The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women Underrepresented on Editorial Boards of 60 Major Medical Journals
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
Wennerås, C., & Wold, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387341a0 · Cited by 1,345
Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108 · Cited by 1,114
The “Gender Gap” in Authorship of Academic Medical Literature — A 35-Year Perspective
Jagsi, R., Guancial, E. A., Worobey, C. C., Henault, L. E., Chang, Y., Starr, R., Tarbell, N. J., & Hylek, E. M. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa053910 · Cited by 870
Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors
BUDDEN, A., TREGENZA, T., AARSSEN, L., KORICHEVA, J., LEIMU, R., & LORTIE, C. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008 · Cited by 552
Leadership: Why gender and culture matter.
Ayman, R., & Korabik, K. (2010) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0018806 · Cited by 525
Is There Still a Glass Ceiling for Women in Academic Surgery?
Zhuge, Y., Kaufman, J., Simeone, D. M., Chen, H., & Velazquez, O. C. (2011) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182111120 · Cited by 513
Women Physicians in Academic Medicine — New Insights from Cohort Studies
Nonnemaker, L. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002103420606 · Cited by 490
Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine. Glass ceiling or sticky floor?
Tesch, B. J. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.273.13.1022 · Cited by 431
Compensation and Advancement of Women in Academic Medicine: Is There Equity?
Ash, A. S., Carr, P. L., Goldstein, R., & Friedman, R. H. (2004) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-141-3-200408030-00009 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Filardo, G., da Graca, B., Sass, D. M., Pollock, B. D., Smith, E. B., & Martinez, M. A.-M. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i847 · Cited by 458
Silver, J. K., Poorman, J. A., Reilly, J. M., Spector, N. D., Goldstein, R., & Zafonte, R. D. (2018) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0802 · Cited by 121
Carapinha, R., Ortiz-Walters, R., McCracken, C. M., Hill, E. V., & Reede, J. Y. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001284 · Cited by 77
Perspectives on the Global Disparity in Ecological Science
Livingston, G., Waring, B., Pacheco, L. F., Buchori, D., Jiang, Y., Gilbert, L., & Jha, S. (2016) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biv175 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Amrein, K., Langmann, A., Fahrleitner-Pammer, A., Pieber, T. R., & Zollner-Schwetz, I.
- Venue
- Gender Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 378-387
- ISSN
- 1550-8579 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004667441
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 32
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women Underrepresented on Editorial Boards of 60 Major Medical Journals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.genm.2011.10.007
- The paper
- Amrein, K., Langmann, A., Fahrleitner-Pammer, A., Pieber, T. R., & Zollner-Schwetz, I. (2011). Women Underrepresented on Editorial Boards of 60 Major Medical Journals. Gender Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genm.2011.10.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
