, Which is the best solar thermal collection technology for electricity generation in north-west India? Evaluation of options using the analytical hierarchy process, Energy, 35, 5230, 10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.042 · DOI
  48. Nzihou, 2012, Synthetic fuels from biomass using concentrated solar energy - A review, Energy, 42, 121, 10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.077 · DOI
  49. Zeaiter, 2015, Design of an automated solar concentrator for the pyrolysis of scrap rubber, Energy Convers Manag, 101, 118, 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.05.019 · DOI
  50. Xie, 2011, Concentrated solar energy applications using Fresnel lenses: A review, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 15, 2588, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.03.031 · DOI
  51. Zeng, 2015, Solar Pyrolysis of Wood in a Lab-scale Solar Reactor: Influence of Temperature and Sweep Gas Flow Rate on Products Distribution, Energy Procedia, 69, 1849, 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.163 · DOI
  52. Yadav, 2016, A review of solar thermochemical processes, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 54, 497, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.026 · DOI
  53. Joardder, 2014, Solar Assisted Fast Pyrolysis: A Novel Approach of Renewable Energy Production, J Eng (United Kingdom), 2014, 1
  54. Chen, 2020, Upgrading of bio-oil via solar pyrolysis of the biomass pretreated with aqueous phase bio-oil washing, solar drying, and solar torrefaction, Bioresour Technol, 305, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123130 · DOI
  55. Weldekidan, 2018, Waste to Energy Conversion of Chicken Litter through a Solar-Driven Pyrolysis Process, Energy Fuels, 32, 4341, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02977 · DOI
  56. Chintala, 2017, Solar thermal pyrolysis of non-edible seeds to biofuels and their feasibility assessment, Energy Convers Manag, 153, 482, 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.029 · DOI
  57. Weldekidan, 2020, Distribution of solar pyrolysis products and product gas composition produced from agricultural residues and animal wastes at different operating parameters, Renew Energy, 151, 1102, 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.107 · DOI
  58. Zeng, 2015, Parametric study and process optimization for solar pyrolysis of beech wood, Energy Convers Manag, 106, 987, 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.10.039 · DOI
  59. Li, 2016, Product distribution from solar pyrolysis of agricultural and forestry biomass residues, Renew Energy, 89, 27, 10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.071 · DOI
  60. Zeng, 2017, Characterization of solar fuels obtained from beech wood solar pyrolysis, Fuel, 188, 285, 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.036 · DOI
  61. Zeng, 2015, The effect of temperature and heating rate on char properties obtained from solar pyrolysis of beech wood, Bioresour Technol, 182, 114, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.112 · DOI
  62. Ayala-Cortés, 2019, Exploring the influence of solar pyrolysis operation parameters on characteristics of carbon materials, J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 140, 290, 10.1016/j.jaap.2019.04.006 · DOI
  63. Wu, 2018, Solar-Thermal Pyrolysis of Mallee Wood at High Temperatures, Energy Fuels, 32, 4350, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03091 · DOI
  64. Andrade, 2018, Catalytic solar pyrolysis of microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Sol Energy, 173, 928, 10.1016/j.solener.2018.08.035 · DOI
  65. Andrade, 2020, A comparative study of the behavior of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Spirulina platensis in solar catalytic pyrolysis, Int J Energy Res, 44, 5397, 10.1002/er.5289 · DOI
  66. Hijazi, 2018, Solar pyrolysis of waste rubber tires using photoactive catalysts, Waste Manag, 77, 10, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.044 · DOI
  67. Zeng, 2021, Pyrolysis of carbonaceous feedstock driven by concentrated solar energy, Adv Chem Eng, 58, 131, 10.1016/bs.ache.2021.10.003 · DOI
  68. Mondal, 2021, Thermochemical pyrolysis of biomass using solar energy for efficient biofuel production: a review, Biofuels, 12, 125, 10.1080/17597269.2018.1461512 · DOI
  69. da Silveira, 2021, Solar assisted catalytic thermochemical processes: pyrolysis and hydropyrolysis of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii microalgae. Renew, Energy, 170, 669
  70. Alonso, 2015, Review of experimental investigation on directly irradiated particles solar reactors, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 41, 53, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.027 · DOI
