Cited by 152Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Equilibrium mass-dependent fractionation relationships for triple oxygen isotopes

Cao, Xiaobin, Liu, Yun·2011·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gca.2011.09.048

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, X., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Yun
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
75
Issue
23
Pages
7435-7445
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098488652
Cited by
152
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
triple oxygen isotopes, mass-dependent fractionation, kappa parameter, carbonates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review