Cited by 1,388Law, Rights, and FreedomsDigitalization, Law, and RegulationPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

A Taxonomy of Privacy

Open access
Solove, Daniel J.·2006·University of Pennsylvania Law Review

Abstract

Privacy is a concept in disarray. Nobody can articulate what it means. As one commentator has observed, privacy suffers from an embarrassment of meanings. Privacy is far too vague a concept to guide adjudication and lawmaking, as abstract incantations of the importance of privacy do not fare well when pitted against more concretely-stated countervailing interests. In 1960, the famous torts scholar William Prosser attempted to make sense of the landscape of privacy law by identifying four different interests. But Prosser focused only on tort law, and the law of information privacy is significantly more vast and complex, extending to Fourth Amendment law, the constitutional right to information privacy, evidentiary privileges, dozens of federal privacy statutes, and hundreds of state statutes. Moreover, Prosser wrote over 40 years ago, and new technologies have given rise to a panoply of new privacy harms. A new taxonomy to understand privacy violations is thus sorely needed. This article develops a taxonomy to identify privacy problems in a comprehensive and concrete manner. It endeavors to guide the law toward a more coherent understanding of privacy and to serve as a framework for the future development of the field of privacy law.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/40041279

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 109 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    In some cases, courts have recognized a harm in public surveillance.

    “In some cases, however, courts have recognized a harm in public surveillance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    In Fourth Amendment law, courts frequently conclude that surveillance in private places implicates a reasonable expectation of privacy whereas surveillance in public places does not.

    “In Fourth Amendment law, courts frequently conclude that surveillance in private places implicates a reasonable expectation of privacy whereas surveillance in public places does not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    Tort law is generally consistent with this approach.

    “Tort law is generally consistent with this approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Historically, interrogation has been employed to impinge upon freedom of association and belief.

    “Historically, interrogation has been employed to impinge upon freedom of association and belief.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SCHRECKER, supra note 114

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    Combating identity theft after it happens has proven immensely difficult.

    “Combating identity theft after it happens has proven immensely difficult.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [200]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 193
  • May combine two claims. 93
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    The examples of activities typically referred to as privacy violations are clearly not the same.

    “These violations are clearly not the same.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Courts and policymakers frequently struggle in recognizing privacy interests, and when this occurs, cases are dismissed or laws are not passed.

    “Courts and policymakers frequently struggle in recognizing privacy interests, and when this occurs, cases are dismissed or laws are not passed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The Court has concluded that while the Fourth Amendment protects against surveillance in private places such as one's home, the Amendment has little applicability to surveillance in public places.

    “Therefore, the Court has concluded that while the Fourth Amendment protects against surveillance in private places such as one's home, the Amendment has little applicability to surveillance in public places.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The Fifth Amendment certainly does not protect the information itself; if the same facts can be produced at trial via other witnesses or evidence, they are not prohibited.

    “The Fifth Amendment certainly does not protect the information itself; if the same facts can be produced at trial via other witnesses or evidence, they are not prohibited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The Fifth Amendment's protection against interrogation is very limited.

    “The Fifth Amendment's protection against interrogation is very limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Plaintiffs bringing claims involving surveillance in public have generally not been successful.

    “In contrast, plaintiffs bringing claims involving surveillance in public have generally not been successful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Companies use Social Security numbers as passwords, and because SSNs can be readily obtained by identity thieves from public records or database companies, people's accounts and personal information are insecure.

    “Companies use Social Security numbers (SSNs) as passwords, and since SSNs can be readily obtained by identity thieves from public records or from database companies, people's accounts and personal information are insecure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [201]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    In 1902, in Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co., a flour company included a lithograph of Abigail Roberson, a minor, on 25,000 advertisement flyers without her consent.

    “In 1902, in Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co., a flour company included a lithograph of Abigail Roberson, a minor, on 25,000 advertisement flyers without her consent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    A number of privacy statutes ensure accuracy in record systems.

    “In addition to false light and defamation, a number of privacy statutes ensure accuracy in record systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    Privacy is too complicated a concept to be boiled down to a single essence.

    “Privacy is too complicated a concept to be boiled down to a single essence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    New technologies have given rise to a panoply of different privacy problems, and many of them do not readily fit into Prosser's four categories.

    “New technologies have given rise to a panoply of different privacy problems, and many of them do not readily fit into Prosser's four categories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Architectural problems are akin to environmental harms or pollution.

    “They are akin, in many ways, to environmental harms or pollution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Courts and policymakers frequently have a singular view of privacy in mind when they assess whether or not an activity violates privacy.

    “Courts and policymakers frequently have a singular view of privacy in mind when they assess whether or not an activity violates privacy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As a result, courts and policymakers either conflate distinct privacy problems despite significant differences or fail to recognize a problem entirely.

    “As a result, they either conflate distinct privacy problems despite significant differences or fail to recognize a problem entirely.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    Privacy is the relief from a range of kinds of social friction.

    “Privacy is the relief from a range of kinds of social friction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Privacy is best understood as a family resemblance concept.

    “Elsewhere, I have argued that privacy is best understood as a family resemblance concept.30”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wittgenstein, 1968

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Solove, Conceptualizing Privacy

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Privacy is a vague concept that appears to be about everything and therefore nothing.

    “Privacy seems to be about everything, and therefore it appears to be nothing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Various problems referred to as privacy violations bear substantial similarities to each other.

    “It is no accident that various problems are referred to as privacy violations; they bear substantial similarities to each other.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    As with visual surveillance, audio surveillance has long been viewed as troubling.

    “As with visual surveillance, audio surveillance has long been viewed as troubling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The law can serve as a source for determining what privacy violations society recognizes.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many discussions of privacy appeal to fears and anxieties, and commentators often fail to translate those instincts into a reasoned account of why privacy problems are harmful.

    “Many discussions of privacy appeal to people's fears and anxieties.9 What commentators often fail to do, however, is translate those instincts into a reasoned, well-articulated account of why privacy problems are harmful.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Whitman, 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Each of these groups consists of different related subgroups of harmful activities.

    “Each of these groups consists of different related subgroups of harmful activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    Privacy is not freedom from all forms of social friction; rather, it is protection from a cluster of related activities that impinge upon people in related ways.

    “Of course, privacy is not freedom from all forms of social friction; rather, it is protection from a cluster of related activities that impinge upon people in related ways.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Declaring that an activity is harmful or problematic does not automatically imply that there should be legal redress, since there may be valid reasons why the law should not get involved or why countervailing interests should prevail.

    “Of course, declaring that an activity is harmful or problematic does not automatically imply that there should be legal redress, since there may be valid reasons why the law should not get involved or why countervailing interests should prevail.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A new taxonomy to address privacy violations for contemporary times is sorely needed.

    “Therefore, a new taxonomy to address privacy violations for contemporary times is sorely needed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The law can serve as a source for determining what privacy violations society recognizes.
    • Rests on an assumption: The question of which matters and activities are private is too culturally variable and contextual to be the focus of the taxonomy.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Pervasive monitoring of every first move or false start will, at the margin, incline choices toward the bland and the mainstream.

    “pervasive monitoring of every first move or false start will, at the margin, incline choices toward the bland and the mainstream.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, supra note 28

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Despite the wide-ranging body of law addressing privacy issues today, commentators often lament the law's inability to adequately protect privacy.

    “Despite the wide-ranging body of law addressing privacy issues today, commentators often lament the law's inability to adequately protect privacy.18”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] 18. U.S.C. § 6802(c) (2000). 230

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The collection of information itself can constitute a harmful activity; not all information collection is harmful, but certain kinds of collection can be.