  71. Kaczor, 2021, Application of inverse methodology to estimate unknown parameters of the mathematical model of biomass solar pyrolysis, Renew Energy, 163, 858, 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.018 · DOI
  72. Soria, 2017, Comprehensive CFD modelling of solar fast pyrolysis of beech wood pellets, Fuel Process Technol, 158, 226, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.01.006 · DOI
  73. Weimer, 2012, Solarthermal chemical processing challenges and commercial path forward, Curr Opin Chem Eng, 1, 211, 10.1016/j.coche.2012.04.003 · DOI
  74. Steinfeld, 2004, Solar Fuels and Materials. Encycl, Energy, 5, 623
  75. Eldredge, 2021, The feasibility of solar assisted pyrolysis of sewer sludge and its potential for CO2 emissions reductions, Energy, 226, 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120296 · DOI
  76. Sobek, 2019, Solar pyrolysis of waste biomass: Part 1 reactor design, Renew Energy, 143, 1939, 10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.011 · DOI
  77. Ibrahim, 2019, Supercritical water gasification of wastewater sludge for hydrogen production, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 44, 10328, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.184 · DOI
  78. Faraji, 2021, Hydrogen-rich syngas production via integrated configuration of pyrolysis and air gasification processes of various algal biomass: Process simulation and evaluation using Aspen Plus software, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, 18844, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.047 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Parthasarathy, 2021, Thermal degradation characteristics and gasification kinetics of camel manure using thermogravimetric analysis, J Environ Manage, 287, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112345 · DOI
  80. Al-Rumaihi, 2021, Thermal degradation characteristics and kinetic study of camel manure pyrolysis, J Environ Chem Eng, 9, 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106071 · DOI
  81. Wan Mahari, 2021, Valorization of municipal wastes using co-pyrolysis for green energy production, energy security, and environmental sustainability: A review, Chem Eng J, 421, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129749 · DOI
  82. Campuzano, 2016, Characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and methane production: A review, Waste Manag, 54, 3, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.016 · DOI
  83. Maxizoo., 2020, Live Animals Policy. FAOSTAT, Food Agric Organ United Nations
  84. Erdogdu, 2019, Pyrolysis of goat manure to produce bio-oil, Eng Sci Technol an Int J, 22, 452, 10.1016/j.jestch.2018.11.002 · DOI
  85. Yuan, 2017, Cattle manure pyrolysis process: Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis with isoconversional methods, Renew Energy, 107, 489, 10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.026 · DOI
  86. He, 2020, Pyrolysis study on cattle manure: From conventional analytical method to online study of pyrolysis photoionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 151, 10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104916 · DOI
  87. Zhou, 2020, A strategy of using recycled char as a co-catalyst in cyclic in-situ catalytic cattle manure pyrolysis for increasing gas production, Waste Manag, 107, 74, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.002 · DOI
  88. Touray, 2014, Thermochemical and pore properties of goat-manure-derived biochars prepared from different pyrolysis temperatures, J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 109, 116, 10.1016/j.jaap.2014.07.004 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Zeng, 2018, Speciation and bioavailability of heavy metals in pyrolytic biochar of swine and goat manures, J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 132, 82, 10.1016/j.jaap.2018.03.012 · DOI
  90. Tu D, Dong H, Wid BS. Pyrolysis behavior of selected manures using TG-FTTR techniques. Livest. Environ. VIII - Proc. 8th Int. Symp., Iguassu Falls, Brazil: 2008, p. 215–22. 10.13031/2013.25501. · DOI
  91. Fernandez-Lopez, 2015, Life cycle assessment of swine and dairy manure: Pyrolysis and combustion processes, Bioresour Technol, 182, 184, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.140 · DOI
  92. Jeong, 2015, Production of biocrude-oil from swine manure by fast pyrolysis and analysis of its characteristics, Renew Energy, 79, 14, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.041 · DOI
