Cited by 189Geological and Geochemical AnalysisCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

Geochemistry and petrology of listvenite in the Samail ophiolite, Sultanate of Oman: Complete carbonation of peridotite during ophiolite emplacement

Open access
Falk, Elisabeth S., Kelemen, Peter B.·2015·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gca.2015.03.014

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recently investigated listvenite from Wadi Mansah is characterized by magnesite as the dominant carbonate mineral consistent with peridotite alteration predominately driven by influx of CO2.

    “More recently investigated listvenite from Wadi Mansah is characterized by magnesite as the dominant carbonate mineral consistent with peridotite alteration predominately driven by influx of CO 2 (Falk & Kelemen, 2015).”
  • Full carbonation of peridotites is possible at natural conditions of about 100°C.

    “The presence of listvenites-fully carbonated peridotites composed entirely of magnesite and dolomite (MgCO 3 , CaMg(CO 3 ) 2 ) + quartz (SiO 2 ) + hematite and goethite (Fe 2 O 3 , FeO(OH)) + relict spinel and/or chromian mica-show that full carbonation of peridotites is possible at natural conditions (about 100 • C)”
  • Geologic examples demonstrate that complete, in situ carbon mineralization of peridotite is possible at elevated temperature and relatively high partial pressures of CO2.

    “Geologic examples demonstrate that complete, in situ carbon mineralization of peridotite is possible at elevated temperature and relatively high partial pressures of CO 2”
  • Including the raw data of Falk and Kelemen (2015) (n=6) in the calculation yields an acid fractionation correction of 0.070 ± 0.033‰ (n=12), within error of the average from the samples analyzed here.

    “Including the raw data of Falk and Kelemen (2015) ( n = 6) in the calculation of the acid-reaction yields a value of 0.070 ± 0.033 ‰ ( n =12), within error of the average from the samples analyzed here.”

    From Clumped-isotope thermometry of magnesium carbonates in ultramafic rocks (2016) · cites this paper as Falk and Kelemen, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falk, E. S., & Kelemen, P. B.
Affiliations
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US)
Corresponding author
Falk, Elisabeth S.
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
160
Pages
70-90
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069188138
Cited by
189
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (EAR-1049905)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-FE0002386, DGE-07-0742)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
listvenite, Samail ophiolite, ophiolite emplacement, mantle wedge, carbon storage, CO2-rich fluids, clumped isotope thermometry, Rb-Sr isochron, metasedimentary rocks, serpentinized peridotite

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review