Cited by 68Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detection

Quantitative assessment of mucosal architecture using computer-based analysis of confocal laser endomicroscopy in inflammatory bowel diseases

Open access
Quénéhervé, Lucille, David, Grégoire, Bourreille, Arnaud, Hardouin, Jean Benoît, Rahmi, Gabriel, Neunlist, Michel, Brégeon, Jérémy, Coron, Emmanuel·2019·Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) might discriminate mucosal lesions between Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the analysis of CLE images requires time-consuming methods, a long training time, and potential impediments, such as significant interobserver variability. Therefore, we developed a computer-based method to analyze mucosal architecture from CLE images and discriminate between healthy subjects and patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as well as between UC and CD patients. METHODS: We retrospectively screened patients who had undergone CLE either for an evaluation of IBD in remission or for colorectal cancer screening (control subjects) between 2009 and 2016. We assessed 14 morphologic and functional parameters in each CLE recording from 23 CD patients, 27 UC patients, and 9 control patients. Next, we constructed 2 scores, 1 for the IBD diagnosis and 1 for the differential diagnosis between UC and CD. RESULTS: In IBD patients, the mean intercrypt distance, wall thickness, and fluorescein leakage through the colonic mucosa were significantly increased compared with control patients by 155%, 188%, and 297%, respectively (P < .05). In UC patients, the same parameters were significantly increased by 109%, 117%, and 174%, respectively (P < .05), compared with CD patients. IBD diagnosis had 100% (95%CI, 93%; 100%) sensitivity and 100% (95%CI, 66%; 100%) specificity. IBD differential diagnosis provided discrimination of UC from CD patients with 92% (95%CI, 75%; 99%) sensitivity and 91% (95%CI, 72%; 99%) specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Confirming these results using prospective validation cohorts can substantiate that computer-based analysis of CLE images may provide new biomarkers for the diagnosis and characterization of IBD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.006

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several AI algorithms have been developed to accurately grade disease activity across various endoscopic scoring systems in ulcerative colitis (UC), showing excellent diagnostic performance and strong concordance with experts.

    “Recently, several AI algorithms have been developed to accurately grade disease activity across various endoscopic scoring systems in ulcerative colitis (UC) to overcome these limitations, showing excellent diagnostic performance and strong concordance with experts.13-23”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quénéhervé, L., David, G., Bourreille, A., Hardouin, J. B., Rahmi, G., Neunlist, M., Brégeon, J., & Coron, E.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
Corresponding author
Coron, Emmanuel
Venue
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
626-636
ISSN
0016-5107 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886782721
Cited by
68
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
confocal laser endomicroscopy, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, computer-based image analysis, mucosal architecture, differential diagnosis, fluorescein leakage, colorectal cancer screening
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aftercare, Aged, Colitis, Ulcerative, Colon, Colonoscopy, Contrast Media, Crohn Disease, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Middle Aged, Permeability, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Colorectal Neoplasms, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Microscopy, Confocal, Fluorescein, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review