A Taxonomy of Privacy
Open accessAbstract
Privacy is a concept in disarray. Nobody can articulate what it means. As one commentator has observed, privacy suffers from an embarrassment of meanings. Privacy is far too vague a concept to guide adjudication and lawmaking, as abstract incantations of the importance of privacy do not fare well when pitted against more concretely-stated countervailing interests. In 1960, the famous torts scholar William Prosser attempted to make sense of the landscape of privacy law by identifying four different interests. But Prosser focused only on tort law, and the law of information privacy is significantly more vast and complex, extending to Fourth Amendment law, the constitutional right to information privacy, evidentiary privileges, dozens of federal privacy statutes, and hundreds of state statutes. Moreover, Prosser wrote over 40 years ago, and new technologies have given rise to a panoply of new privacy harms. A new taxonomy to understand privacy violations is thus sorely needed. This article develops a taxonomy to identify privacy problems in a comprehensive and concrete manner. It endeavors to guide the law toward a more coherent understanding of privacy and to serve as a framework for the future development of the field of privacy law.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 109 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
In some cases, courts have recognized a harm in public surveillance.
“In some cases, however, courts have recognized a harm in public surveillance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In Fourth Amendment law, courts frequently conclude that surveillance in private places implicates a reasonable expectation of privacy whereas surveillance in public places does not.
“In Fourth Amendment law, courts frequently conclude that surveillance in private places implicates a reasonable expectation of privacy whereas surveillance in public places does not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Tort law is generally consistent with this approach.
“Tort law is generally consistent with this approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Historically, interrogation has been employed to impinge upon freedom of association and belief.
“Historically, interrogation has been employed to impinge upon freedom of association and belief.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SCHRECKER, supra note 114
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Combating identity theft after it happens has proven immensely difficult.
“Combating identity theft after it happens has proven immensely difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [200]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The Roberson court refused to recognize a remedy based on Warren and Brandeis's article, concluding that such an action was the proper domain of the legislature.
“The court refused to recognize a remedy based on Warren and Brandeis's article, concluding that such an action was the proper domain of the legislature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Generally, courts recognize intrusion upon seclusion tort actions only when a person is at home or in a secluded place.
“Generally, courts recognize intrusion upon seclusion tort actions only when a person is at home or in a secluded place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 652B cmt.c (1977)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
A year after the Roberson decision, New York passed a law creating a cause of action to redress the type of injury Roberson suffered.
“A year later, New York passed a law creating a cause of action to redress the type of injury Roberson suffered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Some courts are beginning to recognize realms of exclusion where people can shut others out, even in public.
“Some courts are beginning to recognize realms of exclusion where people can shut others out, even in public.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shulman v. Group W Prods., Inc., 955 P.2d 469, 491 (Cal.1998)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Surveillance can lead to self-censorship and inhibition.
“Surveillance can lead to self-censorship and inhibition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kang, supra note 19
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Swire, supra note 18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The result is that privacy is not balanced against countervailing interests.
“The result is that privacy is not balanced against countervailing interests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Without consent, most of these activities would constitute a privacy violation.
“Without consent, however, it most often would.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Direct awareness of surveillance can cause a person to alter her behavior.
“Not only can direct awareness of surveillance make a person feel extremely uncomfortable, but it can also cause that person to alter her behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Surveillance is a tool of social control.
“Because of its inhibitory effects, surveillance is a tool of social control, enhancing the power of social norms, which work more effectively when people are being observed by others in the community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Privacy problems are frequently misconstrued or inconsistently recognized in the law.
“Privacy problems are frequently misconstrued or inconsistently recognized in the law.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Privacy is not an individualistic right.
“This does not mean that privacy is an individualistic right.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Too much social control can adversely impact freedom, creativity, and self-development.
“Too much social control, however, can adversely impact freedom, creativity, and self-development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cohen, supra note 28
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schwartz, supra note 18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
This aspect of surveillance does not automatically make it harmful.
“This aspect of surveillance does not automatically make it harmful, though, since social control can be beneficial and every society must exercise a sizeable degree of social control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Social control can be beneficial and every society must exercise a sizeable degree of social control.
- Premisecitation
Social norms work more effectively when people are being observed by others in the community.
“which work more effectively when people are being observed by others in the community.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites RICHARD A. POSNER, THE PROBLEMATICS OF MORAL AND LEGAL THEORY 75 (1999)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Direct awareness of surveillance can make a person feel extremely uncomfortable.
“Not only can direct awareness of surveillance make a person feel extremely uncomfortable, but it can also cause that person to alter her behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Monitoring constrains the acceptable spectrum of belief and behavior.
“Monitoring constrains the “acceptable spectrum of belief and behavior,””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen, supra note 28
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Privacy violations involve a variety of types of harmful or problematic activities.
“In contrast, I have argued that privacy violations involve a variety of types of harmful or problematic activities.11”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Solove, Conceptualizing Privacy
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The lack of clarity about what privacy means creates difficulty for making policy or resolving cases because lawmakers and judges cannot easily articulate the privacy harm.
“This lack of clarity creates a difficulty when making policy or resolving a case because lawmakers and judges cannot easily articulate the privacy harm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Privacy harms include dignitary harms beyond reputational injury, such as incivility, lack of respect, or causing emotional angst.
“But as Warren and Brandeis understood, and as this taxonomy will demonstrate, there are other kinds of dignitary harm beyond reputational injury.These are the harms of incivility, lack of respect, or causing emotional angst.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Warren & Brandeis, 1890
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Risk-enhancing activities increase the chances of the individual suffering dignitary harms as well as monetary or physical harms.
“Such risk-enhancing activities increase the chances of the individual suffering dignitary harms as well as monetary or physical harms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Rather than targeting specific information, surveillance can ensnare a significant amount of data beyond any originally sought.
“Rather than targeting specific information, surveillance can ensnare a significant amount of data beyond any originally sought.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Evidentiary privileges, like the Fifth Amendment, are quite narrow in scope.
“Evidentiary privileges, like the Fifth Amendment, are also quite narrow in scope.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [136]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Interrogation forces people to be concerned about how they will explain themselves or how their refusal to answer will appear to others.
“Interrogation forces people to be concerned about how they will explain themselves or how their refusal to answer will appear to others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The dignitary harms and architectural problems of surveillance can occur both in public and private places.
“Thus, the dignitary harms and architectural problems of surveillance can occur both in public and private places.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Part of the harm of interrogation arises from the degree of coerciveness involved.
“Part of this harm arises from the degree of coerciveness involved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
There can be an even greater chilling effect when people are generally aware of the possibility of surveillance, but are never sure if they are being watched at any particular moment.
“In fact, there can be an even greater chilling effect when people are generally aware of the possibility of surveillance, but are never sure if they are being watched at any particular moment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Another aspect of the power of interrogation is its potential for resulting in distortion.
“Another aspect of the power of interrogation is its potential for resulting in distortion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Aggregation upsets expectations because it involves the combination of data in new, potentially unanticipated ways to reveal facts about a person that are not readily known.
“Aggregation upsets these expectations, because it involves the combination of data in new, potentially unanticipated ways to reveal facts about a person that are not readily known.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: People expect certain limits on what is known about them and on what others will find out.
- Premisecitation
Settled Fifth Amendment law focuses on the criminal consequences of disclosure rather than the nature of the disclosure.
“settled fifth amendment law focuses on the criminal consequences of disclosure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [130]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Well-concealed surveillance would still enable the watchers to gather a substantial degree of information about people, creating an architectural problem.
“While such well-concealed surveillance might eliminate the potential for any discomfort or chilling effect, it would still enable the watchers to gather a substantial degree of information about people, creating an architectural problem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In many areas of law, this narrow view of privacy has limited the recognition of privacy violations.
“In many areas of law, this narrow view of privacy has limited the recognition of privacy violations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
When analyzed, aggregated information can reveal new facts about a person that she did not expect would be known about her when the original, isolated data was collected.
“When analyzed, aggregated information can reveal new facts about a person that she did not expect would be known about her when the original, isolated data was collected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Despite strong public disapproval, the majority of courts have rejected a parent-child privilege.
“Despite strong public disapproval of forcing parents and children to testify against each other, the majority of courts have rejected a parentchild privilege.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [136]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Incriminating information may be compelled even under the Fifth Amendment if there are no criminal consequences, even if the compulsion would cause a person great disgrace.
“Incriminating information may thus be compelled even under the Fifth Amendment if there are no criminal consequences--even if the compulsion would cause a person great disgrace.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [131]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
The law tends to focus more on secrecy than on the particular problems and harms caused by surveillance.
“The law, however, tends to focus more on secrecy than on the particular problems and harms caused by surveillance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Aggregation can cause dignitary harms because it unsettles expectations.
“Alongside these benefits, however, aggregation can cause dignitary harms because of how it unsettles expectations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: People expect certain limits on what is known about them and on what others will find out.
- Interpretationreasoning
In questionnaires and standardized forms, distortion creeps in because the questions often do not ask for the entire story or are phrased in certain ways that yield deceptive results.
“In questionnaires and standardized forms, for example, distortion creeps in because the questions often do not ask for the entire story or are phrased in certain ways that yield deceptive results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
When bits and pieces of data are combined together, they begin to form a portrait of a person.
“But when combined together, bits and pieces of data begin to form a portrait of a person.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [147]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
People take offense when others ask an unduly probing question even if there is no compulsion to answer.
“People take offense when others ask an unduly probing question-even if there is no compulsion to answer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Surveillance is harmful in all settings, not just private ones.
“Therefore, although the law often focuses on whether surveillance occurs in a public or private place, surveillance is harmful in all settings, not just private ones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
One of the rationales justifying the privilege against self-incrimination is that it protects accuracy.
“Thus, one of the rationales justifying the privilege against self-incrimination is that it protects accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wigmore, supra note 118
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Unlike disclosure, interrogation can create discomfort even if the information is barely disseminated.
“unlike disclosure, interrogation can create discomfort even if the information is barely disseminated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Even in the absence of deliberate manipulation, the interrogation process can be distorting.
“Even in the absence of deliberate manipulation, the interrogation process can be distorting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When pieces of data are consolidated together, the aggregator acquires much greater knowledge about the person's life.
“When these pieces are consolidated together, however, the aggregator acquires much greater knowledge about the person's life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: People give out bits of information in different settings, only revealing a small part of themselves in each context.
- Rests on an assumption: People selectively spread around small pieces of data throughout most of their daily activities, and they have the expectation that in each disclosure, they are revealing relatively little about themselves.
- Premisereasoning
Aggregation's power and scope are different in the Information Age.
“But aggregation's power and scope are different in the Information Age;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Interrogation can be distorting because information is elicited by another, often without an interest in learning the whole story.
“Interrogation can be distorting because information is elicited by another, often without an interest in learning the whole story.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There are social norms against asking excessively probing or prying questions because they make the person being questioned feel uncomfortable.
“This is why, I believe, there are social norms against asking excessively probing or prying questions: they make the person being questioned feel uncomfortable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Awareness of the possibility of surveillance can be just as inhibitory as actual surveillance.
“Thus, awareness of the possibility of surveillance can be just as inhibitory as actual surveillance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Despite recognizing the harms and problems of interrogation-compulsion, divulgence of private information, and forced betrayal, the law only addresses them in limited situations.
“Despite recognizing the harms and problems of interrogation-compulsion, divulgence of private information, and forced betrayal--the law only addresses them in limited situations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Interrogation can create harm.
“However, interrogation can create harm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A skillful interrogator can orchestrate a dialogue that creates impressions and inferences that she wants to elicit.
“A skillful interrogator can orchestrate a dialogue that creates impressions and inferences that she wants to elicit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Identification is interrelated with other forms of privacy disruption.
“Identification is thus interrelated with other forms of privacy disruption, and, like those forms, it reveals, distorts, and intrudes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Identification can inhibit one's ability to be anonymous or pseudonymous.
“Identification can inhibit one's ability to be anonymous or pseudonymous.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [185]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Identification is a component of certain forms of surveillance.
“Identification is a component of certain forms of surveillance insofar as it facilitates the detection and monitoring of a person and enables surveillance data to be categorized according to the individuals to which it pertains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Anonymity also protects people who read or listen to certain unpopular ideas.
“Anonymity also protects people who read or listen to certain unpopular ideas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [188]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Identification can deter misleading political campaign ads.
“Identification can deter misleading political campaign ads.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The problem stems not from the identifier itself but from how it links data to individuals.
“The problem stems not from the identifier itself but from how it links data to individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court, the Court concluded that a law requiring people to identify themselves during a police stop did not violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.
“However, in Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court, the Court concluded that a law requiring people to identify themselves during a police stop did not violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [190]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Some forms of identification can have similar effects to disclosure.
“Some forms of identification can have similar effects to disclosure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Some courts have recognized aggregation as violating a privacy interest.
“Some courts have recognized aggregation as violating a privacy interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The digital person in digital space increasingly is affecting the flesh-and-blood individual in realspace.
“The digital person in digital space increasingly is affecting the flesh-and-blood individual in realspace.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [149]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Identification creates architectural problems, for it increases the government's power over individuals.