    “The collection of this information itself can constitute a harmful activity.Not all information collection is harmful, but certain kinds of collection can be.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Imbalances in power can be risk enhancing, in that they increase the risk of abuses of power.

    “Imbalances in power can also be risk enhancing, in that they increase the risk of abuses of power.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Architectural problems involve less the overt insult or reputational harm to a person and more the creation of the risk that a person might be harmed in the future.

    “They involve less the overt insult or reputational harm to a person and more the creation of the risk that a person might be harmed in the future.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The general progression from information collection to processing to dissemination is the data moving further away from the control of the individual.

    “The general progression from information collection to processing to dissemination is the data moving further away from the control of the individual.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    If a person consents to most of these activities, there is no privacy violation.

    “If a person consents to most of these activities, there is no privacy violation.28”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Information collection creates disruption based on the process of data gathering; even if no information is revealed publicly, information collection can create harm.

    “Information collection creates disruption based on the process of data gathering.Even if no information is revealed publicly, information collection can create harm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Two kinds of architectural issues emerge most often: enhancement of the risk that a harm will occur, and upsetting the balance of social or institutional power in undesirable ways.

    “In the taxonomy, two kinds of architectural issues emerge most often.First is the enhancement of the risk that a harm will occur.”
    • Also stated in: § 2006] · plain
      “Second, a particular activity can upset the balance of social or institutional power in undesirable ways.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Attempts to find such an essence often end up being too broad and vague, with little usefulness in addressing concrete issues.

    “Attempts to find such an essence often end up being too broad and vague, with little usefulness in addressing concrete issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Monitoring results in a subtle yet fundamental shift in the content of our character, a blunting and blurring of rough edges and sharp lines.

    “and it results in “a subtle yet fundamental shift in the content of our character, a blunting and blurring of rough edges and sharp lines.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, supra note 28

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    There are four basic groups of harmful activities: information collection, information processing, information dissemination, and invasion.

    “In the taxonomy that follows, there are four basic groups of harmful activities: (1) information collection, (2) information processing, (3) information dissemination, and (4) invasion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
    • Rests on an assumption: The question of which matters and activities are private is too culturally variable and contextual to be the focus of the taxonomy.
    • Rests on an assumption: The taxonomy can be useful for the law even though it limits its focus to activities that harm or cause problems for private matters or activities.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    These activities often are not inherently problematic or harmful.

    “These activities often are not inherently problematic or harmful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    For a long time, surveillance has been viewed as problematic.

    “For a long time, surveillance has been viewed as problematic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The law can serve as a source for determining what privacy violations society recognizes.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    The whole becomes greater than the parts.

    “The whole becomes greater than the parts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [147]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Like disclosure, interrogation often involves the divulging of concealed information.

    “Like disclosure, interrogation often involves the divulging of concealed information;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The law protects against interrogation, but it does so in a complicated and unsystematic way.

    “Although the law protects against interrogation, it does so in a complicated and unsystematic way.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Privacy law's theory of interrogation is not only incoherent, it is nearly nonexistent.

    “Privacy law's theory of interrogation is not only incoherent, it is nearly nonexistent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Fifth Amendment is therefore concerned only partly with the type of information involved; its applicability turns on compelled self-disclosure.

    “The Fifth Amendment is therefore concerned only partly with the type of information involved--its applicability turns on compelled self-disclosure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Surveillance is a sweeping form of investigatory power.

    “Surveillance is a sweeping form of investigatory power.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Well-concealed surveillance might eliminate the potential for any discomfort or chilling effect.

    “While such well-concealed surveillance might eliminate the potential for any discomfort or chilling effect, it would still enable the watchers to gather a substantial degree of information about people, creating an architectural problem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Compulsion can consist of the fear of not getting a job or of social opprobrium.

    “Compulsion can consist of the fear of not getting a job or of social opprobrium.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The process of combining data in the Information Age is much easier than before.

    “the process of combining it is much easier,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Surveillance threatens not only to chill the expression of eccentric individuality, but also, gradually, to dampen the force of our aspirations to it.

    “Surveillance thus “threatens not only to chill the expression of eccentric individuality, but also, gradually, to dampen the force of our aspirations to it.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cohen, supra note 28

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    For interrogation generally, the compulsion need not be direct; nor must it rise to the level of outright coercion.

    “However, for interrogation generally, the compulsion need not be direct; nor must it rise to the level of outright coercion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Surveillance inhibits freedom of choice, impinging upon self-determination.

    “Similarly, Paul Schwartz argues that surveillance inhibits freedom of choice, impinging upon selfdetermination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schwartz, supra note 18

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    People still feel some degree of compulsion because not answering might create the impression that they have something to hide.

    “One explanation may be that people still feel some degree of compulsion because not answering might create the impression that they have something to hide.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    As long as use immunity is granted, the government is free to compel even the most damning and private disclosures.

    “As long as use immunity is granted, the government is free to compel even the most damning and private disclosures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [130]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Combining information creates synergies.

    “This occurs because combining information creates synergies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Surveillance in public can certainly cause uneasiness.

    “Surveillance in public can certainly cause uneasiness, as illustrated by the example of being stared at continuously in public.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Surveillance extends beyond a search, for it records behavior, social interaction, and potentially everything that a person says and does.

    “It extends beyond a search, for it records behavior, social interaction, and potentially everything that a person says and does.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In cross-examination, a skilled attorney can carefully manipulate what a witness says and can intimidate a witness into coming across less favorably.

    “In cross-examination, a skilled attorney can carefully manipulate what a witness says and can intimidate a witness into coming across less favorably.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If watched long enough, a person might be caught in some form of illegal or immoral activity, and this information could then be used to discredit or blackmail her.

    “If watched long enough, a person might be caught in some form of illegal or immoral activity, and this information could then be used to discredit or blackmail her.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the information is not previously hidden, then no privacy interest is implicated by the collection or dissemination of the information.

    “If the information is not previously hidden, then no privacy interest is implicated by the collection or dissemination of the information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This understanding of privacy stems from what the author calls the secrecy paradigm.

    “This understanding of privacy stems from what I call the “secrecy paradigm.””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Combining data and analyzing it can be put to beneficial uses.

    “Combining data and analyzing it certainly can be put to beneficial uses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The data gathered about people in the Information Age is significantly more extensive than before.

    “the data gathered about people is significantly more extensive,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Interrogation resembles intrusion in its invasiveness, for interrogation is a probing, a form of searching.

    “Interrogation resembles intrusion in its invasiveness, for interrogation is a probing, a form of searching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Credit reporting allows creditors to assess people's financial reputations in a world where first-hand experience of the financial condition and trustworthiness of individuals is often lacking.

    “Credit reporting allows creditors to assess people's financial reputations in a world where first-hand experience of the financial condition and trustworthiness of individuals is often lacking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [148]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The computer technologies to analyze data in the Information Age are more sophisticated and powerful than before.

    “and the computer technologies to analyze it are more sophisticated and powerful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    It remains unclear what interests the Fifth Amendment protects.

    “It remains unclear what interests the Fifth Amendment protects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [135]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    To some degree, surveillance resembles interrogation, for both involve the involuntary gathering of information.

    “To some degree, surveillance resembles interrogation, for both involve the involuntary gathering of information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Aggregation is a way to acquire information about people.

    “Like surveillance, aggregation is a way to acquire information about people.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Douglas's view that the Fifth Amendment protects against infamy as well as prosecution has not been accepted in Fifth Amendment doctrine.

    “Nevertheless, Douglas's view has not been accepted in Fifth Amendment doctrine.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The interrogator possesses extraordinary control over what information is elicited, how it is interpreted, and the impressions created by its revelations.

