The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental investigation of CO2–brine–rock interactions at elevated temperature and pressure: Implications for CO2 sequestration in deep-saline aquifers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geochemical aspects of CO2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers: A review
De Silva, G. P. D., Ranjith, P. G., & Perera, M. S. A. (2015) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.045 · Cited by 408
Comprehensive Review of Caprock-Sealing Mechanisms for Geologic Carbon Sequestration
Song, J., & Zhang, D. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es301610p · Cited by 388
Spycher, N., & Pruess, K. (2010) · Transport in Porous Media · doi:10.1007/s11242-009-9425-y · Cited by 315
Olivine dissolution and carbonation under conditions relevant for in situ carbon storage
Johnson, N. C., Thomas, B., Maher, K., Rosenbauer, R. J., Bird, D., & Brown, G. E. (2014) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.02.026 · Cited by 148
Self-citationWu, Y., & Li, P. (2020) · Geothermal Energy · doi:10.1186/s40517-020-00173-w · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenbauer, R. J., Koksalan, T., & Palandri, J. L.
- Venue
- Fuel Processing Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 14-15
- Pages
- 1581-1597
- ISSN
- 0378-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135183586
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental investigation of CO2–brine–rock interactions at elevated temperature and pressure: Implications for CO2 sequestration in deep-saline aquifers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.01.011
- The paper
- Rosenbauer, R. J., Koksalan, T., & Palandri, J. L. (2005). Experimental investigation of CO2–brine–rock interactions at elevated temperature and pressure: Implications for CO2 sequestration in deep-saline aquifers. Fuel Processing Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.01.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
