The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘They took our beads, it was a fair trade, get over it’: Settler colonial logics, racial hierarchies and material dominance in Canadian agriculture
Abstract
Canada is in a liminal space, with renewed struggles for and commitments to indigenous land and food sovereignty on one hand, and growing capital interest in land governance and agriculture on the other. While neoliberal capital increasingly accumulates land-based control, settler-farming communities still manage much of Canada’s arable land. This research draws on studies of settler colonialism, racial hierarchy and othering to connect the ideological with the material forces of settler colonialism and show how material dominance is maintained through colonial logics and racially ordered narratives. Through in-depth interviews, I investigate how white settler farmers perceive and construct two distinctly ‘othered’ groups: Indigenous peoples and migrant farmers and farm workers. Further, I show the disparate role of land and labour in constructing each group, and specifically, the cultural and material benefits of these constructions for land-based settler populations. At the same time, settler colonial structures and logics remain reciprocally coupled to political conditions. For instance, contemporary neoliberalism in Canadian agriculture modifies settler colonial structures to be sure. I argue, however, that political economic analyses of land and food production in Canada (such as corporate concentration, land grabbing and farm consolidation) ought to better integrate the systemic forces of settler colonialism that have conditioned land access in the first place. Of cours…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Racial domination is reproduced differently based on relations of inequality over time.
“it is important to note that “racial domination is reproduced differently based on relations of inequality over time” (Rotz 2017:159).”
From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Rotz 2017:159
Citations
Cites
Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native
Wolfe, P. (2006) · Journal of Genocide Research · doi:10.1080/14623520601056240 · Cited by 6,491
Transient servitude: migrant labour in Canada and the apartheid of citizenship
Walia, H. (2010) · Race & Class · doi:10.1177/0306396810371766 · Cited by 146
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- Akram-Lodhi, 2007, Land, markets and neoliberal enclosure: an agrarian political economy perspective, Third World Quart., 28, 1437, 10.1080/01436590701637326 · DOI
- Alcantara, 2008, To treaty or not to treaty? Aboriginal peoples and comprehensive land claims negotiations in Canada, Publius, 38, 343, 10.1093/publius/pjm036 · DOI
- Alexander, Jeffrey C., 1992. Citizen and enemy as symbolic classification: on the polarizing discourse of civil society. In: Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, pp. 289–308.
- Alexander, 2000, Theorizing the good society: hermeneutic, normative and empirical discourses, Can. J. Sociol., 25, 271, 10.2307/3341644 · DOI
- Basok, 2013, Reproducing deportability: migrant agricultural workers in South-Western Ontario, J. Ethnic Migrat. Stud., 40, 1394, 10.1080/1369183X.2013.849566 · DOI
- Binford, 2009, From fields of power to fields of sweat: the dual process of constructing temporary migrant labour in Mexico and Canada, Third World Quart., 30, 503, 10.1080/01436590902742297 · DOI
- Brons, 2015, Othering, an analysis, Transcience, 6, 69
- Burnett, 2015, Settling the table: northern food subsidy programs and the (re)colonisation of indigenous bodies, Crit. Race Whiteness Stud., 11, 1
- Burton, 2004, Seeing through the ‘good farmer’s’ eyes: towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behaviour, Sociol. Ruralis, 44, 195, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x · DOI
- Cavanagh, 2013, Editors statement, Settler Colonial Stud., 3, 1, 10.1080/18380743.2013.768169 · DOI
- Connell, 1998, Masculinities and globalization, Men Masculinit., 1, 3, 10.1177/1097184X98001001001 · DOI
- Connell, 2001, Understanding men: gender sociology and the new international research on masculinities, Soc. Thought Res., 24, 13
- Desmarais, Annette Aurélie, Wittman, Hannah, 2014. Farmers, foodies and first nations: getting to food sovereignty in Canada. J. Peas. Stud. 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.876623. New Haven: Yale University. · DOI
- Dhamoon, 2015, A feminist approach to decolonizing anti-racism: rethinking transnationalism, intersectionality, and settler colonialism, Feral Femin., 4, 20
- DiAngelo, 2011, White fragility, Int. J. Crit. Pedag., 3, 54
- Friedmann, 1978, World market, state, and family farm: social bases of household production in the era of wage labor, Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist., 20, 545, 10.1017/S001041750001255X · DOI
- Friedmann, 2005, Feeding the empire, Social. Register, 124
- Goldberg, 2009, Racial comparisons, relational racisms: some thoughts on method, Ethnic Racial Stud., 32, 1271, 10.1080/01419870902999233 · DOI