“Identification also creates architectural problems, for it increases the government's power over individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Identification has been a critical tool for governments seeking to round up radicals or disfavored citizens.
“Identification has been a critical tool for governments seeking to round up radicals or disfavored citizens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [183]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Reporters Committee is one of the rare instances where the law has recognized that aggregation can make a material difference in what is known about an individual.
“Reporters Committee is one of the rare instances where the law has recognized that aggregation can make a material difference in what is known about an individual.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Aggregations of data, such as credit reports, are used to evaluate data about a person's financial reputation and then make decisions that profoundly affect a person's life, including whether she gets a loan, a lease, or a mortgage.
“Aggregations of data, such as credit reports, are used to evaluate data about a person's financial reputation and then make decisions that profoundly affect a person's life, including whether she gets a loan, a lease, or a mortgage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Most courts adhere to the secrecy paradigm, which fails to recognize any privacy interest in information publicly available or already disseminated to others.
“Most courts adhere to the secrecy paradigm, which fails to recognize any privacy interest in information publicly available or already disseminated to others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
The dossier created by aggregating a person's data is often used as a way to judge her.
“The dossier created by aggregating a person's data is often used as a way to judge her.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Identification creates problems.
“Although identification of people or sources of particular messages can be beneficial, it also creates problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Courts have refused to find privacy interests in compilations of information disclosed in Megan's Laws.
“Differing from Reporters Committee, courts have refused to find privacy interests in compilations of information disclosed in Megan's Laws, which involve the dissemination of personal data about convicted sex-offenders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Aggregation would violate a privacy interest when the aggregation significantly increases what others know about a person, even if originating from public sources.
“In contrast, aggregation would violate a privacy interest when the aggregation significantly increases what others know about a person, even if originating from public sources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
In many instances, courts ignore insecurity as a problem.
“In many instances, courts ignore insecurity as a problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The primary legal protection against exclusion is statutory.
“The primary legal protection against exclusion is statutory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Insecurity can involve not only a threat of disclosure, but also a threat of distortion.
“Insecurity, therefore, can involve not only a threat of disclosure, but also a threat of distortion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The careless use of data by businesses and the government makes identity theft incredibly easy.
“The careless use of data by businesses and the government makes the crime of identity theft incredibly easy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The law is inconsistent in its recognition of breach of confidentiality as a harm.
“The law, however, is inconsistent in its recognition of breach of confidentiality as a harm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
As with secondary use and insecurity, exclusion creates a sense of vulnerability and uncertainty in individuals.
“As with secondary use and insecurity, exclusion creates a sense of vulnerability and uncertainty in individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Secondary use can cause problems.
“Secondary use can cause problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Fiduciary relationships have been held to protect privacy in certain relationships.
“Fiduciary relationships have been held to protect privacy in certain relationships.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [238]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Although insecurity increases the possibility of disclosure, courts will often not recognize a harm unless there has been actual disclosure.
“Although insecurity increases the possibility of disclosure, courts will often not recognize a harm unless there has been actual disclosure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Some courts have extended liability to third parties who induce the physician to disclose.
“Additionally, some courts have extended liability to third parties who induce the physician to disclose.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [253]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The opt-out right would most likely fail to constitute informed consent within a fiduciary relationship.
“Accordingly, it would most likely fail to constitute informed consent within a fiduciary relationship.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Applying Whalen, a federal circuit court concluded that certain questions on a police department employee questionnaire were unconstitutional because there were no guidelines about maintaining the security of the information.
“Applying Whalen, a federal circuit court in Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. City of Philadelphia concluded that certain questions on a police department employee questionnaire were unconstitutional because there were no guidelines about maintaining the security of the information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [205]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Exclusion is related to the harm of breach of confidentiality.
“In this way, exclusion is related to the harm of breach of confidentiality, which is discussed later in this taxonomy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Disclosure and breach of confidentiality cause different kinds of injuries.
“The answer, I posit, is that disclosure and breach of confidentiality cause different kinds of injuries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
In cases involving the constitutional right to privacy, courts have sometimes recognized insecurity as a privacy harm.
“In cases involving the constitutional right to privacy, courts have sometimes recognized insecurity as a privacy harm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [202]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [205]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Protection against breach of confidentiality helps promote certain relationships that depend upon trust.
“Protection against breach of confidentiality helps promote certain relationships that depend upon trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Being asked to identify oneself is being asked to link oneself to the data, not just state a name.
“Being asked to identify oneself, therefore, is being asked to link oneself to the data, not just state a name.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The tort of breach of confidentiality applies not only to physicians, but also to bankers and other professionals who maintain relationships of trust.
“The tort of breach of confidentiality applies not only to physicians, but also to bankers and other professionals who maintain relationships of trust.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [252]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Insecurity exposes people to potential future harm.
“Insecurity exposes people to potential future harm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Exclusion is related to insecurity because lack of accountability often goes hand-in-hand with inadequate security in record systems of personal data.
“Exclusion is also related to insecurity, as the lack of accountability often goes hand-in-hand with inadequate security in record systems of personal data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Some statutes also allow people to opt out of certain uses of information.
“Some statutes also allow people to opt out of certain uses of information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In certain relationships, such as between doctors and patients, fiduciary duties require informed consent.
“Moreover, in certain relationships, such as between doctors and patients, fiduciary duties require informed consent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [240]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Exclusion can be harmful even if it does not lead to the dissemination of data.
“Exclusion, however, can be harmful even if it does not lead to the dissemination of data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Secondary use creates a dignitary harm because it involves using information in ways to which a person does not consent and might not find desirable.
“It creates a dignitary harm, as it involves using information in ways to which a person does not consent and might not find desirable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Insecurity can be a cost of lack of identification.
“In this sense, insecurity can be a cost of lack of identification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Secondary use resembles the harm created by insecurity.
“In this respect, secondary use resembles the harm created by insecurity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Identity theft is made possible because individuals have digital dossiers-extensive repositories of personal information maintained by companies and institutions-that thieves can tap into.
“As I have argued elsewhere, identity theft is made possible because we all have “digital dossiers”-extensive repositories of personal information about us-that are maintained by various companies and institutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [194]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductnone given
Several privacy statutes allow people a mechanism to demand the correction of inaccurate information in their records.
“Several privacy statutes allow people a mechanism to demand the correction of inaccurate information in their records.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The opt-out right does not ensure that consent is informed beyond providing customers with notice that information may be shared.
“The optout right, which assumes consent unless an individual affirmatively indicates a preference for not sharing the information, does not ensure that consent is informed beyond providing customers with notice that information may be shared.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Insecurity is related to aggregation because it creates risks of downstream harm from inadequate protection of compendiums of personal data.
“Insecurity is related to aggregation, as it creates risks of downstream harm that can emerge from inadequate protection of compendiums of personal data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Insecurity is related to identification because it often occurs due to difficulties in linking data to people.
“Insecurity is also related to identification-it often occurs because of difficulties in linking data to people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Several privacy statutes attempt to avoid problems in measuring harm by providing for minimum liquidated damages.
“Several privacy statutes attempt to avoid problems in measuring harm by providing for minimum liquidated damages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [213]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The government's collection of personal data for its record systems is typically accompanied by a statutory or regulatory duty to avoid unwarranted disclosures.
“As the Court observed, the government's collection of personal data for its record systems “is typically accompanied by a concomitant statutory or regulatory duty to avoid unwarranted disclosures.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [203]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Distortion is related to insecurity because security problems can result in records being polluted with false data.
“Distortion-the dissemination of false information about a person-is related to insecurity, since problems with security can result in one's records being polluted with false data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In Whalen v. Roe, the Supreme Court suggested that the constitutional right to privacy extended to the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.
“In Whalen v. Roe, the Supreme Court suggested that the constitutional right to privacy also extended to the “individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [202]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductcitation
Unlike the tort of public disclosure, the tort of breach of confidentiality does not require that the disclosure be highly offensive.
“Unlike the tort of public disclosure, the tort of breach of confidentiality does not require that the disclosure be “highly offensive.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [250]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
In certain kinds of special relationships, tort law has developed strong duties and responsibilities.
“In certain kinds of special relationships, however, tort law has developed strong duties and responsibilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Secondary uses thwart people's expectations about how the data they give out will be used.
“Secondary uses thwart people's expectations about how the data they give out will be used.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: People have expectations about how the data they give out will be used.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Fourth Amendment law fails altogether to recognize the breach of confidentiality as a harm.
“Fourth Amendment law fails altogether to recognize the breach of confidentiality as a harm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Exposure creates injury because we have developed social practices to conceal aspects of life that we find animal-like or disgusting.
“Exposure creates injury because we have developed social practices to conceal aspects of life that we find animal-like or disgusting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
People often disclose information to a limited circle of friends and expect the information to stay within this group.
“People often disclose information to a limited circle of friends, and they expect the information to stay within this group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The third party doctrine is based on the secrecy paradigm: since others know the information, it is no longer completely secret.
“The third party doctrine is based on the secrecy paradigm: since others know the information, it is no longer completely secret.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Disclosure can inhibit people from associating with others, impinging upon freedom of association.
“Disclosure can inhibit people from associating with others, impinging upon freedom of association, and can also destroy anonymity, which is sometimes critical for the promotion of free expression.296”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [296]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
They are giving it to a party with implicit (and often explicit) promises that the information will not be disseminated.
“They are giving it to a party with implicit (and often explicit) promises that the information will not be disseminated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The breach of confidentiality tort applies to the patient-physician relationship and to other relationships as well.
“The breach of confidentiality tort applies to the patient-physician relationship and to other relationships as well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Norms about nudity and bodily functions have changed throughout history.
“Norms about nudity and bodily functions have changed throughout history.320”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [320]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductcitation
Some courts have held that the breach of confidentiality tort applies to banks.
“As mentioned previously, some courts have held that the tort applies to banks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [272]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Disclosure can harm even if the information is revealed by a stranger.
“Disclosure can harm even if the information is revealed by a stranger.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The fact that information is known to third parties would not be relevant to the Court's analysis if the harm were understood to be a breach of confidentiality.
“But the fact that the information is known to third parties would not be relevant to the Court's analysis if the harm were understood to be a breach of confidentiality.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Protection from disclosure promotes individual autonomy.
“Protection from disclosure, like free speech, promotes individual autonomy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The need for privacy, and therefore the prevention of exposure, is created by the fact that we have social relationships and concomitant norms of dignity and decorum.
“The need for privacy, and therefore the prevention of exposure, is created by the fact that we have social relationships and concomitant norms of dignity and decorum.324”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [324]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductnone given
Unlike Fourth Amendment law, tort law recognizes breach of confidentiality as a distinct harm.
“Unlike Fourth Amendment law, tort law recognizes breach of confidentiality as a distinct harm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When people establish a relationship with banks, Internet service providers, phone companies, and other businesses, they are not disclosing their information to the world.
“When people establish a relationship with banks, Internet service providers, phone companies, and other businesses, they are not disclosing their information to the world.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Disclosures of information from a person's past can inhibit their ability to reform, have a second chance, or alter their life's direction.
“People grow and change, and disclosures of information from their past can inhibit their ability to reform their behavior, to have a second chance, or to alter their life's direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Disclosure can threaten people's security.
“Disclosure can also threaten people's security.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The third party doctrine places an extensive amount of personal information outside the protection of the Fourth Amendment.
“The third party doctrine therefore places an extensive amount of personal information outside the protection of the Fourth Amendment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Some courts focus on secrecy and do not examine people's expectations of information flow.
“Some courts, however, focus on secrecy and do not examine people's expectations of information flow.312”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [312]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Exposure impedes a person's ability to participate in society.
“Exposure thus impedes a person's ability to participate in society.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The law has developed a number of protections against disclosures of true information about people.
“The law has developed a number of protections against disclosures of true information about people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When practices of concealment are disrupted by exposure, people can experience severe and sometimes debilitating humiliation and loss of self-esteem.
“When these practices are disrupted by exposure, people can experience a severe and sometimes debilitating humiliation and loss of self-esteem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In Whalen v. Roe, the Supreme Court recognized that the right to privacy based on substantive due process also encompassed the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.
“In Whalen v. Roe, the Supreme Court recognized that the “right to privacy” based on substantive due process also encompassed the “individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [278]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Today's norms and practices call for the concealment of many aspects of the body, bodily functions, and strong displays of emotion.
“Today's norms and practices, however, call for the concealment of many aspects of the body, bodily functions, and strong displays of emotion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The injury in Pavesich is that Pavesich has been used against his will.
“The injury is that Pavesich has been used against his will.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Most courts, due to their commitment to the secrecy paradigm, struggle with recognizing the harm of increased accessibility.
“Most courts, however, due to their commitment to the secrecy paradigm, struggle with recognizing this harm.346”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [346]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Exposure interacts with powerful and potent social norms.
“Exposure interacts with powerful and potent social norms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Blackmail allows a person to be dominated and controlled by another.
“Blackmail allows a person to be dominated and controlled by another.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Blackmail is criminalized because of the power relationship it creates.
