Cited by 8Congenital limb and hand anomaliesGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic and rare skin diseases.

Novel compound heterozygous mutations of the DOCK6 gene in a familial case of Adams-Oliver syndrome 2

Wang, Zhaokun, Wang, Xin, Guiyu Lou, Litao Qin, Shasha Bian, Tang, Xia, Hongjie Zhu, Shengran Wang +2 more·2019·Gene

Abstract

Introduction Adams-Oliver syndrome (AOS) is a rare developmental disorder characterized by the combination of aplasia cutis congenita of the scalp vertex and terminal transverse limb defects. DOCK6 (Dedicator of cytokinesis 6) is one of the six identified AOS genes. Methods We performed targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a child with an AOS phenotype. Sanger DNA sequencing further validated her lineal consanguinity. To explore the pathological features of the mutation, a minigene assay was used to investigate the effects of the mutation on splicing. Results Two compound heterozygous DOCK6 mutations (c.4106+2T>C and c.3063 C>G (p.Y1021*)) were identified in this family, and both mutations have not been reported previously. Sanger DNA sequencing indicated that the mutations were inherited maternally and paternally, respectively. The results of the minigene assay showed that the c.4106+2T>C mutation resulted in aberrant splicing and caused a four-nucleotide insertion in the transcript and a premature stop codon. Conclusions Our findings expanded the number of reported cases of this rare disease and the mutation spectrum of DOCK6 mutations, which can serve as the basis for prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gene.2019.03.023

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Wang, X., Lou, G., Qin, L., Bian, S., Tang, X., Zhu, H., Wang, S., Hao, B., & Liao, S.
Affiliations
Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Bingtao Hao
  • Shixiu Liao
Venue
Gene
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
700
Pages
65-69
ISSN
0378-1119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2924866448
Cited by
8
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of China (81650010, 81450018)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Congenital limb and hand anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and rare skin diseases.
Keywords
DOCK6, compound heterozygosity, aplasia cutis congenita, limb malformations, aberrant splicing, novel mutations, consanguinity, mutation spectrum, prenatal diagnosis, genetic counseling
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Consanguinity, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Female, Genes, Recessive, Heterozygote, Humans, Male, Mutation, Pedigree, Phenotype, Scalp Dermatoses, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Limb Deformities, Congenital, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review