    “The interrogator possesses extraordinary control over what information is elicited, how it is interpreted, and the impressions created by its revelations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Interrogation occurs with the conscious awareness of the subject; surveillance can be clandestine.

    “Interrogation, however, occurs with the conscious awareness of the subject; surveillance can be clandestine.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Aggregation reveals facts about data subjects in ways far beyond anything they expected when they gave out the data.

    “It reveals facts about data subjects in ways far beyond anything they expected when they gave out the data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: People expect certain limits on what is known about them and on what others will find out.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Identification resembles interrogation in some ways.

    “In some ways, identification resembles interrogation, as identification often involves the questioning of individuals to compel them to identify themselves.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Like those forms, identification reveals, distorts, and intrudes.

    “and, like those forms, it reveals, distorts, and intrudes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    This case illustrates how identification can inhibit people's ability to change and can prevent their selfdevelopment by tying them to a past from which they want to escape.

    “This case illustrates how identification can inhibit people's ability to change and can prevent their selfdevelopment by tying them to a past from which they want to escape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [180]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Requiring the disclosure of identifying information would chill free speech, violating the First Amendment.

    “Thus, requiring the disclosure of identifying information would chill free speech, violating the First Amendment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Legally, the cases have drawn a line, but conceptually, no justification has been offered for the limitation.

    “Legally, the cases have drawn a line, but conceptually, no justification has been offered for the limitation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Data compilations reveal facets of our lives, but the data is often reductive and disconnected from the original context in which it was gathered.

    “They reveal facets of our lives, but the data is often reductive and disconnected from the original context in which it was gathered.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Identification enables us to attempt to verify identity.

    “Identification enables us to attempt to verify identity--that the person accessing her records is indeed the owner of the account or the subject of the records.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Aggregation is a less direct form of data acquisition than surveillance, for it occurs through processing data already gathered from individuals.

    “However, aggregation is a less direct form of data acquisition than surveillance, for it occurs through processing data already gathered from individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These cases limited Reporters Committee to the FOIA context, but they did not supply a reason why recognizing a privacy interest in aggregated data is necessarily linked only to FOIA and does not apply to other areas of law.

    “These cases limited Reporters Committee to the FOIA context, but they did not supply a reason why recognizing a privacy interest in aggregated data is necessarily linked only to FOIA and does not apply to other areas of law.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisenone given

    Identification involves a particular form of true information (one's identity), which enables databases of information to be linked to people.

    “Identification involves a particular form of true information (one's identity), which enables databases of information to be linked to people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Anonymity provides people with the ability to criticize the companies they work for and to blow the whistle.

    “Anonymity provides people with the ability to criticize the companies they work for and to blow the whistle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [187]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the United States, passports were used to stifle dissent; since Communists during the McCarthy era were prohibited from using passports, they were restricted from traveling outside the country.

    “In the United States, passports were used to stifle dissent; since Communists during the McCarthy era were prohibited from using passports, they were restricted from traveling outside the country.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [184]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Aggregation can lead to architectural problems; it can increase the power that others have over individuals.

    “Aggregation can also lead to architectural problems; it can increase the power that others have over individuals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    I do not agree that identification is inherently demeaning to dignity.

    “Therefore, I do not agree that identification is inherently demeaning to dignity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Identification diverges because it is primarily a form of connecting data to people.

    “Identification diverges, however, because it is primarily a form of connecting data to people.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Anonymity can enhance the persuasiveness of one's ideas, for identification can shade reception of ideas with readers' biases and prejudices.

    “Anonymity can enhance the persuasiveness of one's ideas, for identification can shade reception of ideas with readers' biases and prejudices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Identification links the digital person directly to a person in realspace.

    “Identification goes a step further--it links the digital person directly to a person in realspace.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Identification is similar to aggregation as both involve the combination of different pieces of information, one being the identity of a person.

    “Identification is similar to aggregation as both involve the combination of different pieces of information, one being the identity of a person.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In order to access various accounts, people's identity must be verified, a step that can reduce fraud and enhance accountability.

    “In order to access various accounts, people's identity must be verified, a step that can reduce fraud and enhance accountability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because it connects people to data, identification attaches informational baggage to people.

    “Because it connects people to data, identification attaches informational baggage to people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This leads to distortion.

    “This leads to distortion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    A national identification card has been explicitly rejected in the United States.

    “Although proposed many times in the United States, a national identification card has been explicitly rejected.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Identification is an efficient tool for controlling people.

    “It is also an efficient tool for controlling people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The identification marker conveys certain information and often bears a particular stigma.

    “The identification marker conveys certain information and often bears a particular stigma.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The 1973 report Records, Computers, and the Rights of Citizens concluded that a standard universal identifier should not be established in the United States now or in the foreseeable future.

    “We take the position that a standard universal identifier (SUI) should not be established in the United States now or in the foreseeable future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [168]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Identification requirements such as this one can help prevent misinformation and enable people to better assess the ad.

    “Identification requirements such as this one can help prevent misinformation and enable people to better assess the ad.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    Identification is a means to link people to data, not necessarily an indication that people are the equivalent of their identifying characteristics.

    “But, identification is a means to link people to data, not necessarily an indication that people are the equivalent of their identifying characteristics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Nonexpressive means of identification, such as fingerprints, identify people without signaling anything to the public.

    “In contrast, nonexpressive means of identification, such as fingerprints, identify people without signaling anything to the public.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Identification often involves the questioning of individuals to compel them to identify themselves.

    “as identification often involves the questioning of individuals to compel them to identify themselves.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There is an increasing tendency for the Social Security number to be used as if it were an SUI.

    “However, there is an increasing tendency for the Social Security number to be used as if it were an SUI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [168]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Identification enables us to confirm the identity of a person and to discover the perpetrator of a crime from traces left behind.

    “Identification enables us not only to confirm the identity of a person, but also to discover the perpetrator of a crime from traces left behind, such as fingerprints and genetic material.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [170]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Identification facilitates the detection and monitoring of a person and enables surveillance data to be categorized according to the individuals to which it pertains.

    “it facilitates the detection and monitoring of a person and enables surveillance data to be categorized according to the individuals to which it pertains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Identification is related to disclosure in that both involve the revelation of true information.

    “Identification is related to disclosure in that both involve the revelation of true information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Identification has many benefits.

    “Identification has many benefits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [171]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This prevented the applicant from concealing the fact she was a transsexual and effectively assuming a female identity.

    “it prevented her from concealing the fact she was a transsexual and effectively assuming a female identity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [177]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Anonymity and pseudonymity protect people from bias based on their identities and enable people to vote, speak, and associate more freely by protecting them from the danger of reprisal.

    “Anonymity and pseudonymity protect people from bias based on their identities and enable people to vote, speak, and associate more freely by protecting them from the danger of reprisal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [186]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Data compilations are often both telling and incomplete.

    “Data compilations are often both telling and incomplete.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Under federal election law, television ads advocating the election or defeat of a candidate must identify the person or group placing the ad.

    “Under federal election law, television ads advocating the election or defeat of a candidate must identify the person or group placing the ad.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [172]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Although the law recognizes injuries when a breach in security results in overt harm to an individual, courts are reluctant to find harm simply from the insecure storage of information.

    “Although the law recognizes injuries when a breach in security results in overt harm to an individual, courts are reluctant to find harm simply from the insecure storage of information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [212]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Secondary use resembles breach of confidentiality in that there is a betrayal of the person's expectations when giving out information.

    “Secondary use resembles breach of confidentiality, in that there is a betrayal of the person's expectations when giving out information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: People have expectations about how the data they give out will be used.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    An inability to participate in the maintenance and use of one's information can lead to feelings of powerlessness and frustration.