  93. Katsaros, 2019, Gasification of poultry litter in a lab-scale bubbling fluidised bed reactor: Impact of process parameters on gasifier performance and special focus on tar evolution, Waste Manag, 100, 336, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.09.014 · DOI
  94. Whitely, 2006, Multi-utilization of chicken litter as a biomass source, Part II. Pyrolysis. Energy and Fuels, 20, 2666
  95. Atienza-Martínez, 2020, Pyrolysis of dairy cattle manure: evolution of char characteristics, J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 145, 10.1016/j.jaap.2019.104724 · DOI
  96. Stylianou, 2020, Physicochemical and structural characterization of biochar derived from the pyrolysis of biosolids, cattle manure and spent coffee grounds, J Energy Inst, 93, 2063, 10.1016/j.joei.2020.05.002 · DOI
  97. Tavasoli, 2018, Influence of the blend nickel/porous hydrothermal carbon and cattle manure hydrochar catalyst on the hydrothermal gasification of cattle manure for H2 production, Energy Convers Manag, 173, 15, 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.061 · DOI
  98. Dodor, 2018, Co-application of biochar and cattle manure counteract positive priming of carbon mineralization in a sandy soil, Environ Syst Res, 7, 5, 10.1186/s40068-018-0108-y · DOI
  99. Wang, 2021, Enrichment of antibiotic resistance genes after sheep manure aerobic heap composting, Bioresour Technol, 323, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124620 · DOI
  100. Li, 2020, Co-digestion of cow and sheep manure: Performance evaluation and relative microbial activity, Renew Energy, 153, 553, 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.041 · DOI
  101. Awasthi, 2020, Effect of biochar on emission, maturity and bacterial dynamics during sheep manure compositing, Renew Energy, 152, 421, 10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.065 · DOI
  102. Abubaker, 2020, Response of winter wheat to the application rate of raw and digested sheep manure alone and supplemented with urea in Libyan desert soil, Sci African, 8
  103. Elouear, 2016, Application of sheep manure and potassium fertilizer to contaminated soil and its effect on zinc, cadmium and lead accumulation by alfalfa plants, Sustain Environ Res, 26, 131, 10.1016/j.serj.2016.04.004 · DOI
  104. Olowoboko, 2018, Comparative Evaluation of Animal Manures and Their Ashes on Soil pH and Electrical Conductivity in some Southwestern Nigerian Soils, Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 49, 1442, 10.1080/00103624.2018.1464184 · DOI
  105. Meng, 2017, Contrasting effects of composting and pyrolysis on bioavailability and speciation of Cu and Zn in pig manure, Chemosphere, 180, 93, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.009 · DOI
  106. Meng, 2018, Chemical speciation and risk assessment of Cu and Zn in biochars derived from co-pyrolysis of pig manure with rice straw, Chemosphere, 200, 344, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.138 · DOI
  107. Wang, 2020, Effects of pyrolysis temperature and reaction time on the performance of swine-manure-derived bio-binder, Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 89, 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102608 · DOI
  108. Wu, 2020, Thermochemical liquefaction of pig manure: Factors influencing on oil, Fuel, 264, 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116884 · DOI
  109. Duan, 2020, Succession of keratin-degrading bacteria and associated health risks during pig manure composting, J Clean Prod, 258, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120624 · DOI
  110. Sanchez-Hernandez, 2021, Earthworms increase the potential for enzymatic bio-activation of biochars made from co-pyrolyzing animal manures and plastic wastes, J Hazard Mater, 408, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124405 · DOI
  111. Dias, 2010, Use of biochar as bulking agent for the composting of poultry manure: Effect on organic matter degradation and humification, Bioresour Technol, 101, 1239, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.024 · DOI
  112. Kimani, 2020, Co-application of poultry-litter biochar with Azolla has synergistic effects on CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddy soils, Heliyon, 6, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05042 · DOI
  113. Zolfi-Bavariani, 2016, Influence of poultry manure–derived biochars on nutrients bioavailability and chemical properties of a calcareous soil, Arch Agron Soil Sci, 62, 1578, 10.1080/03650340.2016.1151976 · DOI
  114. Orlando, 2020, Pretreatment of animal manure biomass to improve biogas production: A review, Energies, 13, 3573, 10.3390/en13143573 · DOI
  115. Elkhalifa S, Elhassan O, Parthasarathy P, Mackey H, Al-Ansari T, McKay G. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Individual Food Waste Items and their Blends for Biochar Production. vol. 48. 2020. 10.1016/B978-0-12-823377-1.50258-5. · DOI
