The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classifying global catastrophic risks
Open accessAbstract
We present a novel classification framework for severe global catastrophic risk scenarios. Extending beyond existing work that identifies individual risk scenarios, we propose analysing global catastrophic risks along three dimensions: the critical systems affected, global spread mechanisms, and prevention and mitigation failures. The classification highlights areas of convergence between risk scenarios, which supports prioritisation of particular research and of policy interventions. It also points to potential knowledge gaps regarding catastrophic risks, and provides an interdisciplinary structure for mapping and tracking the multitude of factors that could contribute to global catastrophic risks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Second, a risk is composed of hazards, vulnerabilities, and exposure, not just individual threats (IPCC, 2012; Avin et al., 2018; Currie and Ó hÉigeartaigh, 2018; Liu et al., 2018).”
From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as Avin et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While there have been some alternative frameworks for classifying GCRs (Avin et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2018; Baum and Barrett, 2019), these have yet to be widely adopted.”
From A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk (2021) · cites this paper as Avin et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259855 · Cited by 12,527
Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. I., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03180-140232 · Cited by 7,187
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030
Nationen, V. (2018) · Human Rights Documents online · doi:10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9813-2015016 · Cited by 3,392
(2002) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 421
(2009) · Disaster Prevention and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/dpm.2009.07318cae.003 · Cited by 409
Catastrophe: Risk and Response
Posner, R. A. (2004) · Cited by 388
The need for environmental horizon scanning
Sutherland, W. J., & Woodroof, H. J. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.04.008 · Cited by 291
Self-citationStrategic foresight: how planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making
Cook, C. N., Inayatullah, S., Burgman, M. A., Sutherland, W. J., & Wintle, B. A. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.005 · Cited by 209
Self-citationAmanatidou, E., Butter, M., Carabias-Hütter, V., Totti Könnölä, A., Leis, M., Sarıtas, O., Schaper-Rinkel, P., & van Rij, V. (2012) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scs017 · Cited by 173
Sustainability: Map the evidence
McKinnon, M. C., Cheng, S. H., Garside, R., Masuda, Y. J., & Miller, D. C. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/528185a · Cited by 104
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The importance of achieving foundational Sustainable Development Goals in reducing global risk
Cernev, T., & Fenner, R. A. (2019) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.102492 · Cited by 217
The existential risk space of climate change
Huggel, C., Bouwer, L. M., Juhola, S. K., Mechler, R., Muccione, V., Orlove, B., & Wallimann-Helmer, I. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03430-y · Cited by 126
Assessing climate change’s contribution to global catastrophic risk
Beard, S., Holt, L., Tzachor, A., Kemp, L., Avin, S., Torres, P., & Belfield, H. (2021) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102673 · Cited by 98
Self-citationExistential Security: Towards a Security Framework for the Survival of Humanity
Sears, N. A. (2020) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12800 · Cited by 78
Defence in Depth Against Human Extinction: Prevention, Response, Resilience, and Why They All Matter
Cotton‐Barratt, O., Daniel, M., & Sandberg, A. (2020) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12786 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Avin, S., Wintle, B. C., Weitzdörfer, J., Ó hÉigeartaigh, S. S., Sutherland, W. J., & Rees, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Avin, Shahar
- Venue
- Futures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 20-26
- ISSN
- 0016-3287 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789287982
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 21.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Futures (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (cc-by)
- Funders
- Arcadia Fund
- Templeton World Charity Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Nuclear Issues and Defense
- Keywords
- global catastrophic risk, risk classification, critical systems, risk prioritization, policy interventions, knowledge gaps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
