Cited by 22Technology Use by Older AdultsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feasibility of mobile mental wellness training for older adults

Abstract

Mobile technology has been increasingly adopted in promotion of mental health among older people. This study assessed the feasibility of a mobile mental wellness training application for individual use and for group work from the perspectives of older adults and social care professionals. The older individuals recruited for the study were participants in a Circle of Friends group and family caregivers' peer support group offered by the communal senior services. The qualitative and quantitative results of interviews, questionnaires, observation, and application usage were reported. Seven older adults started using the application independently at home in parallel with the group activity. This study revealed new information regarding the barriers to the older adults' full adoption of such mobile technologies. The results indicated that there may be potential in the incorporation of mobile technologies in promotion of mental health of older people at group settings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.02.001

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fletcher, 2015, Mobile health: Barriers to mobile phone use in the aging population, Online J Nurs Inform, 19

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Similä, H., Immonen, M., Toska-Tervola, J., Enwald, H., Keränen, N., Kangas, M., Jämsä, T., & Korpelainen, R.
Affiliations
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
  • Åbo Akademi University (FI)
  • Oulu University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Similä, Heidi
Venue
Geriatric Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
499-505
ISSN
0197-4572 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789715721
Cited by
22
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geriatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
Tekes – the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
older adults, mental health promotion, mobile health apps, feasibility, social care workers, peer support groups, family caregivers, Circle of Friends, technology adoption barriers
MeSH terms
Aged, Depression, Female, Group Processes, Health Promotion, Humans, Mental Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review