“I posit that blackmail is criminalized because of the power relationship it creates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Federal courts, along with many state courts and agencies, are developing systems to place their records online.
“The federal courts, along with many state courts and agencies, are developing systems to place their records online.339”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [339]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
There is another important dimension of the harm of appropriation-an interference with freedom and self-development.
“I contend that there is another important dimension of the harm of appropriation-an interference with freedom and self-development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Information can readily be exploited for purposes other than those for which it was originally made publicly accessible.
“Information can readily be exploited for purposes other than those for which it was originally made publicly accessible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Generally, exposure cases have fared better than ones involving disclosure.
“Generally, exposure cases have fared better than ones involving disclosure.329”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [329]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The crux of the harm of appropriation is unwanted notoriety.
“Justice Gray alluded to what I believe to be the crux of the harm: unwanted notoriety.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Increased accessibility creates problems such as the increased possibility of disclosure.
“Increased accessibility, however, creates problems such as the increased possibility of disclosure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Intrusion can cause harm even if no information is involved.
“While many forms of intrusion are motivated by a desire to gather information or result in the revelation of information, intrusion can cause harm even if no information is involved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
In United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, the Supreme Court recognized the problem of increased accessibility.
“In United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, the Supreme Court recognized the problem of increased accessibility.349”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [349]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Failing to distinguish between disclosure and exposure has adversely affected the recognition of exposure harms in some instances.
“Failing to distinguish between disclosure and exposure has adversely affected the recognition of exposure harms in some instances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Without refuge from others, relationships can become more bitter and tense.
“Without refuge from others, relationships can become more bitter and tense.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The Supreme Court recognized the harm of increased accessibility.
“Here, the Court has recognized the harm of increased accessibility.352”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [352]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
The Fourth Amendment protects the home, as well as one's body and baggage, from searches by government officials.
“The Fourth Amendment protects the home, as well as one's body and baggage, from searches by government officials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
With increased accessibility, a difference in quantity becomes a difference in quality, enhancing the risk of the harms of disclosure.
“With increased accessibility, a difference in quantity becomes a difference in quality-it enhances the risk of the harms of disclosure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
With blackmail, the harm is not in the actual disclosure of the information, but in the control exercised by the one who makes the threat over the data subject.
“With blackmail, the harm is not in the actual disclosure of the information, but in the control exercised by the one who makes the threat over the data subject.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Due to internalization of these norms, exposure victims experience strong feelings of shame.
“Nevertheless, due to the internalization of these norms, exposure victims experience strong feelings of shame.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Under the secrecy paradigm, courts often view privacy as a binary status: information is either completely private or completely public.
“Under the secrecy paradigm, courts often view privacy as a binary status-information is either completely private or completely public.344”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [344]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Too much envelopment in society can be destructive to social relationships.
“Too much envelopment in society can be destructive to social relationships.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For disclosure, the crux of the harm is not the revelation of total secrets, but the spreading of information beyond expected boundaries.
“the crux of the disclosure harm, which is not the revelation of total secrets, but the spreading of information beyond expected boundaries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In Sanders v. American Broadcasting Companies, the court concluded that Sanders had a viable privacy interest even though he worked in a cubicle where he could readily be seen and overheard by other employees.
“Even though Sanders worked in a cubicle where he could readily be seen and overheard by other employees, the court concluded that he had a viable privacy interest”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [439]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [440]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Privacy problems are inconsistently recognized across different areas of the law.
“privacy problems are inconsistently recognized across different areas of the law.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In Roe v. Wade, the Court held that the right to privacy encompasses a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.
“Subsequently, the Court held in Roe v. Wade that the right to privacy”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [446]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Increased accessibility creates problems even when all of the data is already available in the public domain.
“The same is true of increased accessibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford, the Court held that a female plaintiff in a civil action could not be forced to submit to a surgical examination.
“There, the Court held that a female plaintiff in a civil action could not be forced to submit to a surgical examination”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [456]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Aggregation creates problems even when all of the data is already available in the public domain.
“Aggregation creates problems even when all of the data is already available in the public domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Beyond solitude, people often expect space from others even when they are with other people.
“However, beyond solitude, people often expect space from others-even when they are with other people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 193
- May combine two claims. 93
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe examples of activities typically referred to as privacy violations are clearly not the same.
“These violations are clearly not the same.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCourts and policymakers frequently struggle in recognizing privacy interests, and when this occurs, cases are dismissed or laws are not passed.
“Courts and policymakers frequently struggle in recognizing privacy interests, and when this occurs, cases are dismissed or laws are not passed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe Court has concluded that while the Fourth Amendment protects against surveillance in private places such as one's home, the Amendment has little applicability to surveillance in public places.
“Therefore, the Court has concluded that while the Fourth Amendment protects against surveillance in private places such as one's home, the Amendment has little applicability to surveillance in public places.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe Fifth Amendment certainly does not protect the information itself; if the same facts can be produced at trial via other witnesses or evidence, they are not prohibited.
“The Fifth Amendment certainly does not protect the information itself; if the same facts can be produced at trial via other witnesses or evidence, they are not prohibited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe Fifth Amendment's protection against interrogation is very limited.
“The Fifth Amendment's protection against interrogation is very limited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenPlaintiffs bringing claims involving surveillance in public have generally not been successful.
“In contrast, plaintiffs bringing claims involving surveillance in public have generally not been successful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationCompanies use Social Security numbers as passwords, and because SSNs can be readily obtained by identity thieves from public records or database companies, people's accounts and personal information are insecure.
“Companies use Social Security numbers (SSNs) as passwords, and since SSNs can be readily obtained by identity thieves from public records or from database companies, people's accounts and personal information are insecure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [201]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn 1902, in Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co., a flour company included a lithograph of Abigail Roberson, a minor, on 25,000 advertisement flyers without her consent.
“In 1902, in Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co., a flour company included a lithograph of Abigail Roberson, a minor, on 25,000 advertisement flyers without her consent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenA number of privacy statutes ensure accuracy in record systems.
“In addition to false light and defamation, a number of privacy statutes ensure accuracy in record systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningPrivacy is too complicated a concept to be boiled down to a single essence.
“Privacy is too complicated a concept to be boiled down to a single essence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNew technologies have given rise to a panoply of different privacy problems, and many of them do not readily fit into Prosser's four categories.
“New technologies have given rise to a panoply of different privacy problems, and many of them do not readily fit into Prosser's four categories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenArchitectural problems are akin to environmental harms or pollution.
“They are akin, in many ways, to environmental harms or pollution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCourts and policymakers frequently have a singular view of privacy in mind when they assess whether or not an activity violates privacy.
“Courts and policymakers frequently have a singular view of privacy in mind when they assess whether or not an activity violates privacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs a result, courts and policymakers either conflate distinct privacy problems despite significant differences or fail to recognize a problem entirely.
“As a result, they either conflate distinct privacy problems despite significant differences or fail to recognize a problem entirely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningPrivacy is the relief from a range of kinds of social friction.
“Privacy is the relief from a range of kinds of social friction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationPrivacy is best understood as a family resemblance concept.
“Elsewhere, I have argued that privacy is best understood as a family resemblance concept.30”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wittgenstein, 1968
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Solove, Conceptualizing Privacy
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrivacy is a vague concept that appears to be about everything and therefore nothing.
“Privacy seems to be about everything, and therefore it appears to be nothing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenVarious problems referred to as privacy violations bear substantial similarities to each other.
“It is no accident that various problems are referred to as privacy violations; they bear substantial similarities to each other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenAs with visual surveillance, audio surveillance has long been viewed as troubling.
“As with visual surveillance, audio surveillance has long been viewed as troubling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The law can serve as a source for determining what privacy violations society recognizes.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany discussions of privacy appeal to fears and anxieties, and commentators often fail to translate those instincts into a reasoned account of why privacy problems are harmful.
“Many discussions of privacy appeal to people's fears and anxieties.9 What commentators often fail to do, however, is translate those instincts into a reasoned, well-articulated account of why privacy problems are harmful.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Whitman, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEach of these groups consists of different related subgroups of harmful activities.
“Each of these groups consists of different related subgroups of harmful activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningPrivacy is not freedom from all forms of social friction; rather, it is protection from a cluster of related activities that impinge upon people in related ways.
“Of course, privacy is not freedom from all forms of social friction; rather, it is protection from a cluster of related activities that impinge upon people in related ways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDeclaring that an activity is harmful or problematic does not automatically imply that there should be legal redress, since there may be valid reasons why the law should not get involved or why countervailing interests should prevail.
“Of course, declaring that an activity is harmful or problematic does not automatically imply that there should be legal redress, since there may be valid reasons why the law should not get involved or why countervailing interests should prevail.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningA new taxonomy to address privacy violations for contemporary times is sorely needed.
“Therefore, a new taxonomy to address privacy violations for contemporary times is sorely needed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
- Rests on an assumption: The law can serve as a source for determining what privacy violations society recognizes.
- Rests on an assumption: The question of which matters and activities are private is too culturally variable and contextual to be the focus of the taxonomy.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPervasive monitoring of every first move or false start will, at the margin, incline choices toward the bland and the mainstream.
“pervasive monitoring of every first move or false start will, at the margin, incline choices toward the bland and the mainstream.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen, supra note 28
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDespite the wide-ranging body of law addressing privacy issues today, commentators often lament the law's inability to adequately protect privacy.
“Despite the wide-ranging body of law addressing privacy issues today, commentators often lament the law's inability to adequately protect privacy.18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] 18. U.S.C. § 6802(c) (2000). 230
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe collection of information itself can constitute a harmful activity; not all information collection is harmful, but certain kinds of collection can be.
“The collection of this information itself can constitute a harmful activity.Not all information collection is harmful, but certain kinds of collection can be.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningImbalances in power can be risk enhancing, in that they increase the risk of abuses of power.
“Imbalances in power can also be risk enhancing, in that they increase the risk of abuses of power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenArchitectural problems involve less the overt insult or reputational harm to a person and more the creation of the risk that a person might be harmed in the future.
“They involve less the overt insult or reputational harm to a person and more the creation of the risk that a person might be harmed in the future.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe general progression from information collection to processing to dissemination is the data moving further away from the control of the individual.
“The general progression from information collection to processing to dissemination is the data moving further away from the control of the individual.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningIf a person consents to most of these activities, there is no privacy violation.
“If a person consents to most of these activities, there is no privacy violation.28”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenInformation collection creates disruption based on the process of data gathering; even if no information is revealed publicly, information collection can create harm.
“Information collection creates disruption based on the process of data gathering.Even if no information is revealed publicly, information collection can create harm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisereasoningTwo kinds of architectural issues emerge most often: enhancement of the risk that a harm will occur, and upsetting the balance of social or institutional power in undesirable ways.
“In the taxonomy, two kinds of architectural issues emerge most often.First is the enhancement of the risk that a harm will occur.”
- Also stated in: § 2006] · plain
“Second, a particular activity can upset the balance of social or institutional power in undesirable ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 2006] · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAttempts to find such an essence often end up being too broad and vague, with little usefulness in addressing concrete issues.
“Attempts to find such an essence often end up being too broad and vague, with little usefulness in addressing concrete issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMonitoring results in a subtle yet fundamental shift in the content of our character, a blunting and blurring of rough edges and sharp lines.
“and it results in “a subtle yet fundamental shift in the content of our character, a blunting and blurring of rough edges and sharp lines.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen, supra note 28
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenThere are four basic groups of harmful activities: information collection, information processing, information dissemination, and invasion.
“In the taxonomy that follows, there are four basic groups of harmful activities: (1) information collection, (2) information processing, (3) information dissemination, and (4) invasion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
- Rests on an assumption: The question of which matters and activities are private is too culturally variable and contextual to be the focus of the taxonomy.
- Rests on an assumption: The taxonomy can be useful for the law even though it limits its focus to activities that harm or cause problems for private matters or activities.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThese activities often are not inherently problematic or harmful.
“These activities often are not inherently problematic or harmful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenFor a long time, surveillance has been viewed as problematic.
“For a long time, surveillance has been viewed as problematic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The law can serve as a source for determining what privacy violations society recognizes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningThe whole becomes greater than the parts.
“The whole becomes greater than the parts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [147]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenLike disclosure, interrogation often involves the divulging of concealed information.
“Like disclosure, interrogation often involves the divulging of concealed information;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe law protects against interrogation, but it does so in a complicated and unsystematic way.
“Although the law protects against interrogation, it does so in a complicated and unsystematic way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPrivacy law's theory of interrogation is not only incoherent, it is nearly nonexistent.
“Privacy law's theory of interrogation is not only incoherent, it is nearly nonexistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Fifth Amendment is therefore concerned only partly with the type of information involved; its applicability turns on compelled self-disclosure.
“The Fifth Amendment is therefore concerned only partly with the type of information involved--its applicability turns on compelled self-disclosure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSurveillance is a sweeping form of investigatory power.
“Surveillance is a sweeping form of investigatory power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenWell-concealed surveillance might eliminate the potential for any discomfort or chilling effect.
