The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways?
Open accessAbstract
Agriculture 4.0 is comprised of different already operational or developing technologies such as robotics, nanotechnology, synthetic protein, cellular agriculture, gene editing technology, artificial intelligence, blockchain, and machine learning, which may have pervasive effects on future agriculture and food systems and major transformative potential. These technologies underpin concepts such as vertical farming and food systems, digital agriculture, bioeconomy, circular agriculture, and aquaponics. In this perspective paper, we argue that more attention is needed for the inclusion and exclusion effects of Agriculture 4.0 technologies, and for reflection on how they relate to diverse transition pathways towards sustainable agricultural and food systems driven by mission-oriented innovation systems. This would require processes of responsible innovation, anticipating the potential impacts of Agriculture 4.0 through inclusive processes, and reflecting on and being responsive to emerging effects and where needed adjusting the direction and course of transition pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
Rotz, S., Gravely, E., Mosby, I., Duncan, E., Finnis, E., Horgan, M., LeBlanc, J., Martin, R., Neufeld, H. T., Nixon, A., et al. (2019) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023 · Cited by 557
Financialization, distance and global food politics
Clapp, J. (2014) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2013.875536 · Cited by 469
Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security
Garibaldi, L. A., Gemmill-Herren, B., D’Annolfo, R., Graeub, B. E., Cunningham, S. A., & Breeze, T. D. (2017) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.001 · Cited by 380
Emerging patterns of complex technological innovation
Kash, D. E., & Rycroft, R. (2002) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/s0040-1625(01)00171-8 · Cited by 121
Cited by
Current status and future challenges in implementing and upscaling vertical farming systems
van Delden, S. H., SharathKumar, M., Butturini, M., Graamans, L. J. A., Heuvelink, E., Kacira, M., Kaiser, E., Klamer, R. S., Klerkx, L., Kootstra, G., et al. (2021) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00402-w · Cited by 544
Self-citationParmentola, A., Petrillo, A., Tutore, I., & De Felice, F. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2882 · Cited by 429
Kumar, S., Raut, R. D., Nayal, K., Kraus, S., Yadav, V. S., & Narkhede, B. E. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126023 · Cited by 412
Lajoie-O'Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S., & Klerkx, L. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183 · Cited by 390
Self-citationKlerkx, L., & Begemann, S. (2020) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901 · Cited by 354
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Klerkx, L., & Rose, D.
- Venue
- Global Food Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 100347
- ISSN
- 2211-9124 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2995631322
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 36.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347
- The paper
- Klerkx, L., & Rose, D. (2020). Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? Global Food Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
