Cited by 429Blockchain Technology Applications and SecuritySustainable Supply Chain ManagementBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

Is blockchain able to enhance environmental sustainability? A systematic review and research agenda from the perspective of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Open access
Parmentola, Adele, Petrillo, Antonella, Tutore, Ilaria, De Felice, Fabio·2022·Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract

Abstract Blockchain is a disruptive technology that is revolutionizing information technology and represents a change of cultural paradigm for the way in which information is shared. Companies are rushing to understand how they can use blockchain distributed ledger technology to innovate processes, products and transactions. In a globalized world where environmental sustainability is a critical success factor, what is the role of the blockchain? By using a systematic review approach and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, this study attempts to identify whether and how blockchain technology is considered able to affect environmental sustainability. Findings from 195 studies from 2015 to 2020 were analysed after the search protocol was applied. The results indicate that blockchain technology could contribute to environmentally sustainable development goals (SDGs) from different points of view, such as supporting the realization of a sustainable supply chain, improving energy efficiency and promoting the creation of secure and reliable smart cities. Furthermore, the investigation highlights the sectors where to focus research investments, providing a way to reward sustainable behaviour and increasing environmental sustainability. On the other hand, blockchain has no negligible negative effects on the environment that need to be considered before adoption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bse.2882

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parmentola, A., Petrillo, A., Tutore, I., & De Felice, F.
Affiliations
  • Parthenope University of Naples (IT)
  • Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering University of Cassino and Southern Lazio Cassino Italy
Corresponding author
Parmentola, Adele
Venue
Business Strategy and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-09-14
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
194-217
ISSN
  • 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0836
OpenAlex
W3200673721
Cited by
429
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 2
FWCI
9.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Business Strategy and the Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (Parthenope University of Naples) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, environmental sustainability, Sustainable Development Goals, distributed ledger technology, supply chain sustainability, energy efficiency, smart cities, environmental impact of blockchain, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review