“While such well-concealed surveillance might eliminate the potential for any discomfort or chilling effect, it would still enable the watchers to gather a substantial degree of information about people, creating an architectural problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCompulsion can consist of the fear of not getting a job or of social opprobrium.
“Compulsion can consist of the fear of not getting a job or of social opprobrium.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe process of combining data in the Information Age is much easier than before.
“the process of combining it is much easier,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSurveillance threatens not only to chill the expression of eccentric individuality, but also, gradually, to dampen the force of our aspirations to it.
“Surveillance thus “threatens not only to chill the expression of eccentric individuality, but also, gradually, to dampen the force of our aspirations to it.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen, supra note 28
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFor interrogation generally, the compulsion need not be direct; nor must it rise to the level of outright coercion.
“However, for interrogation generally, the compulsion need not be direct; nor must it rise to the level of outright coercion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSurveillance inhibits freedom of choice, impinging upon self-determination.
“Similarly, Paul Schwartz argues that surveillance inhibits freedom of choice, impinging upon selfdetermination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwartz, supra note 18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningPeople still feel some degree of compulsion because not answering might create the impression that they have something to hide.
“One explanation may be that people still feel some degree of compulsion because not answering might create the impression that they have something to hide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAs long as use immunity is granted, the government is free to compel even the most damning and private disclosures.
“As long as use immunity is granted, the government is free to compel even the most damning and private disclosures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [130]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCombining information creates synergies.
“This occurs because combining information creates synergies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationSurveillance in public can certainly cause uneasiness.
“Surveillance in public can certainly cause uneasiness, as illustrated by the example of being stared at continuously in public.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningSurveillance extends beyond a search, for it records behavior, social interaction, and potentially everything that a person says and does.
“It extends beyond a search, for it records behavior, social interaction, and potentially everything that a person says and does.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn cross-examination, a skilled attorney can carefully manipulate what a witness says and can intimidate a witness into coming across less favorably.
“In cross-examination, a skilled attorney can carefully manipulate what a witness says and can intimidate a witness into coming across less favorably.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf watched long enough, a person might be caught in some form of illegal or immoral activity, and this information could then be used to discredit or blackmail her.
“If watched long enough, a person might be caught in some form of illegal or immoral activity, and this information could then be used to discredit or blackmail her.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIf the information is not previously hidden, then no privacy interest is implicated by the collection or dissemination of the information.
“If the information is not previously hidden, then no privacy interest is implicated by the collection or dissemination of the information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThis understanding of privacy stems from what the author calls the secrecy paradigm.
“This understanding of privacy stems from what I call the “secrecy paradigm.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenCombining data and analyzing it can be put to beneficial uses.
“Combining data and analyzing it certainly can be put to beneficial uses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe data gathered about people in the Information Age is significantly more extensive than before.
“the data gathered about people is significantly more extensive,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningInterrogation resembles intrusion in its invasiveness, for interrogation is a probing, a form of searching.
“Interrogation resembles intrusion in its invasiveness, for interrogation is a probing, a form of searching.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCredit reporting allows creditors to assess people's financial reputations in a world where first-hand experience of the financial condition and trustworthiness of individuals is often lacking.
“Credit reporting allows creditors to assess people's financial reputations in a world where first-hand experience of the financial condition and trustworthiness of individuals is often lacking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [148]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe computer technologies to analyze data in the Information Age are more sophisticated and powerful than before.
“and the computer technologies to analyze it are more sophisticated and powerful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIt remains unclear what interests the Fifth Amendment protects.
“It remains unclear what interests the Fifth Amendment protects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [135]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTo some degree, surveillance resembles interrogation, for both involve the involuntary gathering of information.
“To some degree, surveillance resembles interrogation, for both involve the involuntary gathering of information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenAggregation is a way to acquire information about people.
“Like surveillance, aggregation is a way to acquire information about people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDouglas's view that the Fifth Amendment protects against infamy as well as prosecution has not been accepted in Fifth Amendment doctrine.
“Nevertheless, Douglas's view has not been accepted in Fifth Amendment doctrine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe interrogator possesses extraordinary control over what information is elicited, how it is interpreted, and the impressions created by its revelations.
“The interrogator possesses extraordinary control over what information is elicited, how it is interpreted, and the impressions created by its revelations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenInterrogation occurs with the conscious awareness of the subject; surveillance can be clandestine.
“Interrogation, however, occurs with the conscious awareness of the subject; surveillance can be clandestine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAggregation reveals facts about data subjects in ways far beyond anything they expected when they gave out the data.
“It reveals facts about data subjects in ways far beyond anything they expected when they gave out the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: People expect certain limits on what is known about them and on what others will find out.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningIdentification resembles interrogation in some ways.
“In some ways, identification resembles interrogation, as identification often involves the questioning of individuals to compel them to identify themselves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningLike those forms, identification reveals, distorts, and intrudes.
“and, like those forms, it reveals, distorts, and intrudes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThis case illustrates how identification can inhibit people's ability to change and can prevent their selfdevelopment by tying them to a past from which they want to escape.
“This case illustrates how identification can inhibit people's ability to change and can prevent their selfdevelopment by tying them to a past from which they want to escape.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [180]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationRequiring the disclosure of identifying information would chill free speech, violating the First Amendment.
“Thus, requiring the disclosure of identifying information would chill free speech, violating the First Amendment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLegally, the cases have drawn a line, but conceptually, no justification has been offered for the limitation.
“Legally, the cases have drawn a line, but conceptually, no justification has been offered for the limitation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenData compilations reveal facets of our lives, but the data is often reductive and disconnected from the original context in which it was gathered.
“They reveal facets of our lives, but the data is often reductive and disconnected from the original context in which it was gathered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningIdentification enables us to attempt to verify identity.
“Identification enables us to attempt to verify identity--that the person accessing her records is indeed the owner of the account or the subject of the records.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningAggregation is a less direct form of data acquisition than surveillance, for it occurs through processing data already gathered from individuals.
“However, aggregation is a less direct form of data acquisition than surveillance, for it occurs through processing data already gathered from individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese cases limited Reporters Committee to the FOIA context, but they did not supply a reason why recognizing a privacy interest in aggregated data is necessarily linked only to FOIA and does not apply to other areas of law.
“These cases limited Reporters Committee to the FOIA context, but they did not supply a reason why recognizing a privacy interest in aggregated data is necessarily linked only to FOIA and does not apply to other areas of law.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisenone givenIdentification involves a particular form of true information (one's identity), which enables databases of information to be linked to people.
“Identification involves a particular form of true information (one's identity), which enables databases of information to be linked to people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnonymity provides people with the ability to criticize the companies they work for and to blow the whistle.
“Anonymity provides people with the ability to criticize the companies they work for and to blow the whistle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [187]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the United States, passports were used to stifle dissent; since Communists during the McCarthy era were prohibited from using passports, they were restricted from traveling outside the country.
“In the United States, passports were used to stifle dissent; since Communists during the McCarthy era were prohibited from using passports, they were restricted from traveling outside the country.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [184]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAggregation can lead to architectural problems; it can increase the power that others have over individuals.
“Aggregation can also lead to architectural problems; it can increase the power that others have over individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningI do not agree that identification is inherently demeaning to dignity.
“Therefore, I do not agree that identification is inherently demeaning to dignity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningIdentification diverges because it is primarily a form of connecting data to people.
“Identification diverges, however, because it is primarily a form of connecting data to people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAnonymity can enhance the persuasiveness of one's ideas, for identification can shade reception of ideas with readers' biases and prejudices.
“Anonymity can enhance the persuasiveness of one's ideas, for identification can shade reception of ideas with readers' biases and prejudices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningIdentification links the digital person directly to a person in realspace.
“Identification goes a step further--it links the digital person directly to a person in realspace.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningIdentification is similar to aggregation as both involve the combination of different pieces of information, one being the identity of a person.
“Identification is similar to aggregation as both involve the combination of different pieces of information, one being the identity of a person.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn order to access various accounts, people's identity must be verified, a step that can reduce fraud and enhance accountability.
“In order to access various accounts, people's identity must be verified, a step that can reduce fraud and enhance accountability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningBecause it connects people to data, identification attaches informational baggage to people.
“Because it connects people to data, identification attaches informational baggage to people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis leads to distortion.
“This leads to distortion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenA national identification card has been explicitly rejected in the United States.
“Although proposed many times in the United States, a national identification card has been explicitly rejected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIdentification is an efficient tool for controlling people.
“It is also an efficient tool for controlling people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe identification marker conveys certain information and often bears a particular stigma.
“The identification marker conveys certain information and often bears a particular stigma.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe 1973 report Records, Computers, and the Rights of Citizens concluded that a standard universal identifier should not be established in the United States now or in the foreseeable future.
“We take the position that a standard universal identifier (SUI) should not be established in the United States now or in the foreseeable future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [168]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIdentification requirements such as this one can help prevent misinformation and enable people to better assess the ad.
“Identification requirements such as this one can help prevent misinformation and enable people to better assess the ad.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningIdentification is a means to link people to data, not necessarily an indication that people are the equivalent of their identifying characteristics.
“But, identification is a means to link people to data, not necessarily an indication that people are the equivalent of their identifying characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenNonexpressive means of identification, such as fingerprints, identify people without signaling anything to the public.
“In contrast, nonexpressive means of identification, such as fingerprints, identify people without signaling anything to the public.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIdentification often involves the questioning of individuals to compel them to identify themselves.
“as identification often involves the questioning of individuals to compel them to identify themselves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere is an increasing tendency for the Social Security number to be used as if it were an SUI.
“However, there is an increasing tendency for the Social Security number to be used as if it were an SUI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [168]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIdentification enables us to confirm the identity of a person and to discover the perpetrator of a crime from traces left behind.
“Identification enables us not only to confirm the identity of a person, but also to discover the perpetrator of a crime from traces left behind, such as fingerprints and genetic material.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [170]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIdentification facilitates the detection and monitoring of a person and enables surveillance data to be categorized according to the individuals to which it pertains.
“it facilitates the detection and monitoring of a person and enables surveillance data to be categorized according to the individuals to which it pertains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningIdentification is related to disclosure in that both involve the revelation of true information.
“Identification is related to disclosure in that both involve the revelation of true information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIdentification has many benefits.
“Identification has many benefits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [171]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis prevented the applicant from concealing the fact she was a transsexual and effectively assuming a female identity.
“it prevented her from concealing the fact she was a transsexual and effectively assuming a female identity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [177]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnonymity and pseudonymity protect people from bias based on their identities and enable people to vote, speak, and associate more freely by protecting them from the danger of reprisal.
“Anonymity and pseudonymity protect people from bias based on their identities and enable people to vote, speak, and associate more freely by protecting them from the danger of reprisal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [186]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningData compilations are often both telling and incomplete.
“Data compilations are often both telling and incomplete.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationUnder federal election law, television ads advocating the election or defeat of a candidate must identify the person or group placing the ad.
“Under federal election law, television ads advocating the election or defeat of a candidate must identify the person or group placing the ad.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [172]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationAlthough the law recognizes injuries when a breach in security results in overt harm to an individual, courts are reluctant to find harm simply from the insecure storage of information.
“Although the law recognizes injuries when a breach in security results in overt harm to an individual, courts are reluctant to find harm simply from the insecure storage of information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [212]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSecondary use resembles breach of confidentiality in that there is a betrayal of the person's expectations when giving out information.
“Secondary use resembles breach of confidentiality, in that there is a betrayal of the person's expectations when giving out information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: People have expectations about how the data they give out will be used.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAn inability to participate in the maintenance and use of one's information can lead to feelings of powerlessness and frustration.
“An inability to participate in the maintenance and use of one's information can lead to feelings of powerlessness and frustration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe disclosure tort also protects relationships of trust, but disclosure must result in the release of embarrassing secrets or discrediting data before courts will consider it to be harmful.
“The disclosure tort also protects relationships of trust, but disclosure must result in the release of embarrassing secrets or discrediting data before courts will consider it to be harmful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWhile these statutes stop short of requiring informed consent, they do give people some ability to discover the information gathered about them.
“While these statutes stop short of requiring informed consent, they do give people some ability to discover the information gathered about them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStevens's dissent recognizes that the harm of identification is often not in the disclosure of the identifying marker itself, but in the ability to connect this marker to a stream of collected data.
“Stevens's dissent recognizes that the harm of identification is often not in the disclosure of the identifying marker (the name, fingerprint, etc.) itself, but in the ability to connect this marker to a stream of collected data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [192]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPeople might not give out data if they know about a potential secondary use, such as for telemarketing, spam, or other forms of intrusive advertising.
“People might not give out data if they know about a potential secondary use, such as for telemarketing, spam, or other forms of intrusive advertising.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIn a world where personal information is increasingly used to make important decisions about our lives, powerlessness in this arena can be significantly troublesome.
“But in a world where personal information is increasingly used to make important decisions about our lives, powerlessness in this arena can be significantly troublesome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Personal information is increasingly used to make important decisions about our lives.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe harm of secondary use is a dignitary one, emerging from denying people control over the future use of their data, which can be used in ways that have significant effects on their lives.
