Cited by 380Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesPlant and soil sciences

Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security

Open access
Garibaldi, Lucas A., Gemmill-Herren, Barbara, D’Annolfo, Raffaele, Graeub, Benjamin E., Cunningham, Saul A., Breeze, Tom D.·2017·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Scientists and policy-makers globally are calling for alternative approaches to conventional intensification of agriculture that enhance ecosystem services provided by biodiversity. The evidence reviewed here suggests that alternative approaches can achieve high crop yields and profits, but the performance of other socioeconomic indicators (as well as long-term trends) is surprisingly poorly documented. Consequently, the implementation of conventional intensification and the discussion of alternative approaches are not based on quantitative evidence of their simultaneous ecological and socioeconomic impacts across the globe. To close this knowledge gap, we propose a participatory assessment framework. Given the impacts of conventional intensification on biodiversity loss and greenhouse gas emissions, such evidence is urgently needed to direct science-policy initiatives, such as the United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.001

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Too often organic practices or environmental sustainability in agricultural production are prioritized at the cost of human and social aspects of food systems, resulting in barriers for disadvantaged consumers who cannot access, afford, nor identify with food from alternative agri-food systems.

    “Too often organic practices or environmental sustainability in an agricultural production system are prioritized at the cost of the human and social aspects of food systems [4], resulting in barriers for disadvantaged consumers who cannot access, afford, nor identify with food from these alternative agri-food systems [4,5].”

    From Agroecological Transition: A Territorial Examination of the Simultaneity of Limited Farmer Livelihoods and Food Insecurity (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garibaldi, L. A., Gemmill-Herren, B., D’Annolfo, R., Graeub, B. E., Cunningham, S. A., & Breeze, T. D.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Biovision – Foundation for Ecological Development (CH)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Garibaldi, Lucas A.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
68-80
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2533630581
Cited by
380
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 19
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (40-B-399, PI 40-B-399)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
Keywords
agricultural intensification, biodiversity conservation, food security, livelihoods, ecosystem services, socio-economic impacts, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity loss, sustainable development, crop yield, science-policy interface
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Food Supply, Ecosystem, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review