Cited by 25RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Vertebrate codon bias indicates a highly GC-rich ancestral genome

Nabiyouni, Maryam, Prakash, Ashwin, Fedorov, Alexei·2013·Gene

Abstract

Two factors are thought to have contributed to the origin of codon usage bias in eukaryotes: 1) genome-wide mutational forces that shape overall GC-content and create context-dependent nucleotide bias, and 2) positive selection for codons that maximize efficient and accurate translation. Particularly in vertebrates, these two explanations contradict each other and cloud the origin of codon bias in the taxon. On the one hand, mutational forces fail to explain GC-richness (~60%) of third codon positions, given the GC-poor overall genomic composition among vertebrates (~40%). On the other hand, positive selection cannot easily explain strict regularities in codon preferences. Large-scale bioinformatic assessment, of nucleotide composition of coding and non-coding sequences in vertebrates and other taxa, suggests a simple possible resolution for this contradiction. Specifically, we propose that the last common vertebrate ancestor had a GC-rich genome (~65% GC). The data suggest that whole-genome mutational bias is the major driving force for generating codon bias. As the bias becomes prominent, it begins to affect translation and can result in positive selection for optimal codons. The positive selection can, in turn, significantly modulate codon preferences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gene.2013.01.033

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Optimizing GC content has a similar effect to codon optimization because GC content correlates with codon usage in vertebrates.

    “Optimizing GC content has a similar effect as it correlates with codon usage in vertebrates13.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nabiyouni, M., Prakash, A., & Fedorov, A.
Affiliations
University of Toledo (US)
Corresponding author
Fedorov, Alexei
Venue
Gene
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
519
Issue
1
Pages
113-119
ISSN
0378-1119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086214522
Cited by
25
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
codon usage bias, vertebrates, GC content, mutational bias, positive selection, last common ancestor, third codon position, translation efficiency, nucleotide composition, genome evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Composition, Chickens, Codon, Humans, Mutation, Nucleotides, Selection, Genetic, Vertebrates, Zebrafish, Gene Expression, Open Reading Frames, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review