    “An inability to participate in the maintenance and use of one's information can lead to feelings of powerlessness and frustration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The disclosure tort also protects relationships of trust, but disclosure must result in the release of embarrassing secrets or discrediting data before courts will consider it to be harmful.

    “The disclosure tort also protects relationships of trust, but disclosure must result in the release of embarrassing secrets or discrediting data before courts will consider it to be harmful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    While these statutes stop short of requiring informed consent, they do give people some ability to discover the information gathered about them.

    “While these statutes stop short of requiring informed consent, they do give people some ability to discover the information gathered about them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Stevens's dissent recognizes that the harm of identification is often not in the disclosure of the identifying marker itself, but in the ability to connect this marker to a stream of collected data.

    “Stevens's dissent recognizes that the harm of identification is often not in the disclosure of the identifying marker (the name, fingerprint, etc.) itself, but in the ability to connect this marker to a stream of collected data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [192]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    People might not give out data if they know about a potential secondary use, such as for telemarketing, spam, or other forms of intrusive advertising.

    “People might not give out data if they know about a potential secondary use, such as for telemarketing, spam, or other forms of intrusive advertising.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In a world where personal information is increasingly used to make important decisions about our lives, powerlessness in this arena can be significantly troublesome.

    “But in a world where personal information is increasingly used to make important decisions about our lives, powerlessness in this arena can be significantly troublesome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Personal information is increasingly used to make important decisions about our lives.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The harm of secondary use is a dignitary one, emerging from denying people control over the future use of their data, which can be used in ways that have significant effects on their lives.

    “The harm is a dignitary one, emerging from denying people control over the future use of their data, which can be used in ways that have significant effects on their lives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The potential for secondary use generates fear and uncertainty over how one's information will be used in the future, creating a sense of powerlessness and vulnerability.

    “The potential for secondary use generates fear and uncertainty over how one's information will be used in the future, creating a sense of powerlessness and vulnerability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Exclusion is a harm created by being shut out from participating in the use of one's personal data, by not being informed about how that data is used, and by not being able to do anything to affect how it is used.

    “Rather, it is a harm created by being shut out from participating in the use of one's personal data, by not being informed about how that data is used, and by not being able to do anything to affect how it is used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Identity theft occurs because creditors and credit-reporting agencies often lack both the means and the incentives to correctly identify the persons who seek credit from them or on whom they report.

    “As Lynn LoPucki observes, identity theft occurs because “creditors and credit-reporting agencies often lack both the means and the incentives to correctly identify the persons who seek credit from them or on whom they report.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [197]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Federal privacy statutes guard against exclusion by mandating transparency and granting individuals the right to access their information.

    “Federal privacy statutes guard against exclusion by mandating transparency and granting individuals the right to access their information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Exclusion is different from insecurity in that exclusion is not primarily a harm caused by lack of protection against data leakage or contamination.

    “Exclusion is different than insecurity in that exclusion is not primarily a harm caused by the lack of protection against data leakage or contamination.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Breach of confidentiality requires only a betrayal of trust, regardless of the nature of the data revealed.

    “Breach of confidentiality requires only a betrayal of trust, regardless of the nature of the data revealed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    When removed from the original context in which it was collected, data can more readily be misunderstood.

    “When removed from the original context in which it was collected, data can more readily be misunderstood.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Disclosure differs from insecurity because the harm caused by disclosure is the actual leakage of information, while insecurity is the injury of being placed in a weakened state and made more vulnerable to future harms.

    “What the court failed to recognize is that disclosure differs from insecurity because the harm caused by disclosure is the actual leakage of information; insecurity is the injury of being placed in a weakened state, of being made more vulnerable to a range of future harms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Tort law has at least recognized the concept of accountability, although courts have not recognized the maintenance of personal information about a person as giving rise to fiduciary obligations.

    “Therefore, tort law has at least recognized the concept of accountability, although courts have not recognized the maintenance of personal information about a person as giving rise to fiduciary obligations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Both disclosure and breach of confidentiality involve the revelation of secrets about a person, but breaches of confidentiality also violate the trust in a specific relationship.

    “Both involve the revelation of secrets about a person, but breaches of confidentiality also violate the trust in a specific relationship.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Tort law, by and large, has not recognized exclusion as a harm.

    “Tort law, by and large, has not recognized exclusion as a harm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The law of fiduciary duties creates special duties of accountability within certain relationships.

    “The law of fiduciary duties creates special duties of accountability within certain relationships.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Many privacy statutes require that information be kept secure.

    “Many privacy statutes require that information be kept secure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The harm from a breach of confidence is not simply that information has been disclosed, but that the victim has been betrayed.

    “The harm from a breach of confidence, then, is not simply that information has been disclosed, but that the victim has been betrayed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Exclusion creates an architectural problem.

    “Exclusion, however, creates an architectural problem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Exclusion reduces accountability on the part of government agencies and businesses that maintain records about individuals.

    “Exclusion reduces accountability on the part of government agencies and businesses that maintain records about individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    When information is released publicly, it can be used in a host of unforeseeable ways, creating problems related to secondary use.

    “Moreover, when information is released publicly, it can be used in a host of unforeseeable ways, creating problems related to those caused by secondary use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Even if employers are correct that a prospective employee with a genetic risk is riskier to hire, such a rational discriminatory employment decision has costs.

    “Even if employers are correct that a prospective employee with a genetic risk for developing a certain condition is, on balance, riskier to hire than a prospective employee without such a predisposition, even such a rational discriminatory employment decision has its costs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The law often protects against disclosure when the information is kept secret but not when others know about it.

    “The law often protects against disclosure when the information is kept secret but not when others know about it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Many other courts have agreed that banks have a duty of confidentiality.

    “Many other courts have agreed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [276]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Exposure involves exposing to others certain physical and emotional attributes about a person.

    “Exposure involves the exposing to others of certain physical and emotional attributes about a person.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The attributes involved in exposure are viewed as deeply primordial, and their exposure often creates embarrassment and humiliation.

    “These are attributes that people view as deeply primordial, and their exposure often creates embarrassment and humiliation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The third party doctrine provides that if information is possessed or known by third parties, then, for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, an individual lacks a reasonable expectation of privacy in the information.

    “This doctrine provides that if information is possessed or known by third parties, then, for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, an individual lacks a reasonable expectation of privacy in the information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [268]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    In certain activities, we are vulnerable and weak, such as when we are nude or going to the bathroom.

    “Further, in certain activities, we are vulnerable and weak, such as when we are nude or going to the bathroom.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Knowing bits and pieces of gossip about a person often does not paint a more complete portrait and can lead to misimpressions and condemnation without full understanding.

    “Knowing bits and pieces of gossip about a person will often not paint a more complete portrait; it can lead to misimpressions and condemnation without full understanding.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    If a fact about a person is known to others, many courts conclude that it is no longer private.

    “Moreover, if a fact about a person is known to others, many courts conclude that it is no longer private.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The harm in disclosure is damage to reputation caused by dissemination, whereas the harm in breach of confidentiality is violation of trust in the relationship.

    “Disclosure differs from breach of confidentiality because the harm in disclosure involves the damage to reputation caused by the dissemination; the harm with breach of confidentiality is the violation of trust in the relationship.289”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [289]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dignity is a part of being civilized; it involves the ability to transcend one's animal nature.

    “Dignity is a part of being civilized; it involves the ability to transcend one's animal nature.323”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [323]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Disclosure involves spreading information beyond existing networks of information flow.

    “Lior Strahilevitz aptly observes that disclosure involves spreading information beyond existing networks of information flow.311”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [311]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Various states have restricted the disclosure of particular forms of information, such as medical data and alcohol and drug abuse.

