Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘They took our beads, it was a fair trade, get over it’: Settler colonial logics, racial hierarchies and material dominance in Canadian agriculture

Rotz, Sarah·2017·Geoforum

Abstract

Canada is in a liminal space, with renewed struggles for and commitments to indigenous land and food sovereignty on one hand, and growing capital interest in land governance and agriculture on the other. While neoliberal capital increasingly accumulates land-based control, settler-farming communities still manage much of Canada’s arable land. This research draws on studies of settler colonialism, racial hierarchy and othering to connect the ideological with the material forces of settler colonialism and show how material dominance is maintained through colonial logics and racially ordered narratives. Through in-depth interviews, I investigate how white settler farmers perceive and construct two distinctly ‘othered’ groups: Indigenous peoples and migrant farmers and farm workers. Further, I show the disparate role of land and labour in constructing each group, and specifically, the cultural and material benefits of these constructions for land-based settler populations. At the same time, settler colonial structures and logics remain reciprocally coupled to political conditions. For instance, contemporary neoliberalism in Canadian agriculture modifies settler colonial structures to be sure. I argue, however, that political economic analyses of land and food production in Canada (such as corporate concentration, land grabbing and farm consolidation) ought to better integrate the systemic forces of settler colonialism that have conditioned land access in the first place. Of cours…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Racial domination is reproduced differently based on relations of inequality over time.

    “it is important to note that “racial domination is reproduced differently based on relations of inequality over time” (Rotz 2017:159).”

