Cited by 29scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open AccessPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Perspectives on the Global Disparity in Ecological Science

Open access
Livingston, George, Waring, Bonnie, Pacheco, Luis F., Buchori, Damayanti, Jiang, Yuexin, Gilbert, Lawrence, Jha, Shalene·2016·BioScience

Abstract

Currently, countries with the highest human development index (HDI) dominate the production of ecological research. This is problematic because ecology is a discipline that is highly relevant to the challenges facing countries with lower indices. We characterize the full state of current inequity at the authorship and editorial levels, investigating the relative role of gross domestic product (GDP) versus research investment in driving publication patterns. We find that the representation of low HDI countries decreases dramatically from authorship to editorial levels. GDP was the best predictor of publication rate for high HDI countries, whereas research investment was an equal or better predictor for low HDI countries. In light of our results, we propose an alternative model of knowledge sharing and production that emphasizes (a) increasing equity in the communication of ecological science at a global scale, (b) expanding ecology funding in low HDI countries, and (c) prioritizing ecological science in low HDI regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biosci/biv175

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Socio-economic variables such as the human development index significantly impact a country's scientific production and collaboration patterns.

    “Socio-economic variables (e.g., human development index (HDI)) has a significant impact on a country's scientific production and collaboration patterns [118,152,199].”

    From Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [152]

    The Results (page not provided) link GDP, research investment, and publication counts, with different relationships in high- and low-HDI countries. Qualitative inequities (page not provided) reports that high-HDI countries collaborate more with one another, but says collaboration patterns were not analyzed in this review. The paper supports an association between socioeconomic conditions and scientific output and describes an HDI-related collaboration pattern; it does not establish a significant causal impact on both. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livingston, G., Waring, B., Pacheco, L. F., Buchori, D., Jiang, Y., Gilbert, L., & Jha, S.
Affiliations
Universidad Mayor de San Andrés (BO)
Corresponding author
  • Livingston, George
  • Waring, Bonnie
  • Pacheco, Luis F.
  • Buchori, Damayanti
  • Jiang, Yuexin
  • Gilbert, Lawrence
  • Jha, Shalene
Venue
BioScience
Published
2016-01-13
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
147-155
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W2284965958
Cited by
29
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
Human Development Index, research authorship, gross domestic product, research investment, publication rates, knowledge sharing, research funding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review