    “Various states have restricted the disclosure of particular forms of information, such as medical data and alcohol and drug abuse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [286]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Society may want to inhibit certain rational judgments, such as employment decisions based on genetic information.

    “Likewise, society may want to inhibit certain rational judgments, such as employment decisions based on genetic information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Disclosure controls through imposition of social sanctions and condemnation, whereas exposure works by stripping people of their dignity.

    “Disclosure is a power that controls through the imposition of social sanctions and condemnation.Exposure works in a different way, by stripping people of their dignity.327”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [327]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    We have been socialized into concealing these activities.

    “We have been socialized into concealing these activities.319”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [319]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Exposure rarely reveals significant new information that can be used in the assessment of a person's character or personality.

    “cant new information that can be used in the assessment of a person's character or personality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Disclosure protections guard against irrational judgment based on stereotypes or misinformation about diseases.

    “tional judgment based on stereotypes of misinformation about diseases.300”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [300]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    People want to protect information that makes them vulnerable or that can be used by others to harm them physically, emotionally, financially, and reputationally.

    “People want to protect information that makes them vulnerable or that can be used by others to harm them physically, emotionally, financially, and reputationally.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Even though most people would not view a victim of exposure as a lesser person or less civilized, victims feel that way.

    “Even though most people would not view a victim of exposure as a lesser person or as being less civilized, victims feel that way.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Genetic-based employment decisions may penalize people for things they cannot control and deter people from learning their genetic makeup.

    “Such decisions may penalize people for things they cannot control and deter people from learning their genetic makeup.301”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [301]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    A few courts have come to different conclusions regarding whether there is a privacy interest in information communicated to others.

    “A few courts, however, have come to different conclusions regarding whether there is a privacy interest in information communicated to others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Grief, suffering, trauma, injury, nudity, sex, urination, and defecation all involve primal aspects of our lives that are physical, instinctual, and necessary.

    “Grief, suffering, trauma, injury, nudity, sex, urination, and defecation all involve primal aspects of our lives-ones that are physical, instinctual, and necessary.318”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [318]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Disclosure can destroy anonymity, which is sometimes critical for the promotion of free expression.

    “Disclosure can inhibit people from associating with others, impinging upon freedom of association, and can also destroy anonymity, which is sometimes critical for the promotion of free expression.296”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [296]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Protecting against disclosure limits freedom of speech, but disclosure can inhibit the very interests free speech protects.

    “Although protecting against disclosure does limit freedom of speech, disclosure can inhibit the very interests free speech protects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In the Information Age, much of what we do is recorded by third parties.

    “In the Information Age, much of what we do is recorded by third parties.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In the Information Age, much of what we do is recorded by third parties.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Disclosure protections further democratic self-governance.

    “Second, as with free speech, disclosure protections further democratic self-governance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Disclosure of information about a person can distort our assessments rather than enhance our ability to judge her.

    “In many instances, disclosure of information about a person will not enhance our ability to judge her; in fact, it can distort our assessments.299”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [299]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Although this branch of the right to privacy has not received much further elaboration by the Court, it is recognized in many circuits, where it can enable plaintiffs to sue government officials for disclosing personal information.

    “Although this branch of the right to privacy has not received much further elaboration by the Court, it is recognized in many circuits, where it can enable plaintiffs to sue government officials for disclosing personal information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [279]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    We protect against the exposure of bodily aspects because this protection safeguards human dignity as defined by modern society.

    “We protect against the exposure of these bodily aspects because this protection safeguards human dignity as defined by modern society.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    The harm of disclosure is not so much the elimination of secrecy as the spreading of information beyond expected boundaries.

    “The harm of disclosure is not so much the elimination of secrecy as it is the spreading of information beyond expected boundaries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Solitude does not detract from a rich public life, but in fact enhances it.

    “In other words, solitude does not detract from a rich public life, but in fact enhances it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Companies are gathering data from public records to use for commercial and marketing purposes or to create dossiers on individuals for profiling and other analysis.

    “For example, companies are gathering data from public records to use for commercial and marketing purposes or to create dossiers on individuals for profiling and other analysis.342”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [342]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The harm caused by intrusion differs from that caused by other types of disruption because intrusion interrupts one's activities through the unwanted presence or activities of another person.

    “The harm caused by intrusion, however, differs from that caused by other types of disruption because intrusion interrupts one's activities through the unwanted presence or activities of another person.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Distortion not only affects the aggrieved individual; it also affects the society that judges that individual: it interferes with our relationships to that individual, and it inhibits our ability to assess the character of those that we deal with.

    “Distortion not only affects the aggrieved individual; it also affects the society that judges that individual: it interferes with our relationships to that individual, and it inhibits our ability to assess the character of those that we deal with.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Both distortion and disclosure can result in embarrassment, humiliation, stigma, and reputational harm.

    “Both distortion and disclosure can result in embarrassment, humiliation, stigma, and reputational harm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Blackmail does not seem to be about preventing disclosure, for prohibiting a blackmailer compensation for silence will likely make disclosure more probable.

    “Blackmail does not seem to be about preventing disclosure, for as Joseph Izenberg argues, prohibiting a blackmailer compensation for silence will likely make disclosure more probable.359”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [359]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    When people willingly transgress norms, society has a strong interest in shaming them, and it is socially beneficial for these norms to be internalized and result in feelings of shame.

    “When people willingly transgress these norms, society has a strong interest in shaming them, and it is socially beneficial for these norms to be internalized and to result in feelings of shame.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Once information is released into the public domain, it is no longer private.

    “Accordingly, once information is released into the public domain, it is no longer private.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The interest safeguarded by protections against appropriation is control of the way one presents oneself to society.

    “The interest safeguarded by protections against appropriation is control of the way one presents oneself to society.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Intrusion disturbs the victim's daily activities, alters her routines, destroys her solitude, and often makes her feel uncomfortable and uneasy.

    “It disturbs the victim's daily activities, alters her routines, destroys her solitude, and often makes her feel uncomfortable and uneasy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Intrusion need not involve spatial incursions: spam, junk mail, junk faxes, and telemarketing are disruptive in a similar way, as they sap people's time and attention and interrupt their activities.

    “Intrusion need not involve spatial incursions: spam, junk mail, junk faxes, and telemarketing are disruptive in a similar way, as they sap people's time and attention and interrupt their activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Distortion differs from disclosure because with distortion, the information revealed is false and misleading.

    “Distortion differs from disclosure, however, because with distortion, the information revealed is false and misleading.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Distortion's direct impact is felt by the aggrieved individual, but it has effects for all of society.

    “Distortion's direct impact is felt by the aggrieved individual, but it has effects for all of society.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Distortion is included in the taxonomy of privacy because of its significant similarity to other privacy disruptions.

    “I include distortion in the taxonomy of privacy because of its significant similarity to other privacy disruptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A space apart from others has enabled people to develop artistic, political, and religious ideas that have had lasting influence and value when later introduced into the public sphere.

    “Moreover, a space apart from others has enabled people to develop artistic, political, and religious ideas that have had lasting influence and value when later introduced into the public sphere.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Distortion, like disclosure, involves the spreading of information that affects the way society views a person.

    “Distortion, like disclosure, involves the spreading of information that affects the way society views a person.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Intrusion into one's private sphere can be caused not only by physical incursion and proximity but also by gazes (surveillance) or questioning (interrogation).

    “Intrusion into one's private sphere can be caused not only by physical incursion and proximity but also by gazes (surveillance) or questioning (interrogation).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Solitude enables people to rest from the pressures of living in public and performing public roles.

