Cited by 11Wildlife Ecology and ConservationWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Fine-scale habitat characteristics influence the winter habitat use of swamp deer (Rucervus duvaucelii) in Shuklaphanta National Park, Nepal

Open access
Dhami, Bijaya, Bhusal, Arjun, Neupane, Bijaya, Kc, Nishan, Lamichhane, Saurav, Bhattarai, Divya, Shrestha, Bikram·2023·Global Ecology and Conservation

Abstract

Endemic to India and Nepal, the swamp deer (Rucervus duvaucelii) is crucial for restoring and sustaining populations of top predators like tigers. Despite recent signs of species recovery in protected areas, the species remains vulnerable to extinction due to increasing anthropogenic activities. Information on factors influencing the occurrence of swamp deer is essential to formulate suitable management plans that can help to maintain their viable population and protect their habitats. We recorded swamp deer presence via direct sightings and indirect signs (pellets and footprints) through line transect surveys. Two ecological drivers i.e., habitat variables and disturbance variables that included eleven predictor variables were measured in the field where swamp deer was present (“used plots”) and absent (“habitat availability plot”). Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the factors associated with the probability of detecting the swamp deer. The model's outcomes showed that an increase in road/path/fireline distance and settlement distance, mixed forest habitat, and depth of leaf litter were positively correlated with the probability of locating swamp deer, while the other significant predictor variables (canopy cover, distance from water source, and presence of predator) had inverse relationships. In summary, our study has provided crucial insights into the factors influencing the presence of swamp deer in their habitat. These findings are useful for local governme…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02648

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhami, B., Bhusal, A., Neupane, B., Kc, N., Lamichhane, S., Bhattarai, D., & Shrestha, B.
Affiliations
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (CH)
  • Tribhuvan University (NP)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • WWF Nepal (NP)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
Corresponding author
Dhami, Bijaya
Venue
Global Ecology and Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
47
Pages
e02648
ISSN
2351-9894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386826069
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Ecology and Conservation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
swamp deer, winter habitat use, habitat selection, human disturbance, mixed forest habitat, leaf litter depth, canopy cover, distance to water source, predator presence, endangered species conservation, protected area management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review