“The harm is a dignitary one, emerging from denying people control over the future use of their data, which can be used in ways that have significant effects on their lives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe potential for secondary use generates fear and uncertainty over how one's information will be used in the future, creating a sense of powerlessness and vulnerability.
“The potential for secondary use generates fear and uncertainty over how one's information will be used in the future, creating a sense of powerlessness and vulnerability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningExclusion is a harm created by being shut out from participating in the use of one's personal data, by not being informed about how that data is used, and by not being able to do anything to affect how it is used.
“Rather, it is a harm created by being shut out from participating in the use of one's personal data, by not being informed about how that data is used, and by not being able to do anything to affect how it is used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIdentity theft occurs because creditors and credit-reporting agencies often lack both the means and the incentives to correctly identify the persons who seek credit from them or on whom they report.
“As Lynn LoPucki observes, identity theft occurs because “creditors and credit-reporting agencies often lack both the means and the incentives to correctly identify the persons who seek credit from them or on whom they report.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [197]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningFederal privacy statutes guard against exclusion by mandating transparency and granting individuals the right to access their information.
“Federal privacy statutes guard against exclusion by mandating transparency and granting individuals the right to access their information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningExclusion is different from insecurity in that exclusion is not primarily a harm caused by lack of protection against data leakage or contamination.
“Exclusion is different than insecurity in that exclusion is not primarily a harm caused by the lack of protection against data leakage or contamination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningBreach of confidentiality requires only a betrayal of trust, regardless of the nature of the data revealed.
“Breach of confidentiality requires only a betrayal of trust, regardless of the nature of the data revealed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningWhen removed from the original context in which it was collected, data can more readily be misunderstood.
“When removed from the original context in which it was collected, data can more readily be misunderstood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDisclosure differs from insecurity because the harm caused by disclosure is the actual leakage of information, while insecurity is the injury of being placed in a weakened state and made more vulnerable to future harms.
“What the court failed to recognize is that disclosure differs from insecurity because the harm caused by disclosure is the actual leakage of information; insecurity is the injury of being placed in a weakened state, of being made more vulnerable to a range of future harms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTort law has at least recognized the concept of accountability, although courts have not recognized the maintenance of personal information about a person as giving rise to fiduciary obligations.
“Therefore, tort law has at least recognized the concept of accountability, although courts have not recognized the maintenance of personal information about a person as giving rise to fiduciary obligations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth disclosure and breach of confidentiality involve the revelation of secrets about a person, but breaches of confidentiality also violate the trust in a specific relationship.
“Both involve the revelation of secrets about a person, but breaches of confidentiality also violate the trust in a specific relationship.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenTort law, by and large, has not recognized exclusion as a harm.
“Tort law, by and large, has not recognized exclusion as a harm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe law of fiduciary duties creates special duties of accountability within certain relationships.
“The law of fiduciary duties creates special duties of accountability within certain relationships.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMany privacy statutes require that information be kept secure.
“Many privacy statutes require that information be kept secure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe harm from a breach of confidence is not simply that information has been disclosed, but that the victim has been betrayed.
“The harm from a breach of confidence, then, is not simply that information has been disclosed, but that the victim has been betrayed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExclusion creates an architectural problem.
“Exclusion, however, creates an architectural problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExclusion reduces accountability on the part of government agencies and businesses that maintain records about individuals.
“Exclusion reduces accountability on the part of government agencies and businesses that maintain records about individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationWhen information is released publicly, it can be used in a host of unforeseeable ways, creating problems related to secondary use.
“Moreover, when information is released publicly, it can be used in a host of unforeseeable ways, creating problems related to those caused by secondary use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationEven if employers are correct that a prospective employee with a genetic risk is riskier to hire, such a rational discriminatory employment decision has costs.
“Even if employers are correct that a prospective employee with a genetic risk for developing a certain condition is, on balance, riskier to hire than a prospective employee without such a predisposition, even such a rational discriminatory employment decision has its costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe law often protects against disclosure when the information is kept secret but not when others know about it.
“The law often protects against disclosure when the information is kept secret but not when others know about it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationMany other courts have agreed that banks have a duty of confidentiality.
“Many other courts have agreed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [276]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenExposure involves exposing to others certain physical and emotional attributes about a person.
“Exposure involves the exposing to others of certain physical and emotional attributes about a person.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe attributes involved in exposure are viewed as deeply primordial, and their exposure often creates embarrassment and humiliation.
“These are attributes that people view as deeply primordial, and their exposure often creates embarrassment and humiliation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe third party doctrine provides that if information is possessed or known by third parties, then, for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, an individual lacks a reasonable expectation of privacy in the information.
“This doctrine provides that if information is possessed or known by third parties, then, for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, an individual lacks a reasonable expectation of privacy in the information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [268]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIn certain activities, we are vulnerable and weak, such as when we are nude or going to the bathroom.
“Further, in certain activities, we are vulnerable and weak, such as when we are nude or going to the bathroom.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationKnowing bits and pieces of gossip about a person often does not paint a more complete portrait and can lead to misimpressions and condemnation without full understanding.
“Knowing bits and pieces of gossip about a person will often not paint a more complete portrait; it can lead to misimpressions and condemnation without full understanding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIf a fact about a person is known to others, many courts conclude that it is no longer private.
“Moreover, if a fact about a person is known to others, many courts conclude that it is no longer private.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe harm in disclosure is damage to reputation caused by dissemination, whereas the harm in breach of confidentiality is violation of trust in the relationship.
“Disclosure differs from breach of confidentiality because the harm in disclosure involves the damage to reputation caused by the dissemination; the harm with breach of confidentiality is the violation of trust in the relationship.289”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [289]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDignity is a part of being civilized; it involves the ability to transcend one's animal nature.
“Dignity is a part of being civilized; it involves the ability to transcend one's animal nature.323”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [323]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDisclosure involves spreading information beyond existing networks of information flow.
“Lior Strahilevitz aptly observes that disclosure involves spreading information beyond existing networks of information flow.311”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [311]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationVarious states have restricted the disclosure of particular forms of information, such as medical data and alcohol and drug abuse.
“Various states have restricted the disclosure of particular forms of information, such as medical data and alcohol and drug abuse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [286]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationSociety may want to inhibit certain rational judgments, such as employment decisions based on genetic information.
“Likewise, society may want to inhibit certain rational judgments, such as employment decisions based on genetic information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDisclosure controls through imposition of social sanctions and condemnation, whereas exposure works by stripping people of their dignity.
“Disclosure is a power that controls through the imposition of social sanctions and condemnation.Exposure works in a different way, by stripping people of their dignity.327”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [327]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationWe have been socialized into concealing these activities.
“We have been socialized into concealing these activities.319”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [319]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExposure rarely reveals significant new information that can be used in the assessment of a person's character or personality.
“cant new information that can be used in the assessment of a person's character or personality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationDisclosure protections guard against irrational judgment based on stereotypes or misinformation about diseases.
“tional judgment based on stereotypes of misinformation about diseases.300”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [300]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationPeople want to protect information that makes them vulnerable or that can be used by others to harm them physically, emotionally, financially, and reputationally.
“People want to protect information that makes them vulnerable or that can be used by others to harm them physically, emotionally, financially, and reputationally.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEven though most people would not view a victim of exposure as a lesser person or less civilized, victims feel that way.
“Even though most people would not view a victim of exposure as a lesser person or as being less civilized, victims feel that way.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationGenetic-based employment decisions may penalize people for things they cannot control and deter people from learning their genetic makeup.
“Such decisions may penalize people for things they cannot control and deter people from learning their genetic makeup.301”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [301]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationA few courts have come to different conclusions regarding whether there is a privacy interest in information communicated to others.
“A few courts, however, have come to different conclusions regarding whether there is a privacy interest in information communicated to others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationGrief, suffering, trauma, injury, nudity, sex, urination, and defecation all involve primal aspects of our lives that are physical, instinctual, and necessary.
“Grief, suffering, trauma, injury, nudity, sex, urination, and defecation all involve primal aspects of our lives-ones that are physical, instinctual, and necessary.318”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [318]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDisclosure can destroy anonymity, which is sometimes critical for the promotion of free expression.
“Disclosure can inhibit people from associating with others, impinging upon freedom of association, and can also destroy anonymity, which is sometimes critical for the promotion of free expression.296”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [296]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningProtecting against disclosure limits freedom of speech, but disclosure can inhibit the very interests free speech protects.
“Although protecting against disclosure does limit freedom of speech, disclosure can inhibit the very interests free speech protects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn the Information Age, much of what we do is recorded by third parties.
“In the Information Age, much of what we do is recorded by third parties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In the Information Age, much of what we do is recorded by third parties.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationDisclosure protections further democratic self-governance.
“Second, as with free speech, disclosure protections further democratic self-governance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationDisclosure of information about a person can distort our assessments rather than enhance our ability to judge her.
“In many instances, disclosure of information about a person will not enhance our ability to judge her; in fact, it can distort our assessments.299”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [299]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationAlthough this branch of the right to privacy has not received much further elaboration by the Court, it is recognized in many circuits, where it can enable plaintiffs to sue government officials for disclosing personal information.
“Although this branch of the right to privacy has not received much further elaboration by the Court, it is recognized in many circuits, where it can enable plaintiffs to sue government officials for disclosing personal information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [279]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningWe protect against the exposure of bodily aspects because this protection safeguards human dignity as defined by modern society.
“We protect against the exposure of these bodily aspects because this protection safeguards human dignity as defined by modern society.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThe harm of disclosure is not so much the elimination of secrecy as the spreading of information beyond expected boundaries.
“The harm of disclosure is not so much the elimination of secrecy as it is the spreading of information beyond expected boundaries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSolitude does not detract from a rich public life, but in fact enhances it.
“In other words, solitude does not detract from a rich public life, but in fact enhances it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCompanies are gathering data from public records to use for commercial and marketing purposes or to create dossiers on individuals for profiling and other analysis.
“For example, companies are gathering data from public records to use for commercial and marketing purposes or to create dossiers on individuals for profiling and other analysis.342”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [342]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe harm caused by intrusion differs from that caused by other types of disruption because intrusion interrupts one's activities through the unwanted presence or activities of another person.
“The harm caused by intrusion, however, differs from that caused by other types of disruption because intrusion interrupts one's activities through the unwanted presence or activities of another person.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDistortion not only affects the aggrieved individual; it also affects the society that judges that individual: it interferes with our relationships to that individual, and it inhibits our ability to assess the character of those that we deal with.
“Distortion not only affects the aggrieved individual; it also affects the society that judges that individual: it interferes with our relationships to that individual, and it inhibits our ability to assess the character of those that we deal with.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBoth distortion and disclosure can result in embarrassment, humiliation, stigma, and reputational harm.
“Both distortion and disclosure can result in embarrassment, humiliation, stigma, and reputational harm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationBlackmail does not seem to be about preventing disclosure, for prohibiting a blackmailer compensation for silence will likely make disclosure more probable.
“Blackmail does not seem to be about preventing disclosure, for as Joseph Izenberg argues, prohibiting a blackmailer compensation for silence will likely make disclosure more probable.359”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [359]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhen people willingly transgress norms, society has a strong interest in shaming them, and it is socially beneficial for these norms to be internalized and result in feelings of shame.
“When people willingly transgress these norms, society has a strong interest in shaming them, and it is socially beneficial for these norms to be internalized and to result in feelings of shame.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningOnce information is released into the public domain, it is no longer private.
“Accordingly, once information is released into the public domain, it is no longer private.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe interest safeguarded by protections against appropriation is control of the way one presents oneself to society.
“The interest safeguarded by protections against appropriation is control of the way one presents oneself to society.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIntrusion disturbs the victim's daily activities, alters her routines, destroys her solitude, and often makes her feel uncomfortable and uneasy.
“It disturbs the victim's daily activities, alters her routines, destroys her solitude, and often makes her feel uncomfortable and uneasy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIntrusion need not involve spatial incursions: spam, junk mail, junk faxes, and telemarketing are disruptive in a similar way, as they sap people's time and attention and interrupt their activities.
“Intrusion need not involve spatial incursions: spam, junk mail, junk faxes, and telemarketing are disruptive in a similar way, as they sap people's time and attention and interrupt their activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenDistortion differs from disclosure because with distortion, the information revealed is false and misleading.
“Distortion differs from disclosure, however, because with distortion, the information revealed is false and misleading.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDistortion's direct impact is felt by the aggrieved individual, but it has effects for all of society.
“Distortion's direct impact is felt by the aggrieved individual, but it has effects for all of society.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDistortion is included in the taxonomy of privacy because of its significant similarity to other privacy disruptions.
“I include distortion in the taxonomy of privacy because of its significant similarity to other privacy disruptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningA space apart from others has enabled people to develop artistic, political, and religious ideas that have had lasting influence and value when later introduced into the public sphere.
“Moreover, a space apart from others has enabled people to develop artistic, political, and religious ideas that have had lasting influence and value when later introduced into the public sphere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDistortion, like disclosure, involves the spreading of information that affects the way society views a person.