    “Solitude enables people to rest from the pressures of living in public and performing public roles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Invasion harms differ from the harms of information collection, networking, and dissemination because they do not always involve information.

    “Invasion harms differ from the harms of information collection, networking, and dissemination because they do not always involve information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The protection of a realm of solitude does not merely benefit the individual; it is built into society's structure for a social purpose.

    “The protection of a realm of solitude does not merely benefit the individual; it is built into society's structure for a social purpose.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Blackmail differs from disclosure, exposure, and breach of confidentiality in that it involves a threat of disclosure rather than an actual disclosure.

    “Blackmail differs from disclosure, exposure, and breach of confidentiality in that it involves a threat of disclosure rather than an actual disclosure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    For the harm of increased accessibility, prior publicity is not dispositive; one must focus on the extent to which the information is made more accessible.

    “For the harm of increased accessibility, however, prior publicity is not dispositive.One must focus on the extent to which the information is made more accessible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Intrusion often interferes with solitude, the state of being alone or able to retreat from the presence of others.

    “In particular, intrusion often interferes with solitude, the state of being alone or able to retreat from the presence of others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tort law does not recognize a separate cause of action for exposure; the tort of public disclosure covers both disclosure and exposure.

    “Tort law does not recognize a separate cause of action for exposure; the tort of public disclosure covers both disclosure and exposure.328”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [328]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The tort of appropriation was one of the first privacy torts to be recognized after Warren and Brandeis's article.

    “The tort of appropriation was thus one of the first privacy torts to be recognized after Warren and Brandeis's article.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Increased accessibility to personal information has many benefits, including enhancing openness and enabling people to locate information more easily.

    “Increased accessibility to personal information has many benefits.It enhances openness, allowing people to locate information that they are seeking more easily.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The tort of appropriation has currently lost its way, as courts and commentators have not been able to adequately explain the injury that is redressed by the tort.

    “The tort of appropriation has currently lost its way, as courts and commentators have not been able to adequately explain the injury that is redressed by the tort.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The crime of blackmail prevents the use of disclosure, exposure, or breach of confidentiality as a means for exercising power over another person.

    “The crime of blackmail thus prevents the use of disclosure, exposure, or breach of confidentiality as a means for exercising power over another person.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Intrusion is related to disclosure, as disclosure is often made possible by intrusive information gathering activities.

    “Intrusion is related to disclosure, as disclosure is often made possible by intrusive information gathering activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Many administrative bodies charged with examining the issue have hesitated because of the increased accessibility the Internet will bring.

    “But many administrative bodies charged with examining the issue have hesitated because of the increased accessibility the Internet will bring.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Exposure involves people unwillingly placed in transgression of norms; victims are not viewed as blameworthy, and there is little social value in their suffering.

    “However, exposure involves people unwillingly placed in transgression of these norms.We do not view the victims as blameworthy, and there is little social value in their suffering.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Increased accessibility does not involve a direct disclosure; secret information is not disclosed; rather, information already available to the public is made easier to access.

    “Increased accessibility does not involve a direct disclosure.Secret information is not disclosed.Rather, information that is already available to the public is made easier to access.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In McNamara, the harm is more appropriately classified as exposure, and had the court conceptualized it as exposure, the public place would have been much less relevant.

    “The harm in this case, however, is more appropriately classified as one of exposure.Had the court conceptualized the disruption as one of exposure, the fact that it occurred in a public place would have been much less relevant to the analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Placing court records online has given rise to an extensive debate over privacy.

    “Nevertheless, placing them online has given rise to an extensive debate over privacy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Blackmail involves coercing an individual by threatening to expose her personal secrets if she does not accede to the demands of the blackmailer, which often involve paying hush money.

    “Blackmail involves coercing an individual by threatening to expose her personal secrets if she does not accede to the demands of the blackmailer, which often involve paying hush money.358”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [358]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Criminal codes classify blackmail as a form of extortion, which involves the use of fear or threats to force someone to submit to another's will.

    “Indeed, criminal codes classify blackmail as a form of extortion, which involves the use of fear or threats to force someone to submit to another's will.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites CAL.PENAL CODE § 518

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The threat of disclosure is so profoundly disempowering that society still wants to protect against it.

    “But the threat of disclosure is so profoundly disempowering that society still wants to protect against it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The purpose of restricting blackmail is not to limit disclosure but to prevent the use of the threat of disclosure as a tool for exerting power and dominion over others.

    “The purpose of restricting blackmail is not to limit disclosure but to prevent the use of the threat of disclosure as a tool for exerting power and dominion over others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    One's reputation is the product of the judgment of other people in society.

    “Although it is true that people work very hard to build their reputations, one's reputation is the product of the judgment of other people in society.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Courts generally find no privacy interest if information is in the public domain, if people are monitored in public, if information is gathered in a public place, if no intimate or embarrassing details are revealed, or if no new data is collected about a person.

    “courts generally find no privacy interest if information is in the public domain, if people are monitored in public, if information is gathered in a public place, if no intimate or embarrassing details are revealed, or if no new data is collected about a person.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Court extended the reasoning in Griswold to the use of contraceptives by unmarried persons as well.

    “In Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Court extended the reasoning in Griswold to the use of contraceptives by unmarried persons as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [444]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Decisional interference and exposure have been judicially recognized to affect the same aspects of the self-health, the body, sex, and so on.

    “Decisional interference and exposure have been judicially recognized to affect the same aspects of the self-health, the body, sex, and so on.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Decisional interference does not apply to all decisions, but only to a subset of decisions; this aspect resembles exposure in its focus on those aspects of life which are socially considered to be the most private.

    “Decisional interference, therefore, does not apply to all decisions, but only to a subset of decisions; this aspect of decisional interference resembles exposure in its focus on those aspects of life which are socially considered to be the most private.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Privacy problems are caused not by technology alone, but primarily through activities of people, businesses, and the government.

    “Privacy problems, however, are caused not by technology alone, but primarily through activities of people, businesses, and the government.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Modern privacy problems emerge not just from disclosing deep secrets, but from making obscure information more accessible (increased accessibility) or from consistent observation or eavesdropping (surveillance).

    “Modern privacy problems emerge not just from disclosing deep secrets, but from making obscure information more accessible (increased accessibility) or from consistent observation or eavesdropping (surveillance).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Appropriation is understood primarily as a harm to property interests, and its dignitary dimensions are thus frequently ignored by courts.

    “Appropriation is understood primarily as a harm to property interests, and its dignitary dimensions are thus frequently ignored by courts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Lawrence Court noted that laws restricting consensual private sexual behavior often give rise to blackmail.

    “The Lawrence Court noted that in 1955, when crafting the Model Penal Code, the American Law Institute recommended against criminalizing”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [476]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [477]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In intrusion analyses, courts often fail to recognize harm when people are intruded upon in public places, yet the nature of the harm is not limited solely to private places.

    “In intrusion analyses, courts often fail to recognize harm when people are intruded upon in public places, yet the nature of the harm is not limited solely to private places.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Decisional interference resembles insecurity, secondary use, and exclusion, in that all three of these information-processing harms can have a chilling effect on a person's decisions regarding her health and body.

    “Decisional interference also resembles insecurity, secondary use, and exclusion, in that all three of these information-processing harms can have a chilling effect on a person's decisions regarding her health and body.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Although all of the privacy harms identified in the taxonomy are related in some way, they are not all related in the same way; there is no common denominator that links them all.

    “Although all of the privacy harms I identify in the taxonomy are related in some way, they are not all related in the same way-there is no common denominator that links them all.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Decisional interference bears a similarity to the harm of intrusion as both involve invasions into realms where we believe people should be free from the incursions of others.