  116. Parthasarathy, 2019, Performance study of a solar chimney air heater, Case Stud Therm Eng, 14, 10.1016/j.csite.2019.100437 · DOI
  117. Rahman, 2018, Anaerobic digestion of food waste, Green Energy Technol, 105, 10.1007/978-981-10-8129-3_7 · DOI
  118. AlNouss, 2021, Pyrolysis Study of Different Fruit Wastes Using an Aspen Plus Model, Front Sustain Food Syst, 5, 10.3389/fsufs.2021.604001 · DOI
  119. Elkhalifa, 2019, Food waste to biochars through pyrolysis : A review, Resour Conserv Recycl, 144, 310, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.024 · DOI
  120. Abdelaal, 2019, Food waste from a university campus in the Middle East: Drivers, composition, and resource recovery potential, Waste Manag, 98, 14, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.007 · DOI
  121. Pradhan, 2020, Biochar from vegetable wastes: agro-environmental characterization, Biochar, 2, 439, 10.1007/s42773-020-00069-9 · DOI
  122. Elkhalifa S, Elhassan O, Parthasarathy P, Mackey H, Al-Ansari T, McKay G. Thermogravimetric Analysis of Individual Food Waste Items and their Blends for Biochar Production. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng., vol. 48, Elsevier B.V.; 2020, p. 1543–8. 10.1016/B978-0-12-823377-1.50258-5. · DOI
  123. Nishimura, 2016, Efficient production of ethanol from waste paper and the biochemical methane potential of stillage eluted from ethanol fermentation, Waste Manag, 48, 644, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.11.051 · DOI
  124. Zhou, 2021, Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic wastes in a continuous microwave assisted pyrolysis system for fuel production, Chem Eng J, 418, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129412 · DOI
  125. Behera, 2020, Reduction of oxides obtained from waste Ni-MH battery’s positive electrode using waste plastics to produce nickel based alloy, J Clean Prod, 249, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119407 · DOI
  126. Vaccani, 2017, International Market Developments in the Sewage Sludge Treatment Industry, A Vaccani Partn AG, 1
  127. Irmak Aslan, 2017, Pyrolysis reaction models of waste tires: Application of Master-Plots method for energy conversion via devolatilization, Waste Manag, 68, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.006 · DOI
  128. Cheng, 2018, Liquefaction of ground tire rubber at low temperature, Waste Manag, 71, 301, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.004 · DOI
  129. Xu, 2020, Effects of operating parameters on products yield and volatiles composition during fast pyrolysis of food waste in the presence of hydrogen, Fuel Process Technol, 210, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106558 · DOI
  130. Kadlimatti, 2019, Bio-oil from microwave assisted pyrolysis of food waste-optimization using response surface methodology, Biomass Bioenergy, 123, 25, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.014 · DOI
  131. Opatokun, 2015, Product based evaluation of pyrolysis of food waste and its digestate, Energy, 92, 349, 10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.098 · DOI
  132. Fekhar, 2020, Thermo-catalytic co-pyrolysis of waste plastic and paper in batch and tubular reactors for in-situ product improvement, J Environ Manage, 269, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110741 · DOI
  133. Arenales, 2015, Thermal degradation of paper industry wastes from a recovered paper mill using TGA, Characterization and gasification test. WASTE Manag
  134. Avelar, 2016, Evaluation of briquettes made from textile industry solid waste, Renew Energy, 91, 417, 10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.075 · DOI
  135. Rago, 2018, Torrefaction of textile waste for production of energy-dense biochar using mass loss as a synthetic indicator, J Environ Chem Eng, 6, 811, 10.1016/j.jece.2017.12.055 · DOI
  136. Lin, 2016, A Mechanism Study on Hydrothermal Carbonization of Waste Textile, Energy Fuels, 30, 7746, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01365 · DOI
  137. Lee, 2016, Production of useful energy from solid waste materials by steam gasification, Int J Energy Res, 40, 1474, 10.1002/er.3529 · DOI
  138. Ma, 2017, Supercritical water pyrolysis of sewage sludge, Waste Manag, 59, 371, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.053 · DOI
  139. Urych, 2021, Sewage sludge and phytomass co-pyrolysis and the gasification of its chars: A kinetics and reaction mechanism study, Fuel, 285, 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119186 · DOI