“Distortion, like disclosure, involves the spreading of information that affects the way society views a person.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIntrusion into one's private sphere can be caused not only by physical incursion and proximity but also by gazes (surveillance) or questioning (interrogation).
“Intrusion into one's private sphere can be caused not only by physical incursion and proximity but also by gazes (surveillance) or questioning (interrogation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSolitude enables people to rest from the pressures of living in public and performing public roles.
“Solitude enables people to rest from the pressures of living in public and performing public roles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenInvasion harms differ from the harms of information collection, networking, and dissemination because they do not always involve information.
“Invasion harms differ from the harms of information collection, networking, and dissemination because they do not always involve information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe protection of a realm of solitude does not merely benefit the individual; it is built into society's structure for a social purpose.
“The protection of a realm of solitude does not merely benefit the individual; it is built into society's structure for a social purpose.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationBlackmail differs from disclosure, exposure, and breach of confidentiality in that it involves a threat of disclosure rather than an actual disclosure.
“Blackmail differs from disclosure, exposure, and breach of confidentiality in that it involves a threat of disclosure rather than an actual disclosure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFor the harm of increased accessibility, prior publicity is not dispositive; one must focus on the extent to which the information is made more accessible.
“For the harm of increased accessibility, however, prior publicity is not dispositive.One must focus on the extent to which the information is made more accessible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIntrusion often interferes with solitude, the state of being alone or able to retreat from the presence of others.
“In particular, intrusion often interferes with solitude, the state of being alone or able to retreat from the presence of others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTort law does not recognize a separate cause of action for exposure; the tort of public disclosure covers both disclosure and exposure.
“Tort law does not recognize a separate cause of action for exposure; the tort of public disclosure covers both disclosure and exposure.328”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [328]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe tort of appropriation was one of the first privacy torts to be recognized after Warren and Brandeis's article.
“The tort of appropriation was thus one of the first privacy torts to be recognized after Warren and Brandeis's article.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIncreased accessibility to personal information has many benefits, including enhancing openness and enabling people to locate information more easily.
“Increased accessibility to personal information has many benefits.It enhances openness, allowing people to locate information that they are seeking more easily.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe tort of appropriation has currently lost its way, as courts and commentators have not been able to adequately explain the injury that is redressed by the tort.
“The tort of appropriation has currently lost its way, as courts and commentators have not been able to adequately explain the injury that is redressed by the tort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe crime of blackmail prevents the use of disclosure, exposure, or breach of confidentiality as a means for exercising power over another person.
“The crime of blackmail thus prevents the use of disclosure, exposure, or breach of confidentiality as a means for exercising power over another person.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIntrusion is related to disclosure, as disclosure is often made possible by intrusive information gathering activities.
“Intrusion is related to disclosure, as disclosure is often made possible by intrusive information gathering activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningMany administrative bodies charged with examining the issue have hesitated because of the increased accessibility the Internet will bring.
“But many administrative bodies charged with examining the issue have hesitated because of the increased accessibility the Internet will bring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningExposure involves people unwillingly placed in transgression of norms; victims are not viewed as blameworthy, and there is little social value in their suffering.
“However, exposure involves people unwillingly placed in transgression of these norms.We do not view the victims as blameworthy, and there is little social value in their suffering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncreased accessibility does not involve a direct disclosure; secret information is not disclosed; rather, information already available to the public is made easier to access.
“Increased accessibility does not involve a direct disclosure.Secret information is not disclosed.Rather, information that is already available to the public is made easier to access.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn McNamara, the harm is more appropriately classified as exposure, and had the court conceptualized it as exposure, the public place would have been much less relevant.
“The harm in this case, however, is more appropriately classified as one of exposure.Had the court conceptualized the disruption as one of exposure, the fact that it occurred in a public place would have been much less relevant to the analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenPlacing court records online has given rise to an extensive debate over privacy.
“Nevertheless, placing them online has given rise to an extensive debate over privacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationBlackmail involves coercing an individual by threatening to expose her personal secrets if she does not accede to the demands of the blackmailer, which often involve paying hush money.
“Blackmail involves coercing an individual by threatening to expose her personal secrets if she does not accede to the demands of the blackmailer, which often involve paying hush money.358”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [358]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCriminal codes classify blackmail as a form of extortion, which involves the use of fear or threats to force someone to submit to another's will.
“Indeed, criminal codes classify blackmail as a form of extortion, which involves the use of fear or threats to force someone to submit to another's will.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CAL.PENAL CODE § 518
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe threat of disclosure is so profoundly disempowering that society still wants to protect against it.
“But the threat of disclosure is so profoundly disempowering that society still wants to protect against it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe purpose of restricting blackmail is not to limit disclosure but to prevent the use of the threat of disclosure as a tool for exerting power and dominion over others.
“The purpose of restricting blackmail is not to limit disclosure but to prevent the use of the threat of disclosure as a tool for exerting power and dominion over others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenOne's reputation is the product of the judgment of other people in society.
“Although it is true that people work very hard to build their reputations, one's reputation is the product of the judgment of other people in society.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCourts generally find no privacy interest if information is in the public domain, if people are monitored in public, if information is gathered in a public place, if no intimate or embarrassing details are revealed, or if no new data is collected about a person.
“courts generally find no privacy interest if information is in the public domain, if people are monitored in public, if information is gathered in a public place, if no intimate or embarrassing details are revealed, or if no new data is collected about a person.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Court extended the reasoning in Griswold to the use of contraceptives by unmarried persons as well.
“In Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Court extended the reasoning in Griswold to the use of contraceptives by unmarried persons as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [444]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDecisional interference and exposure have been judicially recognized to affect the same aspects of the self-health, the body, sex, and so on.
“Decisional interference and exposure have been judicially recognized to affect the same aspects of the self-health, the body, sex, and so on.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDecisional interference does not apply to all decisions, but only to a subset of decisions; this aspect resembles exposure in its focus on those aspects of life which are socially considered to be the most private.
“Decisional interference, therefore, does not apply to all decisions, but only to a subset of decisions; this aspect of decisional interference resembles exposure in its focus on those aspects of life which are socially considered to be the most private.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningPrivacy problems are caused not by technology alone, but primarily through activities of people, businesses, and the government.
“Privacy problems, however, are caused not by technology alone, but primarily through activities of people, businesses, and the government.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningModern privacy problems emerge not just from disclosing deep secrets, but from making obscure information more accessible (increased accessibility) or from consistent observation or eavesdropping (surveillance).
“Modern privacy problems emerge not just from disclosing deep secrets, but from making obscure information more accessible (increased accessibility) or from consistent observation or eavesdropping (surveillance).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAppropriation is understood primarily as a harm to property interests, and its dignitary dimensions are thus frequently ignored by courts.
“Appropriation is understood primarily as a harm to property interests, and its dignitary dimensions are thus frequently ignored by courts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Lawrence Court noted that laws restricting consensual private sexual behavior often give rise to blackmail.
“The Lawrence Court noted that in 1955, when crafting the Model Penal Code, the American Law Institute recommended against criminalizing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [476]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [477]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn intrusion analyses, courts often fail to recognize harm when people are intruded upon in public places, yet the nature of the harm is not limited solely to private places.
“In intrusion analyses, courts often fail to recognize harm when people are intruded upon in public places, yet the nature of the harm is not limited solely to private places.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDecisional interference resembles insecurity, secondary use, and exclusion, in that all three of these information-processing harms can have a chilling effect on a person's decisions regarding her health and body.
“Decisional interference also resembles insecurity, secondary use, and exclusion, in that all three of these information-processing harms can have a chilling effect on a person's decisions regarding her health and body.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough all of the privacy harms identified in the taxonomy are related in some way, they are not all related in the same way; there is no common denominator that links them all.
“Although all of the privacy harms I identify in the taxonomy are related in some way, they are not all related in the same way-there is no common denominator that links them all.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningDecisional interference bears a similarity to the harm of intrusion as both involve invasions into realms where we believe people should be free from the incursions of others.
“Decisional interference bears a similarity to the harm of intrusion as both involve invasions into realms where we believe people should be free from the incursions of others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenDue to conceptual confusion, courts and legislatures often fail to recognize privacy problems, and thus no balancing ever takes place.
“Unfortunately, due to conceptual confusion, courts and legislatures often fail to recognize privacy problems, and thus no balancing ever takes place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningOften, technology is involved in various privacy problems, as it facilitates the gathering, processing, and dissemination of information.
“Often, technology is involved in various privacy problems, as it facilitates the gathering, processing, and dissemination of information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Stanley v. Georgia, the Court concluded that the Constitution protects the right to receive information and ideas regardless of their social worth.
“the Court concluded that”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [463]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe concept of seclusion is relative; the mere fact that a person can be seen by someone does not automatically mean that he or she can legally be forced to be subject to being seen by everyone.
“The mere fact that a person can be seen by someone does not automatically mean that he or she can legally be forced to be subject to being seen by everyone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [440]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDecisional interference also bears an indirect resemblance to blackmail, in that laws restricting consensual private sexual behavior often give rise to blackmail.
“Decisional interference also bears an indirect resemblance to blackmail, in that laws restricting consensual private sexual behavior often give rise to blackmail.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe taxonomy demonstrates that privacy disruptions are different from one another and yet share important similarities.
“The taxonomy demonstrates that privacy disruptions are different from one another and yet share important similarities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Whalen v. Roe, the Court explained that the constitutionally protected zone of privacy extends not only to the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions but also to the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.
“the Court explained in Whalen v. Roe that the constitutionally protected”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [451]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCourts and legislatures respond well to more traditional privacy problems, such as intrusions that are physical in nature, disclosures of deep secrets, or distortion.
“Courts and legislatures respond well to more traditional privacy problems, such as intrusions that are physical in nature, disclosures of deep secrets, or distortion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe essence of the identification problem is being linked to a stream of data, not only a name.
“the essence of the problem is being linked to a stream of data, not only a name.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSome of the privacy problems we face today are different in nature and do not track traditional conceptions of privacy.
“some of the privacy problems we face today are different in nature, and do not track traditional conceptions of privacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWith the taxonomy, the paper demonstrates that privacy-affecting activities are not without cost and have certain nontrivial effects on people's lives and well-being.
“With the taxonomy, I have attempted to demonstrate that these activities are not without cost, that they have certain nontrivial effects on people's lives and well-being.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe constitutional right to information privacy, although not developed further by the Supreme Court, has been recognized by most federal circuit courts.
“This gave rise to the constitutional right to information privacy, which, although not developed further by the Supreme Court, has been recognized by most federal circuit courts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [452]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPrivacy violations are a group of related harms, each of which has received at least some recognition in the law.
“Privacy violations are a group of related harms, each of which has received at least some recognition in the law.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenTort law readily recognizes and redresses breach of confidentiality, yet Fourth Amendment law ignores it as a harm.
“tort law readily recognizes and redresses breach of confidentiality, yet Fourth Amendment law ignores it as a harm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Griswold v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution prohibited the government from banning the use of contraceptives by married couples.
“In 1965, in Griswold v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution prohibited the government from banning the use of contraceptives by married couples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [441]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen analyzing surveillance issues, courts focus on whether the surveillance occurs in public or in private, even though problems and harms can emerge in all settings.
“when analyzing surveillance issues, courts focus on whether the surveillance occurs in public or in private, even though problems and harms can emerge in all settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe taxonomy lays down a framework to understand the range of privacy problems, the similarities and differences among them, the relationships among them, and what it is that makes them problematic.
“The taxonomy lays down a framework to understand the range of privacy problems, the similarities and differences among them, the relationships among them, and what it is that makes them problematic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningInsecurity remains a problem even where there has been no actual disclosure or leakage of embarrassing details.
“insecurity remains a problem, even where there has been no actual disclosure or leakage of embarrassing details.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Meaningful generalizations can be made about potentially harmful or problematic activities.
“about which I believe meaningful generalizations can be made.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The law can serve as a source for determining what privacy violations society recognizes.
“I will frequently use the law as a source for determining what privacy violations society recognizes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The question of which matters and activities are private is too culturally variable and contextual to be the focus of the taxonomy.
“Since the question of which matters and activities are private is too culturally variable and contextual, this taxonomy focuses on potentially harmful or problematic activities”
The paper relies on this without support.
The taxonomy can be useful for the law even though it limits its focus to activities that harm or cause problems for private matters or activities.
“Despite the fact that the taxonomy limits its focus to the activities that harm or cause problems for private matters or activities, I believe that the taxonomy serves as a useful way for the law to approach and comprehend privacy problems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Social control can be beneficial and every society must exercise a sizeable degree of social control.
“since social control can be beneficial and every society must exercise a sizeable degree of social control.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People expect certain limits on what is known about them and on what others will find out.
“People expect certain limits on what is known about them and on what others will find out.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People give out bits of information in different settings, only revealing a small part of themselves in each context.
“People give out bits of information in different settings, only revealing a small part of themselves in each context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People selectively spread around small pieces of data throughout most of their daily activities, and they have the expectation that in each disclosure, they are revealing relatively little about themselves.