    From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Rotz 2017:159

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Akram-Lodhi, 2007, Land, markets and neoliberal enclosure: an agrarian political economy perspective, Third World Quart., 28, 1437, 10.1080/01436590701637326 · DOI
  2. Alcantara, 2008, To treaty or not to treaty? Aboriginal peoples and comprehensive land claims negotiations in Canada, Publius, 38, 343, 10.1093/publius/pjm036 · DOI
  3. Alexander, Jeffrey C., 1992. Citizen and enemy as symbolic classification: on the polarizing discourse of civil society. In: Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, pp. 289–308.
  4. Alexander, 2000, Theorizing the good society: hermeneutic, normative and empirical discourses, Can. J. Sociol., 25, 271, 10.2307/3341644 · DOI
  5. Basok, 2013, Reproducing deportability: migrant agricultural workers in South-Western Ontario, J. Ethnic Migrat. Stud., 40, 1394, 10.1080/1369183X.2013.849566 · DOI
  6. Binford, 2009, From fields of power to fields of sweat: the dual process of constructing temporary migrant labour in Mexico and Canada, Third World Quart., 30, 503, 10.1080/01436590902742297 · DOI
  7. Brons, 2015, Othering, an analysis, Transcience, 6, 69
  8. Burnett, 2015, Settling the table: northern food subsidy programs and the (re)colonisation of indigenous bodies, Crit. Race Whiteness Stud., 11, 1
  9. Burton, 2004, Seeing through the ‘good farmer’s’ eyes: towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behaviour, Sociol. Ruralis, 44, 195, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00270.x · DOI
  10. Cavanagh, 2013, Editors statement, Settler Colonial Stud., 3, 1, 10.1080/18380743.2013.768169 · DOI
  11. Connell, 1998, Masculinities and globalization, Men Masculinit., 1, 3, 10.1177/1097184X98001001001 · DOI
  12. Connell, 2001, Understanding men: gender sociology and the new international research on masculinities, Soc. Thought Res., 24, 13
  13. Desmarais, Annette Aurélie, Wittman, Hannah, 2014. Farmers, foodies and first nations: getting to food sovereignty in Canada. J. Peas. Stud. 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.876623. New Haven: Yale University. · DOI
  14. Dhamoon, 2015, A feminist approach to decolonizing anti-racism: rethinking transnationalism, intersectionality, and settler colonialism, Feral Femin., 4, 20
  15. DiAngelo, 2011, White fragility, Int. J. Crit. Pedag., 3, 54
  16. Friedmann, 1978, World market, state, and family farm: social bases of household production in the era of wage labor, Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist., 20, 545, 10.1017/S001041750001255X · DOI
  17. Friedmann, 2005, Feeding the empire, Social. Register, 124
  18. Goldberg, 2009, Racial comparisons, relational racisms: some thoughts on method, Ethnic Racial Stud., 32, 1271, 10.1080/01419870902999233 · DOI
  19. Grez, 2006, Justice for migrant farm workers: reflections on the importance of community organising, Migration, July/August, 23
  20. Guthman, 2008, Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California, Geoforum, 39, 1171, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.002 · DOI
  21. Guthman, 2012, Doing justice to bodies? Reflections on food justice, race, and biology, Antipode, 46, no
  22. Hall, Derek, 2013. Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession and the global land grab. Third World Quart. 34(9), 1582–1604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.843854. Routledge. · DOI
  23. Harris, 2004, How did colonialism dispossess? Comments from an edge of empire, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 94, 165, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401009.x · DOI
  24. Harvey, 2004, The ‘new’ imperialism: accumulation by dispossession, Social. Register, 40
  25. Holtslander, 2015, Losing our grip: 2015 update, National Farmers Union, 36
  26. Lawrence, 2005, Decolonizing antiracism, Soc. Justice, 32, 120
  27. Magnan, 2012, New avenues of farm corporatization in the prairie grains sector: farm family entrepreneurs and the case of one earth farms, Agric. Hum. Values, 29, 161, 10.1007/s10460-011-9327-9 · DOI
  28. McCrossan, 2015, Contaminating and collapsing indigenous space: judicial narratives of Canadian territoriality, Settler Colonial Stud., 5, 20, 10.1080/2201473X.2014.925609 · DOI
  29. Morgensen, 2011, The biopolitics of settler colonialism: right here, right now, Settler Colonial Stud., 1, 52, 10.1080/2201473X.2011.10648801 · DOI
  30. Nelson, 2014, A German on the prairies: max sering and settler colonialism in Canada, Settler Colonial Stud., 5, 1, 10.1080/2201473X.2014.899551 · DOI
  31. Peluso, 2011, New frontiers of land control: introduction, J. Peas. Stud., 38, 667, 10.1080/03066150.2011.607692 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Perry, 2012, Barely legal: racism and migrant farm labour in the context of Canadian multiculturalism, Citizsh. Stud., 16, 189, 10.1080/13621025.2012.667611 · DOI
  33. Pini, 2004, Managerial masculinities in the Australian sugar industry, Rural Soc., 14, 22, 10.5172/rsj.351.14.1.22 · DOI
  34. Preibisch, 2007, Local produce, foreign labor: labor mobility programs and global trade competitiveness in Canada, Rural Sociol., 72, 418, 10.1526/003601107781799308 · DOI
  35. Preibisch, 2010, Pick-your-own labor: migrant workers and flexibility in Canadian agriculture, Int. Migrat. Rev., 44, 404, 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00811.x · DOI
  36. Reaman, 1970, vol. 2
  37. Rossiter, 2005, Fantastic topographies: neo-liberal responses to aboriginal land claims in British Columbia, Can. Geogr., 49, 352, 10.1111/j.0008-3658.2005.00101.x · DOI
  38. Saldanha, 2006, Reontologising race: the machinic geography of phenotype, Environ. Plan. D: Soc. Space, 24, 9, 10.1068/d61j · DOI
  39. Saldanha, 2011, The concept of race, Geography, 96, 27, 10.1080/00167487.2011.12094306 · DOI
  40. Simpson, 2003, Toxic contamination undermining indigenous food systems and indigenous sovereignty, Pimatziwin: J. Indig. Commun. Health, 1, 130
  41. Smith, 2010, Indigeneity, settler colonialism, white supremacy, Glob. Dialogue, 12, 1
  42. Statistics Canada, 2011. 2011 Census of Agriculture. Ottawa. · DOI
  43. Steckley, Marylynn, 2016. Why ‘race’ matters in struggles for food sovereignty: experiences from Haiti. Geoforum 72, 26–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.03.009. Elsevier Ltd. · DOI
  44. Stock, 2014, Farmer autonomy and the farming self, J. Rural Stud., 36, 160, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.07.004 · DOI
  45. Sutherland, 2011, Good farmers, good neighbours? The role of cultural capital in social capital development in a Scottish farming community, Sociol. Ruralis, 51, 238, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00536.x · DOI
  46. Thobani, 2007, vol. 53
  47. Troughton, 1989, The role of marketing boards in the industrialization of the Canadian agricultural system, J. Rural Stud., 5, 367, 10.1016/0743-0167(89)90063-6 · DOI
  48. Tuck, 2012, Decolonization is not a metaphor, Decolonizat.: Indigeneity Educ. Soc., 1, 1
  49. Veracini, 2008, Settler collective, founding violence and disavowal: the settler colonial situation, J. Intercult. Stud., 29, 363, 10.1080/07256860802372246 · DOI
  50. Veracini, 2011, On settlerness, Borderlands, 10
  51. Wolfe, 2001, Land, labour and difference: elementary structures of race, Am. Hist. Rev., 106, 866, 10.2307/2692330 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rotz, S.
Venue
Geoforum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
82
Pages
158-169
ISSN
0016-7185
Cited by
51
References
2
Language
en
Funders
Canadian Vanier Graduate Scholarship program

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review