CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 226Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionGeographic Information Systems StudiesHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb

Elwood, Sarah, Leszczynski, Agnieszka·2011·Geoforum
DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2009. EFF and ACLU Urge Court to Reject Warrantless GPS Tracking. Electronic Frontier Foundation. <http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/03-0>.
  2. Harris, 2006, The omniscent eye: satellite imagery, battleship awareness, and thestructures of the imperial gaze, Surveillance and Society, 4, 101
  3. Leszczynski, A., 2010. Situating Neogeograpy in Political Economy. Paper presented at the Association of American Geographers Annual Conference, Washington, DC, 14-18 April.
  4. Pickles, 1991, Geography, GIS, and the surveillant society, Papers and Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences, 14, 80
  5. Zafra, A., 2009. Google Street View in Japan Faces Various Complaints. Search Engine Journal. <http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-street-view-in-japan-faces-various-complaints/13048/>.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 226

Related

Metadata

Authors
Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Elwood, Sarah
ORCID
Venue
Geoforum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
6-15
ISSN
0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003
OpenAlex
W2028329245
Semantic Scholar
a1174c8fa05e17f237ee54e714eae7266ce3a5c5
Cited by
226
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
38.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Geoforum (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
privacy, geoweb, geospatial web, Web 2.0, Google Street View, geotagging, geographic information technology, privacy negotiation, data practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review