The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity of the GAITRite® walkway system for the measurement of averaged and individual step parameters of gait
Open accessAbstract
This study compared individual step and averaged spatial and temporal gait parameters measured with an instrumented walkway system (GAITRite) with a three-dimensional motional analysis system (Vicon-512). Ten subjects aged 54-83 years (mean 66.5 years) who had undergone knee replacement surgery participated. Subjects walked across the GAITRite walkway at self-selected comfortable and fast speeds at the same time as the Vicon system recorded the motion of reflective markers attached to the subjects' shoes. Walking speed, cadence, step length and step time variables, averaged across one walk for both systems, showed an excellent level of agreement with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) between 0.92 and 0.99 and repeatability coefficients (RCs) between 1.0% and 5.9% of mean values. Step length and step time variables recorded for each footstep also showed good agreement between the systems at both comfortable and fast speeds (ICCs between 0.91 and 0.99; RCs between 2.6% and 7.8%). Frequency distributions showed that individual step values were within 1.5 cm and 0.02 s on the majority (80-94%) of occasions. These data indicate that the GAITRite system is a valid tool for measuring both averaged and individual step parameters of gait. It is also valid for use in older subjects following knee joint replacement surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cited by
Validity of the Optogait photoelectric system for the assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters
Lienhard, K., Schneider, D., & Maffiuletti, N. A. (2013) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.06.015 · Cited by 185
Choi, P., Ren, M., Phan, T. G., Callisaya, M., Ly, J. V., Beare, R., Chong, W., & Srikanth, V. (2012) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.647271 · Cited by 83
Esser, P., Dawes, H., Collett, J., Feltham, M. G., & Howells, K. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.005 · Cited by 67
Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Gait, Balance, and Functional Locomotor Mobility
Zipp, G. P., & Winning, S. (2012) · Pediatric Physical Therapy · doi:10.1097/pep.0b013e31823e0245 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, K. E., Wittwer, J. E., & Feller, J. A.
- Venue
- Gait & Posture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-321
- ISSN
- 0966-6362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037825856
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.