    “Decisional interference bears a similarity to the harm of intrusion as both involve invasions into realms where we believe people should be free from the incursions of others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Due to conceptual confusion, courts and legislatures often fail to recognize privacy problems, and thus no balancing ever takes place.

    “Unfortunately, due to conceptual confusion, courts and legislatures often fail to recognize privacy problems, and thus no balancing ever takes place.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Often, technology is involved in various privacy problems, as it facilitates the gathering, processing, and dissemination of information.

    “Often, technology is involved in various privacy problems, as it facilitates the gathering, processing, and dissemination of information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Stanley v. Georgia, the Court concluded that the Constitution protects the right to receive information and ideas regardless of their social worth.

    “the Court concluded that”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [463]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The concept of seclusion is relative; the mere fact that a person can be seen by someone does not automatically mean that he or she can legally be forced to be subject to being seen by everyone.

    “The mere fact that a person can be seen by someone does not automatically mean that he or she can legally be forced to be subject to being seen by everyone.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [440]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Decisional interference also bears an indirect resemblance to blackmail, in that laws restricting consensual private sexual behavior often give rise to blackmail.

    “Decisional interference also bears an indirect resemblance to blackmail, in that laws restricting consensual private sexual behavior often give rise to blackmail.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The taxonomy demonstrates that privacy disruptions are different from one another and yet share important similarities.

    “The taxonomy demonstrates that privacy disruptions are different from one another and yet share important similarities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Whalen v. Roe, the Court explained that the constitutionally protected zone of privacy extends not only to the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions but also to the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.

    “the Court explained in Whalen v. Roe that the constitutionally protected”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [451]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Courts and legislatures respond well to more traditional privacy problems, such as intrusions that are physical in nature, disclosures of deep secrets, or distortion.

    “Courts and legislatures respond well to more traditional privacy problems, such as intrusions that are physical in nature, disclosures of deep secrets, or distortion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The essence of the identification problem is being linked to a stream of data, not only a name.

    “the essence of the problem is being linked to a stream of data, not only a name.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some of the privacy problems we face today are different in nature and do not track traditional conceptions of privacy.

    “some of the privacy problems we face today are different in nature, and do not track traditional conceptions of privacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With the taxonomy, the paper demonstrates that privacy-affecting activities are not without cost and have certain nontrivial effects on people's lives and well-being.

    “With the taxonomy, I have attempted to demonstrate that these activities are not without cost, that they have certain nontrivial effects on people's lives and well-being.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The constitutional right to information privacy, although not developed further by the Supreme Court, has been recognized by most federal circuit courts.

    “This gave rise to the constitutional right to information privacy, which, although not developed further by the Supreme Court, has been recognized by most federal circuit courts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [452]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Privacy violations are a group of related harms, each of which has received at least some recognition in the law.

    “Privacy violations are a group of related harms, each of which has received at least some recognition in the law.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Tort law readily recognizes and redresses breach of confidentiality, yet Fourth Amendment law ignores it as a harm.

    “tort law readily recognizes and redresses breach of confidentiality, yet Fourth Amendment law ignores it as a harm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Griswold v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution prohibited the government from banning the use of contraceptives by married couples.

    “In 1965, in Griswold v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution prohibited the government from banning the use of contraceptives by married couples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [441]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    When analyzing surveillance issues, courts focus on whether the surveillance occurs in public or in private, even though problems and harms can emerge in all settings.

    “when analyzing surveillance issues, courts focus on whether the surveillance occurs in public or in private, even though problems and harms can emerge in all settings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The taxonomy lays down a framework to understand the range of privacy problems, the similarities and differences among them, the relationships among them, and what it is that makes them problematic.

    “The taxonomy lays down a framework to understand the range of privacy problems, the similarities and differences among them, the relationships among them, and what it is that makes them problematic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Insecurity remains a problem even where there has been no actual disclosure or leakage of embarrassing details.

    “insecurity remains a problem, even where there has been no actual disclosure or leakage of embarrassing details.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
235 of 235
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.

    “about which I believe meaningful generalizations can be made.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The law can serve as a source for determining what privacy violations society recognizes.

    “I will frequently use the law as a source for determining what privacy violations society recognizes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The question of which matters and activities are private is too culturally variable and contextual to be the focus of the taxonomy.

    “Since the question of which matters and activities are private is too culturally variable and contextual, this taxonomy focuses on potentially harmful or problematic activities”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The taxonomy can be useful for the law even though it limits its focus to activities that harm or cause problems for private matters or activities.

    “Despite the fact that the taxonomy limits its focus to the activities that harm or cause problems for private matters or activities, I believe that the taxonomy serves as a useful way for the law to approach and comprehend privacy problems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social control can be beneficial and every society must exercise a sizeable degree of social control.

    “since social control can be beneficial and every society must exercise a sizeable degree of social control.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    People expect certain limits on what is known about them and on what others will find out.

    “People expect certain limits on what is known about them and on what others will find out.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    People give out bits of information in different settings, only revealing a small part of themselves in each context.

    “People give out bits of information in different settings, only revealing a small part of themselves in each context.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    People selectively spread around small pieces of data throughout most of their daily activities, and they have the expectation that in each disclosure, they are revealing relatively little about themselves.

    “Indeed, people selectively spread around small pieces of data throughout most of their daily activities, and they have the expectation that in each disclosure, they are revealing relatively little about themselves.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    People have expectations about how the data they give out will be used.

    “Secondary uses thwart people's expectations about how the data they give out will be used.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    People often do not read or understand privacy policies.

    “But even with privacy policies stating that information might be used in secondary ways, people often do not read or understand these policies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the Information Age, much of what we do is recorded by third parties.

    “In the Information Age, much of what we do is recorded by third parties.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Personal information is increasingly used to make important decisions about our lives.

    “But in a world where personal information is increasingly used to make important decisions about our lives, powerlessness in this arena can be significantly troublesome.”
12 of 12

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decisional interference compromises individuals' autonomy to make decisions and take responsibility for those decisions.

    “Decisional interference compromises individuals' autonomy to make decisions and take responsibility for those decisions.”

    From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Solove, 2006

    The Decisional Interference section describes unwanted government intrusion into decisions about personal life, and the Additional information passage links such interference to a harm to autonomy and liberty (page not provided). The copy does not say that it compromises individuals’ ability to take responsibility for their decisions; it also limits the concept to certain private decisions, not decisions generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The result of both distortion and disclosure is embarrassment, stigma, and reputational harm.

    “The result of both distortion and disclosure is embarrassment, stigma, and reputational harm.”

    From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Solove, 2006

    In “7. Distortion,” Solove says both distortion and disclosure can result in embarrassment, stigma, and reputational harm. The citing sentence presents those harms as the result rather than possible results, making the claim more definite than the source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Solove (2006) warns that we need to consider the scope and implications of coercion when nudging individuals to share information.

    “There is, however, the warning issued by Solove (2006) (Table 1) that we need to consider the scope and implications of coercion when nudging individuals to share information.”

    From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Solove, 2006

  • These forms of privacy can be threatened and breached through practices normally understood as unacceptable, each producing a different form of harm.

    “As Solove [37] details, these forms of privacy can be threatened and breached through a number of what are normally understood as unacceptable practices, each of which produces a different form of harm (table 1).”

    From The ethics of smart cities and urban science (2016) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Stanley is cited under two different reporter volumes

    Minor

    The paper cites the same Stanley decision at page 564 of both volume 394 and volume 395 of U.S. Reports. At least one reporter volume is wrong.

