The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models
Abstract
We present a landslide susceptibility model for the Collazzone area, central Italy, and we propose a framework for evaluating the model reliability and prediction skill. The landslide susceptibility model was obtained through discriminant analysis of 46 thematic environmental variables and using the presence of shallow landslides obtained from a multi-temporal inventory map as the dependent variable for statistical analysis. By comparing the number of correctly and incorrectly classified mapping units, it is established that the model classifies 77.0% of 894 mapping units correctly. Model fitting performance is investigated by comparing the proportion of the study area in each probability class with the corresponding proportion of landslide area. We then prepare an ensemble of 350 landslide susceptibility models using the same landslide and thematic information but different numbers of mapping units. This ensemble is exploited to investigate the model reliability, including the role of the thematic variables used to construct the model, and the model sensitivity to changes in the input data. By studying the variation of the model's susceptibility estimate, the error associated with the susceptibility assessment for each mapping unit is determined. This result is shown on a map that complements the landslide susceptibility map. Prediction skill of the susceptibility model is then estimated by comparing the forecast with two recent event inventory maps. The susceptibility model is found capable of predicting the newly triggered landslides. A general framework for testing a susceptibility model is proposed, including a scheme for ranking the quality of the susceptibility assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Cohen, J. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000104 · Cited by 42,398
THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS
FISHER, R. A. (1936) · Annals of Eugenics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x · Cited by 15,227
Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification
Fulkerson, B. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10484383 · Cited by 2,209
Cruden, D. M. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,906
Landslides : investigation and mitigation
Turner, A. K., & Schuster, R. L. (1996) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 1,501
Landslide hazard zonation: A review of principles and practice
Varnes, D. J. (1984) · Cited by 1,368
Forecast Verification: A Practitioner's Guide in Atmospheric Science
(2011) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119960003 · Cited by 1,267
Gis Technology in Mapping Landslide Hazard
Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F., & Reichenbach, P. (1995) · Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8404-3_8 · Cited by 574
Self-citationMultivariate models for landslide hazard evaluation
Carrara, A. (1983) · Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology · doi:10.1007/bf01031290 · Cited by 515
Applied Multivariate Statistics in Geohydrology and Related Sciences
Brown, C. E. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-80328-4 · Cited by 411
Liu, H. (1996) · ACM SIGART Bulletin · doi:10.1145/230062.1066049 · Cited by 369
Lee, E. M., & Jones, D. K. C. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203749524 · Cited by 366
Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity
Hoehler, F. K. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00174-2 · Cited by 288
Lee, E. M., & Jones, D. K. C. (2004) · doi:10.1680/lra.31715 · Cited by 211
Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard
Carrara, A., Crosta, G., & Frattini, P. (2003) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.545 · Cited by 194
Gorsevski, P. V., Gessler, P. E., & Jankowski, P. L. (2003) · Journal of Geographical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10109-003-0113-0 · Cited by 172
Wilks, D. S. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815823-4.00009-2 · Cited by 85
Cited by
A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models
Reichenbach, P., Rossi, M., Malamud, B. D., Mihir, M., & Guzzetti, F. (2018) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 · Cited by 2,347
Self-citationLandslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem
Guzzetti, F., Mondini, A. C., Cardinali, M., Fiorucci, F., Santangelo, M., & Chang, K.-T. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.001 · Cited by 2,092
Self-citationTien Bui, D., Tuan, T. A., Klempe, H., Pradhan, B., & Revhaug, I. (2016) · Landslides · doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6 · Cited by 1,253
Yao, X., Tham, L. G., & Dai, F. C. (2008) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.02.011 · Cited by 600
Comparing landslide inventory maps
Galli, M., Ardizzone, F., Cardinali, M., Guzzetti, F., & Reichenbach, P. (2008) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.09.023 · Cited by 580
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Guzzetti, F., Reichenbach, P., Ardizzone, F., Cardinali, M., & Galli, M.
- Venue
- Geomorphology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 166-184
- ISSN
- 0169-555X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988650824
- Cited by
- 935
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 49.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