  140. Wu, 2006, Hydrogen-rich synthesis gas production from waste wood via gasification and reforming technology for fuel cell application, J Mater Cycles Waste Manag, 8, 70, 10.1007/s10163-005-0138-1 · DOI
  141. Kim, 2014, Influence of reaction conditions on bio-oil production from pyrolysis of construction waste wood, Renew Energy, 65, 41, 10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.009 · DOI
  142. Grottola, 2018, Torrefaction of Woody Waste for Use as Biofuel, Energy Fuels, 32, 10266, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01136 · DOI
  143. Onay, 2015, Determination of synergetic effect in co-pyrolysis of lignite and waste tyre, Fuel, 150, 169, 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.041 · DOI
  144. Osayi, 2018, Evaluation of pyrolytic oil from used tires and natural rubber (Hevea brasiliensis), Chem Eng Commun, 205, 805, 10.1080/00986445.2017.1422493 · DOI
  145. Maroufi, 2017, Nano-carbons from waste tyre rubber: An insight into structure and morphology, Waste Manag, 69, 110, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.020 · DOI
  146. Moorthy Rajendran, 2020, Review of catalyst materials in achieving the liquid hydrocarbon fuels from municipal mixed plastic waste (MMPW), Mater Today Commun, 24
  147. Yang, 2015, Cogasification of typical plastics and rice straw with carbon dioxide, Environ Prog Sustain Energy, 34, 789, 10.1002/ep.12041 · DOI
  148. Lu, 2018, Synergistic effects on char and oil produced by the co-pyrolysis of pine wood, polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride, Fuel, 230, 359, 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.072 · DOI · Paper page
  149. Wang, 2019, Synergistic effect of biomass and polyurethane waste co-pyrolysis on soot formation at high temperatures, J Environ Manage, 239, 306, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.073 · DOI
  150. Acomb, 2013, Thermal processing of plastics from waste electrical and electronic equipment for hydrogen production, J Anal Appl Pyrolysis, 103, 320, 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.09.014 · DOI
  151. Xie, 2019, Solar pyrolysis of cotton stalk in molten salt for bio-fuel production, Energy, 179, 1124, 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.055 · DOI
  152. Parthasarathy, 2021, Effect of heating rate on the pyrolysis of camel manure, Biomass Convers Biorefinery, 2021, 1
  153. Aller, 2016, Biochar properties: Transport, fate, and impact, Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol, 46, 1183, 10.1080/10643389.2016.1212368 · DOI
  154. Huang, 2020, Engineered biochar derived from food waste digestate for activation of peroxymonosulfate to remove organic pollutants, Waste Manag, 107, 211, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.009 · DOI
  155. Zeng, 2020, Characterization of char generated from solar pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated biomass, Energy, 206, 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118128 · DOI · Paper page
  156. Zeng, 2019, Solar pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated biomass for gas fuel production, Energy, 187, 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116016 · DOI
  157. Gupta, 2018, Application of biochar from food and wood waste as green admixture for cement mortar, Sci Total Environ, 619–620, 419, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.044 · DOI
  158. Abdallah, 2020, Evaluation of biochars derived from food waste for synthesis gas production via pyrolysis and CO2 gasification, Biomass Bioenergy, 143, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105883 · DOI
  159. Amin, 2016, Biochar applications and modern techniques for characterization, Clean Technol Environ Policy, 18, 1457, 10.1007/s10098-016-1218-8 · DOI
  160. Beims, 2019, Technology readiness level assessment of pyrolysis of trygliceride biomass to fuels and chemicals, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 112, 521, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.017 · DOI
  161. Sorunmu, 2020, A review of thermochemical upgrading of pyrolysis bio-oil: Techno-economic analysis, life cycle assessment, and technology readiness, GCB Bioenergy, 12, 4, 10.1111/gcbb.12658 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 69

Metadata

Authors
Parthasarathy, P., Al-Ansari, T., Mackey, H. R., Sheeba Narayanan, K., & McKay, G.
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
316
Pages
123378
ISSN
0016-2361
DOI
10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123378
Cited by
69
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Qatar Foundation
  • Qatar National Research Fund (NPRP-11S-0117-180328)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review