Cited by 72Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCardiac Health and Mental HealthHealth Education and Validation

Validity and reliability of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinic: the HADS in a cardiomyopathy population

Poole, Norman A., Morgan, John F.·2006·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study is the validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in patients suffering from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in an inner city teaching hospital. The secondary objective was to establish whether the use of the total HADS score to detect "caseness" is justified.Methods One hundred fifteen patients in a cardiac outpatient clinic completed the HADS, which was compared against the gold standard Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R nonpatient version (SCID-np). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for the anxiety and depression subscales, as well as the total score, then sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Retest correlation was assessed at 2 weeks in 31 patients.Results The depression subscale was highly sensitive (100%) when the cutoff score 8 was used; however, the corresponding specificity was poor (79%). Raising the cutoff to 10 improved specificity but compromised sensitivity. The anxiety subscale was performed similarly though with less accuracy. The total HADS score produced a poor ROC curve and performed best when the cutoff was 14.Conclusions The HADS performs well as a screening instrument for anxiety and depression in this population at the designed cutoff score 8. However, its use as a research instrument and the practice of using the total score to detect caseness are not supported by this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.08.004

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poole, N. A., & Morgan, J. F.
Affiliations
St George's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Poole, Norman A.
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
55-58
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147381854
Cited by
72
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, anxiety screening, depression screening, psychometric validation, cut-off values, sensitivity and specificity, test-retest reliability, cardiology outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review