Cited by 77Mobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

SenseChain: A blockchain-based crowdsensing framework for multiple requesters and multiple workers

Kadadha, Maha, Otrok, Hadi, Mizouni, Rabeb, Singh, Shakti, Ouali, Anis·2020·Future Generation Computer Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2019.12.007

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kadadha, M., Otrok, H., Mizouni, R., Singh, S., & Ouali, A.
Affiliations
  • Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
  • EBTIC (AE)
Corresponding author
Kadadha, Maha
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
105
Pages
650-664
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995069889
Cited by
77
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 4
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
  • United Arab Emirates University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
crowdsensing, blockchain, Ethereum, smart contracts, payment distribution, worker selection, privacy, Solidity, Web3.js

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review