“Indeed, people selectively spread around small pieces of data throughout most of their daily activities, and they have the expectation that in each disclosure, they are revealing relatively little about themselves.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People have expectations about how the data they give out will be used.
“Secondary uses thwart people's expectations about how the data they give out will be used.”
The paper relies on this without support.
People often do not read or understand privacy policies.
“But even with privacy policies stating that information might be used in secondary ways, people often do not read or understand these policies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the Information Age, much of what we do is recorded by third parties.
“In the Information Age, much of what we do is recorded by third parties.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Personal information is increasingly used to make important decisions about our lives.
“But in a world where personal information is increasingly used to make important decisions about our lives, powerlessness in this arena can be significantly troublesome.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decisional interference compromises individuals' autonomy to make decisions and take responsibility for those decisions.
“Decisional interference compromises individuals' autonomy to make decisions and take responsibility for those decisions.”
From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Solove, 2006
The Decisional Interference section describes unwanted government intrusion into decisions about personal life, and the Additional information passage links such interference to a harm to autonomy and liberty (page not provided). The copy does not say that it compromises individuals’ ability to take responsibility for their decisions; it also limits the concept to certain private decisions, not decisions generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe result of both distortion and disclosure is embarrassment, stigma, and reputational harm.
“The result of both distortion and disclosure is embarrassment, stigma, and reputational harm.”
From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Solove, 2006
In “7. Distortion,” Solove says both distortion and disclosure can result in embarrassment, stigma, and reputational harm. The citing sentence presents those harms as the result rather than possible results, making the claim more definite than the source. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSolove (2006) warns that we need to consider the scope and implications of coercion when nudging individuals to share information.
“There is, however, the warning issued by Solove (2006) (Table 1) that we need to consider the scope and implications of coercion when nudging individuals to share information.”
From Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration (2016) · cites this paper as Solove, 2006
These forms of privacy can be threatened and breached through practices normally understood as unacceptable, each producing a different form of harm.
“As Solove [37] details, these forms of privacy can be threatened and breached through a number of what are normally understood as unacceptable practices, each of which produces a different form of harm (table 1).”
From The ethics of smart cities and urban science (2016) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Stanley is cited under two different reporter volumes
MinorThe paper cites the same Stanley decision at page 564 of both volume 394 and volume 395 of U.S. Reports. At least one reporter volume is wrong.
“467 Stanley, 395 U.S. at 564”
“463 Stanley, 394 U.S. at 564.”
Two different acts are assigned the same public-law number
MinorThe paper assigns Pub. L. No. 90-351 to both the Federal Communications Act of 1934 and the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. Those distinct acts cannot both have that public-law number.
“58 See Federal Communications Act of 1934, Pub.L. No. 90-351, § 2520, 48 Stat.1103 (codified as amended at 47 U.S.C. § 605 (2000)).”
“60 Pub.L. No. 90-351, ch.119, 82 Stat.212 (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. § § 2510-2522 (2000)).”
Cites
Brown, J. (1993) · doi:10.2307/3312579 · Cited by 12
Truth and consequences: the force of blackmail's central case
Gordon, W. J. (1993) · doi:10.2307/3312573 · Cited by 9
Flagged first, then by citations
24 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- [1]1. L. REV. 1609, 1611 (1999) ("At present, however, no successful standards, legal or otherwise, exist for limiting the collection and utilization of personal data in cyberspace."). 181 SOLOVE, THE DIGITAL PERSON, supra note 40, at 1. 182 Clarke, Information Systems, supra note 169, at 20. 183
- [2]2. As Richard Sobel observes, "[i]dentity systems and documents have a long history of uses and abuses for social control and discrimination." Richard Sobel, The Degradation of Political Identity Under a National Identification System, 8 B.U. J. SCI. & TECH. L. 37, 48 (2002). Indeed, one of the primary reasons that governments created passports and identity cards was to restrict movement, alter patterns of migration, and control the movements of poor people and others viewed as undesirable. Marc Garcelon, Colonizing the Subject: The Gene- alogy and Legacy of the Soviet Internal Passport, in DOCUMENTING INDIVIDUAL IDENTITY 83, 86 (Jane Caplan & John Torpey eds., 2001). 184 Sobel, supra note 183, at 49. 185 Anonymous speech has a long history as an important mode of expression. Between 1789 and 1809, numerous Presidents and Congressmen published anonymous political writ- ings. SMITH, supra note 111, at 41. Ben Franklin used over forty pen names during his life. Id. at 43. Indeed, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay published the Federalist Papers using the pseudonym "Publius." McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n, 514 U.S. 334, 343 n.6 (1995). The Anti-Federalists also used pseudonyms. Id. 186 As Gary Marx notes, anonymity can "facilitate the flow of information and commu- nication on public issues" and "encourage experimentation and risk taking without facing large consequences, risk of failure, or embarrassment since one's identity is protected." Gary 206
- [9]9. U.S.C. § 1030 (2000 & Supp. 2002). 212 See Daniel J. Solove, The New Vulnerability: Data Security and Personal Informa- tion, in SECURING PRIVACY IN THE INTERNET AGE 11-12 (Margaret Jane Radin et al. eds., forthcoming 2006), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=583483 (arguing that the law fails to adequately guard sensitive information, and that a reconceptualization of the legal duties in- formation-keepers owe their customers is necessary). 213 See, e.g., Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. § 2707(c) (2000) (setting a minimum $1000 fine per violation); Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988,
- [11]11. See Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614, 616 (2004) (construing
- [12]12. U.S.C. § 552a(g)(4) (2000)). 214 536 U.S. 822, 826 (2002). 215 Id. at 827, 838. 224
- [22]22. U.S.C. § § 3401-3421 (2000)). 262 Id. at 438. 263 Id. at 438-39. 264 Id. at 442. 265 Id. at 443. 266 Id. at 442. 267 442 U.S. 735, 743 (1979). 268 SOLOVE, THE DIGITAL PERSON, supra note 40, at 201. 269 See id. at 202-09 (discussing the consequences of applying outdated privacy protec- tion schemes to modern times). 270 Id. at 201-02. 369
- [23]23. N.E. 442, 442 (N.Y. 1902). 370 Id. 371 Id. Roberson became so ill that she had to see a physician. Id. 372 Id. at 442-43. 373 Id. at 447-48 (applying Warren & Brandeis, supra note 21). 374 Editorial, The Right of Privacy, N.Y. TIMES, Aug. 23, 1902, at 8, reprinted in Denis O'Brien, The Right of Privacy, 2 COLUM. L. REV. 437, 438 (1902). 375 Comment, An Actionable Right to Privacy?: Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co., 12 YALE L.J. 35, 36 (1902). 376 O'Brien, supra note 374, at 437. 377 See, e.g., Irwin R. Kramer, The Birth of Privacy Law: A Century Since Warren and Brandeis, 39 CATH. U. L. REV. 703, 717 (1990) (noting that the statutes "made it both a tort and a misdemeanor . . . to use another's name, portrait, or picture for commercial purposes without the subject's consent"). 378
- [26]26. HARV. L. REV. 1892, 1894 (1981) (dating the first mention to a report written in 1499); see also Semayne's Case, 77 Eng. Rep. 194, 195 (
- [34]34. U.S. 113, 153 (1973).
- [40]40. Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119, 1132 (5th Cir. 1978) ("There is another strand to the right to privacy properly called the right to confidentiality."). 457 Id. at 252. 458 Id. at 251; Warren & Brandeis, supra note 21, at 195. 459 Union Pacific, 141 U.S. at 251. 460 394 U.S. 557 (1969). 461 410 U.S. 113, 152 (1973). 462 405 U.S. 438, 453 (1972). 463 Stanley, 394 U.S. at 564. 464 Id. 465 Id. 466 277
- [41]41. U.S. 438 (1928). 467 Stanley, 395 U.S. at 564 (quoting Olmstead, 277 U.S. at 478 (Brandeis, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted)). 468 See Warren & Brandeis, supra note 21, at 195. the Court's reasoning suggests, necessitates governmental intrusion into one's home. The Court noted that people have "the right to be free from state inquiry into the contents of [their] library." 469 Linking decisional inter- ference with intrusion, it stressed that "a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch." 470 Further capturing the relationship between the two catego- ries, Robert Post contends that the intrusion tort protects "territories of the self," which are critical to remaining "an independent and autonomous per- son." 471 In Lawrence v. Texas, the Court further demonstrated the frequent over- lap between decisional interference and intrusion in striking down a law that prohibited consensual homosexual sodomy. 472 The Court reasoned that "adults may choose to enter upon this relationship in the confines of their homes and their own private lives and still retain their dignity as free per- sons." 473 The statute was unconstitutional because of "its [unjustified] in- trusion into the personal and private life of the individual." 474 Moreover, the Court stated: Liberty protects the person from unwarranted government intrusions into a dwelling or other private places. In our tradition the State is not omnipresent in the home. And there are other spheres of our lives and existence, outside the home, where the State should not be a dominant presence. Freedom ex- tends beyond spatial bounds. 475 The Court thus linked decisional interference to intrusion. Decisional interference also bears an indirect resemblance to blackmail, in that laws restricting consensual private sexual behavior often give rise to blackmail. The Lawrence Court noted that in 1955, when crafting the Model Penal Code, the American Law Institute recommended against criminalizing "consensual sexual relations conducted in private" 476 in part because "the statutes regulated private conduct not harmful to others," and because "the laws were arbitrarily enforced and thus invited the danger of blackmail." 477 Indeed, as Angus McLaren recounts, blackmail historically 469 Stanley, 395 U.S. at 565. 470 Id. 471 Post, supra note 44, at 973. 472 539 U.S. 558, 578 (2003). 473 Id. at 567. 474 Id. at 578. 475 Id. at 562. 476 Id. at 572 (quoting MODEL PENAL CODE § 213.2 cmt. 2 (1980)) 477 Id. (citing MODEL PENAL CODE § 207.5 cmt. at 277-78 (Tentative Draft No. 4, 1955)). For an interesting discussion of Lawrence and public versus private places, see Lior
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Information Privacy Research: an Interdisciplinary Review1
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409970 · Cited by 2,013 · see citing works
“And yet, it is widely recognized that, as a concept, privacy “is in disarray [and n]obody can articulate what it means” (Solove 2006, p. 477).”
BackgroundPrivacy and human behavior in the age of information
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1465 · Cited by 1,879 · see citing works
Privacy in the Digital Age: a Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1
Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409971 · Cited by 1,339 · see citing works
Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., & Wagman, L. (2016) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.54.2.442 · Cited by 1,283 · see citing works
Kokolakis, S. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002 · Cited by 1,229 · see citing works
The Effect of Online Privacy Information on Purchasing Behavior: An Experimental Study
Tsai, J., Egelman, S., Cranor, L. F., & Acquisti, A. (2010) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1090.0260 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Data Privacy: Effects on Customer and Firm Performance
Martin, K. D., Borah, A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2017) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0497 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances
Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J., & Hart, P. (2011) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00281 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
“Toward this end, Solove (2006) developed a taxonomy of information practices and activities, which maps out various types of problems and harms that constitute privacy violations.”
Privacy in the Internet of Things: threats and challenges
Ziegeldorf, J. H., Morchon, O. G., & Wehrle, K. (2013) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1002/sec.795 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Corporate digital responsibility
Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, M., & Wirtz, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
“Furthermore, data privacy is a great risk in digitized settings (Solove, 2005); recent data breaches involving large corporations (e.”
BackgroundTaking account of privacy when designing cloud computing services
Pearson, S. (2009) · doi:10.1109/cloud.2009.5071532 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Acquisti, A., John, L. K., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2013) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/671754 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Deng, M., Wuyts, K., Scandariato, R., Preneel, B., & Joosen, W. (2010) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-010-0115-7 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Misplaced Confidences: Privacy and the Control Paradox
Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2013) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550612455931 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights
Lupton, D. A., & Williamson, B. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816686328 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Dinev, T., Xu, H., Smith, J., & Hart, P. (2012) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.23 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
“…of privacy affects many aspects of the society – the vagueness of the concept fails to guide adjudication and lawmaking (Bennett, 1992; Solove, 2006), as well as formation of government and organizational management policies and practices regarding the privacy and security of…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe ethics of smart cities and urban science
Kitchin, R. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0115 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Lin (2012) · doi:10.1145/2370216.2370290 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy
Erlich, Y., & Narayanan, A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3723 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Privacy-Preserving Solutions for Blockchain: Review and Challenges
Bernal Bernabe, J., Canovas, J. L., Hernandez-Ramos, J. L., Torres Moreno, R., & Skarmeta, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2950872 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
State of the Information Privacy Literature: Where Are We Now and Where Should We Go?
Pavlou (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409969 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Spiekermann, S., & Cranor, L. F. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2008.88 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Sutanto, J., Palme, E., Tan, C.-H., & Phang, C. W. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.4.07 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Munn, L. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00209-w · Cited by 352 · see citing works
“Even the most influential conceptions of privacy characterize it as a big tent, housing a diverse group of interests and a diverse array of meanings [75].”