  • Two different acts are assigned the same public-law number

    Minor

    The paper assigns Pub. L. No. 90-351 to both the Federal Communications Act of 1934 and the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. Those distinct acts cannot both have that public-law number.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

24 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [1]1. L. REV. 1609, 1611 (1999) ("At present, however, no successful standards, legal or otherwise, exist for limiting the collection and utilization of personal data in cyberspace."). 181 SOLOVE, THE DIGITAL PERSON, supra note 40, at 1. 182 Clarke, Information Systems, supra note 169, at 20. 183
  2. [2]2. As Richard Sobel observes, "[i]dentity systems and documents have a long history of uses and abuses for social control and discrimination." Richard Sobel, The Degradation of Political Identity Under a National Identification System, 8 B.U. J. SCI. & TECH. L. 37, 48 (2002). Indeed, one of the primary reasons that governments created passports and identity cards was to restrict movement, alter patterns of migration, and control the movements of poor people and others viewed as undesirable. Marc Garcelon, Colonizing the Subject: The Gene- alogy and Legacy of the Soviet Internal Passport, in DOCUMENTING INDIVIDUAL IDENTITY 83, 86 (Jane Caplan & John Torpey eds., 2001). 184 Sobel, supra note 183, at 49. 185 Anonymous speech has a long history as an important mode of expression. Between 1789 and 1809, numerous Presidents and Congressmen published anonymous political writ- ings. SMITH, supra note 111, at 41. Ben Franklin used over forty pen names during his life. Id. at 43. Indeed, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay published the Federalist Papers using the pseudonym "Publius." McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n, 514 U.S. 334, 343 n.6 (1995). The Anti-Federalists also used pseudonyms. Id. 186 As Gary Marx notes, anonymity can "facilitate the flow of information and commu- nication on public issues" and "encourage experimentation and risk taking without facing large consequences, risk of failure, or embarrassment since one's identity is protected." Gary 206
  3. [9]9. U.S.C. § 1030 (2000 & Supp. 2002). 212 See Daniel J. Solove, The New Vulnerability: Data Security and Personal Informa- tion, in SECURING PRIVACY IN THE INTERNET AGE 11-12 (Margaret Jane Radin et al. eds., forthcoming 2006), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=583483 (arguing that the law fails to adequately guard sensitive information, and that a reconceptualization of the legal duties in- formation-keepers owe their customers is necessary). 213 See, e.g., Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. § 2707(c) (2000) (setting a minimum $1000 fine per violation); Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988,
  4. [11]11. See Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614, 616 (2004) (construing
  5. [12]12. U.S.C. § 552a(g)(4) (2000)). 214 536 U.S. 822, 826 (2002). 215 Id. at 827, 838. 224
  6. [22]22. U.S.C. § § 3401-3421 (2000)). 262 Id. at 438. 263 Id. at 438-39. 264 Id. at 442. 265 Id. at 443. 266 Id. at 442. 267 442 U.S. 735, 743 (1979). 268 SOLOVE, THE DIGITAL PERSON, supra note 40, at 201. 269 See id. at 202-09 (discussing the consequences of applying outdated privacy protec- tion schemes to modern times). 270 Id. at 201-02. 369
  7. [23]23. N.E. 442, 442 (N.Y. 1902). 370 Id. 371 Id. Roberson became so ill that she had to see a physician. Id. 372 Id. at 442-43. 373 Id. at 447-48 (applying Warren & Brandeis, supra note 21). 374 Editorial, The Right of Privacy, N.Y. TIMES, Aug. 23, 1902, at 8, reprinted in Denis O'Brien, The Right of Privacy, 2 COLUM. L. REV. 437, 438 (1902). 375 Comment, An Actionable Right to Privacy?: Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co., 12 YALE L.J. 35, 36 (1902). 376 O'Brien, supra note 374, at 437. 377 See, e.g., Irwin R. Kramer, The Birth of Privacy Law: A Century Since Warren and Brandeis, 39 CATH. U. L. REV. 703, 717 (1990) (noting that the statutes "made it both a tort and a misdemeanor . . . to use another's name, portrait, or picture for commercial purposes without the subject's consent"). 378
  8. [26]26. HARV. L. REV. 1892, 1894 (1981) (dating the first mention to a report written in 1499); see also Semayne's Case, 77 Eng. Rep. 194, 195 (
  9. [34]34. U.S. 113, 153 (1973).
  10. [40]40. Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119, 1132 (5th Cir. 1978) ("There is another strand to the right to privacy properly called the right to confidentiality."). 457 Id. at 252. 458 Id. at 251; Warren & Brandeis, supra note 21, at 195. 459 Union Pacific, 141 U.S. at 251. 460 394 U.S. 557 (1969). 461 410 U.S. 113, 152 (1973). 462 405 U.S. 438, 453 (1972). 463 Stanley, 394 U.S. at 564. 464 Id. 465 Id. 466 277
  11. [41]41. U.S. 438 (1928). 467 Stanley, 395 U.S. at 564 (quoting Olmstead, 277 U.S. at 478 (Brandeis, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted)). 468 See Warren & Brandeis, supra note 21, at 195. the Court's reasoning suggests, necessitates governmental intrusion into one's home. The Court noted that people have "the right to be free from state inquiry into the contents of [their] library." 469 Linking decisional inter- ference with intrusion, it stressed that "a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch." 470 Further capturing the relationship between the two catego- ries, Robert Post contends that the intrusion tort protects "territories of the self," which are critical to remaining "an independent and autonomous per- son." 471 In Lawrence v. Texas, the Court further demonstrated the frequent over- lap between decisional interference and intrusion in striking down a law that prohibited consensual homosexual sodomy. 472 The Court reasoned that "adults may choose to enter upon this relationship in the confines of their homes and their own private lives and still retain their dignity as free per- sons." 473 The statute was unconstitutional because of "its [unjustified] in- trusion into the personal and private life of the individual." 474 Moreover, the Court stated: Liberty protects the person from unwarranted government intrusions into a dwelling or other private places. In our tradition the State is not omnipresent in the home. And there are other spheres of our lives and existence, outside the home, where the State should not be a dominant presence. Freedom ex- tends beyond spatial bounds. 475 The Court thus linked decisional interference to intrusion. Decisional interference also bears an indirect resemblance to blackmail, in that laws restricting consensual private sexual behavior often give rise to blackmail. The Lawrence Court noted that in 1955, when crafting the Model Penal Code, the American Law Institute recommended against criminalizing "consensual sexual relations conducted in private" 476 in part because "the statutes regulated private conduct not harmful to others," and because "the laws were arbitrarily enforced and thus invited the danger of blackmail." 477 Indeed, as Angus McLaren recounts, blackmail historically 469 Stanley, 395 U.S. at 565. 470 Id. 471 Post, supra note 44, at 973. 472 539 U.S. 558, 578 (2003). 473 Id. at 567. 474 Id. at 578. 475 Id. at 562. 476 Id. at 572 (quoting MODEL PENAL CODE § 213.2 cmt. 2 (1980)) 477 Id. (citing MODEL PENAL CODE § 207.5 cmt. at 277-78 (Tentative Draft No. 4, 1955)). For an interesting discussion of Lawrence and public versus private places, see Lior

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solove, D. J.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Solove, Daniel J.
Venue
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
154
Issue
3
Pages
477
ISSN
0041-9907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1526916602
Cited by
1,388
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 59
FWCI
74.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • University of Pennsylvania Law Review (publishedVersion)
  • eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Penn Carey Law Legal Scholarship Repository (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Funders
George Washington University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
privacy, privacy law, data privacy, Fourth Amendment, evidentiary privilege, privacy harms, privacy torts, constitutional right to privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review