- Grez, 2006, Justice for migrant farm workers: reflections on the importance of community organising, Migration, July/August, 23
- Guthman, 2008, Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California, Geoforum, 39, 1171, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.002 · DOI
- Guthman, 2012, Doing justice to bodies? Reflections on food justice, race, and biology, Antipode, 46, no
- Hall, Derek, 2013. Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession and the global land grab. Third World Quart. 34(9), 1582–1604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.843854. Routledge. · DOI
- Harris, 2004, How did colonialism dispossess? Comments from an edge of empire, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 94, 165, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401009.x · DOI
- Harvey, 2004, The ‘new’ imperialism: accumulation by dispossession, Social. Register, 40
- Holtslander, 2015, Losing our grip: 2015 update, National Farmers Union, 36
- Lawrence, 2005, Decolonizing antiracism, Soc. Justice, 32, 120
- Magnan, 2012, New avenues of farm corporatization in the prairie grains sector: farm family entrepreneurs and the case of one earth farms, Agric. Hum. Values, 29, 161, 10.1007/s10460-011-9327-9 · DOI
- McCrossan, 2015, Contaminating and collapsing indigenous space: judicial narratives of Canadian territoriality, Settler Colonial Stud., 5, 20, 10.1080/2201473X.2014.925609 · DOI
- Morgensen, 2011, The biopolitics of settler colonialism: right here, right now, Settler Colonial Stud., 1, 52, 10.1080/2201473X.2011.10648801 · DOI
- Nelson, 2014, A German on the prairies: max sering and settler colonialism in Canada, Settler Colonial Stud., 5, 1, 10.1080/2201473X.2014.899551 · DOI
- Peluso, 2011, New frontiers of land control: introduction, J. Peas. Stud., 38, 667, 10.1080/03066150.2011.607692 · DOI · Paper page
- Perry, 2012, Barely legal: racism and migrant farm labour in the context of Canadian multiculturalism, Citizsh. Stud., 16, 189, 10.1080/13621025.2012.667611 · DOI
- Pini, 2004, Managerial masculinities in the Australian sugar industry, Rural Soc., 14, 22, 10.5172/rsj.351.14.1.22 · DOI
- Preibisch, 2007, Local produce, foreign labor: labor mobility programs and global trade competitiveness in Canada, Rural Sociol., 72, 418, 10.1526/003601107781799308 · DOI
- Preibisch, 2010, Pick-your-own labor: migrant workers and flexibility in Canadian agriculture, Int. Migrat. Rev., 44, 404, 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00811.x · DOI
- Reaman, 1970, vol. 2
- Rossiter, 2005, Fantastic topographies: neo-liberal responses to aboriginal land claims in British Columbia, Can. Geogr., 49, 352, 10.1111/j.0008-3658.2005.00101.x · DOI
- Saldanha, 2006, Reontologising race: the machinic geography of phenotype, Environ. Plan. D: Soc. Space, 24, 9, 10.1068/d61j · DOI
- Saldanha, 2011, The concept of race, Geography, 96, 27, 10.1080/00167487.2011.12094306 · DOI
- Simpson, 2003, Toxic contamination undermining indigenous food systems and indigenous sovereignty, Pimatziwin: J. Indig. Commun. Health, 1, 130
- Smith, 2010, Indigeneity, settler colonialism, white supremacy, Glob. Dialogue, 12, 1
- Statistics Canada, 2011. 2011 Census of Agriculture. Ottawa. · DOI
- Steckley, Marylynn, 2016. Why ‘race’ matters in struggles for food sovereignty: experiences from Haiti. Geoforum 72, 26–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.03.009. Elsevier Ltd. · DOI
- Stock, 2014, Farmer autonomy and the farming self, J. Rural Stud., 36, 160, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.07.004 · DOI
- Sutherland, 2011, Good farmers, good neighbours? The role of cultural capital in social capital development in a Scottish farming community, Sociol. Ruralis, 51, 238, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00536.x · DOI
- Thobani, 2007, vol. 53
- Troughton, 1989, The role of marketing boards in the industrialization of the Canadian agricultural system, J. Rural Stud., 5, 367, 10.1016/0743-0167(89)90063-6 · DOI
- Tuck, 2012, Decolonization is not a metaphor, Decolonizat.: Indigeneity Educ. Soc., 1, 1
- Veracini, 2008, Settler collective, founding violence and disavowal: the settler colonial situation, J. Intercult. Stud., 29, 363, 10.1080/07256860802372246 · DOI
- Veracini, 2011, On settlerness, Borderlands, 10
- Wolfe, 2001, Land, labour and difference: elementary structures of race, Am. Hist. Rev., 106, 866, 10.2307/2692330 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rotz, S., Gravely, E., Mosby, I., Duncan, E., Finnis, E., Horgan, M., LeBlanc, J., Martin, R., Neufeld, H. T., Nixon, A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023 · Cited by 557
Self-citationKelvin, L., & Hodgetts, L. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.51270/44.1.1 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Rotz, S.
- Venue
- Geoforum
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 158-169
- ISSN
- 0016-7185
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Canadian Vanier Graduate Scholarship program
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review