BackgroundNastjuk, I., Herrenkind, B., Marrone, M., Brendel, B., & Kolbe, L. M. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120319 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Xu, H., Teo, H., Tan, B. C. Y., & Agarwal, R. (2012) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0416 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
What Makes a Dark Pattern... Dark?
Mathur, A., Kshirsagar, M., & Mayer, J. R. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445610 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Security and Privacy in Device-to-Device (D2D) Communication: A Review
Haus, M., Waqas, M. M., Ding, A. Y., Li, Y., Tarkoma, S., & Ott, J. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2649687 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Inherent Tradeoffs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603197 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Hoepman, J.-H. (2014) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55415-5_38 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions
Politou, E., Alepis, E., & Patsakis, C. (2018) · Journal of Cybersecurity · doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyy001 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
EXAMINING THE FORMATION OF INDIVIDUAL 'S PRIVACY CONCERNS : TOWARD AN INTEGRATIVE VIEW
Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, H. J., & Hart, P. (2008) · Cited by 313 · see citing works
How Ethics Can Enhance Organizational Privacy: Lessons from the ChoicePoint and TJX Data Breaches1
Culnan, M. J., & Williams, C. C. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650322 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Secrets and Likes: The Drive for Privacy and the Difficulty of Achieving It in the Digital Age
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1191 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
“Surveys, field studies, and experiments—as well as common sense —show that consumers engage in privacy-regulating behaviors continually and in both online and offline scenarios, crossing the many diverse dimensions and definitions of privacy (Solove, 2005), from spatial to informational.”
BackgroundPrivacy, Security and Trust in Cloud Computing
Pearson, S. (2012) · Computer communications and networks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4189-1_1 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Privacy in the Smart City—Applications, Technologies, Challenges, and Solutions
Eckhoff, D., & Wagner, I. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2748998 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Making Transparency Transparent: The Evolution of Observation in Management Theory
Bernstein, E. S. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0076 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Bibri, S. E. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0182-7 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
“Source: compiled by Kitchin [81] from Solove [118]”
BackgroundMethodThe challenges of personal data markets and privacy
Spiekermann, S., Acquisti, A., Böhme, R., & Hui, K.-L. (2015) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-015-0191-0 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Putting AI ethics to work: are the tools fit for purpose?
Ayling, J., & Chapman, A. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00084-x · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Miltgen, C. L., & Peyrat‐Guillard, D. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.17 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Understanding Situational Online Information Disclosure as a Privacy Calculus
Li, H., Sarathy, R., & Xu, H. (2010) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2010.11645450 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
“a determinant of privacy-related behaviors within the IS field, legal and social scholars have noted recently that it is important to conceptually and operationally draw a distinction between general concerns for privacy and situation specific concerns [4, 28, 40].”
Student privacy in learning analytics: An information ethics perspective
Rubel, A., & Jones, K. M. L. (2014) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2016.1130502 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Small data in the era of big data
Kitchin, R., & Lauriault, T. P. (2014) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9601-7 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
The hidden assumptions behind counterfactual explanations and principal reasons
Barocas, S., Selbst, A., & Raghavan, M. (2019) · FAT* · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372830 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb
Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Privacy–Enhancing Face Biometrics: A Comprehensive Survey
Meden, B., Rot, P., Terhörst, P., Damer, N., Kuijper, A., Scheirer, W. J., Ross, A. A., Peer, P., & Štruc, V. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2021.3096024 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
(2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Blurred Boundaries: Social Media Privacy and the Twenty‐First‐Century Employee
Abril, P. S., Levin, A., & Riego, A. D. (2012) · American Business Law Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1744-1714.2011.01127.x · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Does privacy assurance on social commerce sites matter to millennials?
Wang, Y., & Herrando, C. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.016 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Understanding Privacy Online: Development of a Social Contract Approach to Privacy
Martin, K. E. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2565-9 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Accountability as a Way Forward for Privacy Protection in the Cloud
Pearson, S., & Charlesworth, A. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10665-1_12 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Smart Home Personal Assistants
Edu, J., Such, J. M., & Suárez‐Tangil, G. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3412383 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
“social control efforts [43]. 3.3 Profiling Beyond authorization, i.e., deciding who has access to what data, there is also the problem of data inference — traditionally known as information processing [44]. Data inference has a particularly dangerous incarnation in SPA in the form of profiling. Profiling identifies, infer…”
BackgroundInfluentialContact tracing apps and values dilemmas: A privacy paradox in a neo-liberal world
Rowe, F. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102178 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
“…personal data?) but to truly address both a) values dilemmas including by providing some philosophical background with a critical theoretical stance when possible (Introna & Pouloudi, 1999) and b) risks and negative consequences related to the design (e.g. Solove, 2006; Thornley et al., 2011).”
A systematic methodology for privacy impact assessments: a design science approach
Oetzel, M. C., & Spiekermann, S. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.18 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Measuring mobile users' concerns for information privacy
Xu, H., Gupta, S., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2012) · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Opening up Smart Cities: Citizen-Centric Challenges and Opportunities from GIScience
Degbelo, A., Granell, C., Trilles, S., Bhattacharya, D., Casteleyn, S., & Kray, C. (2016) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi5020016 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Biomedical data privacy: problems, perspectives, and recent advances
Malin, B., Emam, K. E., & O’Keefe, C. M. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001509 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?
Brown, H., Lee, K., Mireshghallah, F., Shokri, R., & Tramèr, F. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3534642 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“Under this framework, privacy is considered violated when information is shared outside an acceptable context, which also allows some concept of different degrees of privacy violation[86].”
BackgroundThe Chilling Effects of Digital Dataveillance: A Theoretical Model and an Empirical Research Agenda
Büchi, M., Festic, N., & Latzer, M. (2022) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211065368 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
“After the September 11 attack, the concept resurged and was applied to counter-terrorism surveillance: Solove (2006, 2007) explicitly introduced surveillance as an inhibitor of people ’ s legitimate activities and acknowledged the indirect nature of the risk.”
BackgroundMobile users’ information privacy concerns and the role of app permission requests
Degirmenci, K. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.010 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Essén, A. (2008) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.005 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Bibri, S. E., & Allam, Z. (2022) · Computational Urban Science · doi:10.1007/s43762-022-00050-1 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Student Vulnerability, Agency and Learning Analytics: An Exploration
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2016) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2016.31.10 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Jones, K. M. L., Asher, A., Goben, A. H., Perry, M. R., Salo, D., Briney, K. A., & Robertshaw, M. B. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24358 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Privacy, Social Network Sites, and Social Relations
Houghton, D., & Joinson, A. (2010) · Journal of Technology in Human Services · doi:10.1080/15228831003770775 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
The policy knot: re-integrating policy, practice and design in cscw studies of social computing
Jackson, S. J., Gillespie, T., & Payette, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing · doi:10.1145/2531602.2531674 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework
Rana, M. M., Siddiqee, M. S., Sakib, M. N., & Ahamed, M. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Clayton, E. W., Halverson, C. M. E., Sathe, N. A., & Malin, B. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204417 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy
Wan, Z., Hazel, J. W., Clayton, E. W., Vorobeychik, Y., Kantarcıoğlu, M., & Malin, B. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00455-y · Cited by 141 · see citing works
The role of privacy policy on consumers’ perceived privacy
Chang, Y., Wong, S. F., Libaque-Sáenz, C. F., & Lee, H. (2018) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.002 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Making Decisions about Privacy
Knijnenburg, B. P., & Kobsa, A. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2499670 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Privacy in Internet of Things: From Principles to Technologies
Li, C., & Palanisamy, B. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2864168 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Privacy Concerns and Behaviors of People with Visual Impairments
Ahmed, T., Hoyle, R., Connelly, K., Crandall, D., & Kapadia, A. C. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702334 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Achieving big data privacy in education
Reidenberg, J. R., & Schaub, F. (2018) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/1477878518805308 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“Daniel Solove’s privacy taxonomy maps various types of harms according to their relationship to information collection, information processing, information dissemination, and invasion (Solove, 2006).”
BackgroundThe Economics of Personal Data and the Economics of Privacy
Acquisti, A. (2018) · doi:10.1184/r1/6471989.v1 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Liginlal, D., Sim, I., & Khansa, L. (2008) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2008.11.003 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Internet surveillance, regulation, and chilling effects online: a comparative case study
Penney, J. W. (2017) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2017.2.692 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
“Consistent with Schauer (1978) and Solove (2006; 2007) this prediction speaks to potential chilling effects on legal activities online, as indicated by respondents being less willing to engage in such activities, as well as evidence of the stultification thesis, about how chilling effects may also…”
BackgroundInfluentialChen, Q., Feng, Y., Liu, L., & Tian, X. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.001 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
“, when a marketer collects a consumer profile) may make users feel uncomfortable (Daniel, 2006).”
BackgroundChoi, B. C. F., Jiang, Z. J., Xiao, B. S., & Kim, S. S. (2015) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0602 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“Furthermore, whereas perceived relationship bonding impedes both transactional avoidance and interpersonal avoidance, it leads to approach behavior.”
BackgroundSocial Injustice in Surveillance Capitalism
Cinnamon, J. (2017) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v15i5.6433 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Mann, S. P., Savulescu, J., & Sahakian, B. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0130 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Privacy Engineering: Shaping an Emerging Field of Research and Practice
Gürses, S. F., & Álamo, J. M. D. (2016) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2016.37 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Respecting Context to Protect Privacy: Why Meaning Matters
Nissenbaum, H. F. (2015) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9674-9 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
The regulation of civilian drones' impacts on behavioural privacy
Clarke, R. (2014) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2014.03.005 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
The Privacy Implications of Cyber Security Systems
Toch, E., Bettini, C., Shmueli, E., Radaelli, L., Lanzi, A., Riboni, D., & Lepri, B. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3172869 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“For a threat to materialize, an adversary should have the ability to associate a user’s identity with data that is considered private by the individual (Solove 2006).”
BackgroundPost-Quantum Era Privacy Protection for Intelligent Infrastructures
Malina, L., Dzurenda, P., Ricci, S., Hajny, J., Srivastava, G., Matulevicius, R., Affia, A.-A. O., Laurent, M., Sultan, N. H., & Tang, Q. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3062201 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Privacy-Preserving Learning Analytics: Challenges and Techniques
Gürsoy, M. E., İnan, A., Nergiz, M. E., & Saygın, Y. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2016.2607747 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Gurari, D., Li, Q., Lin, C., Zhao, Y., Guo, A., Stangl, A. J., & Bigham, J. P. (2019) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00103 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Privacy and Artificial Intelligence
Curzon, J., Kosa, T. A., Akalu, R., & El‐Khatib, K. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2021.3088084 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
The chilling effects of algorithmic profiling: Mapping the issues
Büchi, M., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., Tamò-Larrieux, A., Velidi, S., & Viljoen, S. (2020) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105367 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“2 1 Note that Penney’s findings are consistent with Solove’s approach, which discusses how these chilling effects are indicative of a broader “surveillance related pollution” – the larger self-censorship and conformity that is a result of mass surveillance ( Solove, 2006 ; Penney, 2017 ).”
BackgroundSpatial big data and anxieties of control
Leszczynski, A. (2015) · Environment and Planning D Society and Space · doi:10.1177/0263775815595814 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Towards a value theory for personal data
Spiekermann, S., & Korunovska, J. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2016.4 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Xia, H., Yao, Y., & Huang, Y. K. (2016) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.1515/popets-2016-0022 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
A risk to a right? Beyond data protection risk assessments
van Dijk, N., Gellert, R., & Rommetveit, K. (2016) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2015.12.017 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Beyond self-disclosure: Disclosure of information about others in social network sites
Koohikamali, M., Peak, D. A., & Prybutok, V. R. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.012 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Martin, K. E. (2014) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.14.139 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities
Frost, J. H., Vermeulen, I., & Beekers, N. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2684 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“Legal scholars, noting an oversimplified use of the word “privacy” from the individual’s perspective, have called for a more nuanced view—one that acknowledges the variety of types of invasions to privacy and examines the significance of privacy within a particular situation [33].”
BackgroundGovernment Surveillance, Privacy, and Legitimacy
Königs, P. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00503-9 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Understanding Privacy-Related Questions on Stack Overflow
Tahaei, M., Vaniea, K. E., & Saphra, N. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376768 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“Daniel J. Solove describes privacy as “too complicated a concept to be boiled down to a single essence” [62, p.485], so he instead made a taxonomy of activities that potentially can be harmful to privacy: information collection (e.g. surveillance), information processing (e.g. identification),…”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Solove, D. J.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Solove, Daniel J.
- ORCID
- Solove, Daniel J.
- Venue
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 477
- ISSN
- 0041-9907 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1526916602
- Cited by
- 1,388
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 85 · 2025: 97 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 59
- FWCI
- 74.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review (publishedVersion)
- eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Penn Carey Law Legal Scholarship Repository (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- George Washington University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- privacy, privacy law, data privacy, Fourth Amendment, evidentiary privilege, privacy harms, privacy torts, constitutional right to privacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review