Cited by 522Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

Crowdbc: a blockchain-based decentralized framework for crowdsourcing

Li, Ming, Weng, Jian, Yang, Anjia, Lu, Wei, Zhang, Yue, Hou, Lin, Liu, Jia-Nan, Xiang, Yang +1 more·2019·IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems

Abstract

Crowdsourcing systems which utilize the human intelligence to solve complex tasks have gained considerable interest and adoption in recent years. However, the majority of existing crowdsourcing systems rely on central servers, which are subject to the weaknesses of traditional trust-based model, such as single point of failure. They are also vulnerable to distributed denial of service (DDoS) and Sybil attacks due to malicious users involvement. In addition, high service fees from the crowdsourcing platform may hinder the development of crowdsourcing. How to address these potential issues has both research and substantial value. In this paper, we conceptualize a blockchain-based decentralized framework for crowdsourcing named CrowdBC, in which a requester's task can be solved by a crowd of workers without relying on any third trusted institution, users' privacy can be guaranteed and only low transaction fees are required. In particular, we introduce the architecture of our proposed framework, based on which we give a concrete scheme. We further implement a software prototype on Ethereum public test network with real-world dataset. Experiment results show the feasibility, usability, and scalability of our proposed crowdsourcing system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpds.2018.2881735

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blockchain, a revolutionary decentralized model, can be adapted not only to remove the limitations of the conventional crowdsourcing schemes but also to usher technological advancements including decentralization and transparency.

    “Blockchain, a revolutionary decentralized model, can be adapted not only to remove the limitations of the conventional crowdsourcing schemes but also to usher technological advancements including decentralization and transparency [193,195].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, M., Weng, J., Yang, A., Lu, W., Zhang, Y., Hou, L., Liu, J.-N., Xiang, Y., & Deng, R. H.
Affiliations
  • Jinan University (CN)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • Singapore Management University (SG)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Published
2019-06-01
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1251-1266
ISSN
  • 1045-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2183
  • 2161-9883
OpenAlex
W2724474800
Cited by
522
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 10
FWCI
100.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key R&D Plan of China (2017YFB0802203, 2018YFB1003701)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61825203, U1736203, 61702222, 61472165, 61732021, 61877029, 61872153, 61802145, U1636209)
  • National Joint Engineering Research Center of Network Security Detection and Protection Technology
  • Guangdong Provincial Special Funds for Applied Technology Research and Development and Transformation of Important Scientific and Technological Achieve (2016B010124009, 2017B010124002)
  • Guangdong Key Laboratory of Data Security and Privacy Preserving (2017B030301004)
  • Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Data Security and Privacy Preserving (201705030004)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M612842)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
crowdsourcing, blockchain, decentralization (distributed systems), Ethereum, Sybil attack, DDoS attacks, trust model, user privacy, transaction fees, scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review