Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,545

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complications of Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy

Open access
Freeman, Martin L., Nelson, Douglas B., Sherman, Stuart, Haber, Gregory B., Herman, Mary E., Dorsher, Paul J., Moore, Joseph P., Fennerty, M. Brian, Ryan, Michael E., Shaw, Michael J., Lande, Jeffrey D., Pheley, Alfred M.·1996·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy is commonly used to remove bile-duct stones and to treat other problems. We prospectively investigated risk factors for complications of this procedure and their outcomes. METHODS: We studied complications that occurred within 30 days of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy in consecutive patients treated at 17 institutions in the United States and Canada from 1992 through 1994. RESULTS: Of 2347 patients, 229 (9.8 percent) had a complication, including pancreatitis in 127 (5.4 percent) and hemorrhage in 48 (2.0 Percent). There were 55 deaths from all causes within 30 days; death was directly or indirectly related to the procedure in 10 cases. Of five significant risk factors for complications identified in a multivariate analysis, two were characteristics of the patients (suspected dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi as an indication for the procedure and the presence of cirrhosis) and three were related to the endoscopic technique (difficulty in cannulating the bile duct achievement of access to the bile duct by "precut" sphincterotomy, and use of a combined percutaneous-endoscopic procedure). The overall risk of complications was not related to the patient's age, the number of coexisting illnesses, or the diameter of the bile duct. The rate of complications was highest when the indication for the procedure was suspected dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi (21.7 percent) and lowest when the indication was removal of bile-duct stones within 30 days of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4.9 percent). As compared with those who performed fewer procedures, endoscopists who performed more than one sphincterotomy per week had lower rates of all complications (8.4 percent vs. 11.1 percent, P=0.03) and severe complications (0.9 percent vs. 2.3 percent, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of complications after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy can vary widely in different circumstances and is primarily related to the indication for the procedure and to endoscopic technique, rather than to the age or general medical condition of the patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199609263351301

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 2,545

Metadata

Authors
Freeman, M. L., Nelson, D. B., Sherman, S., Haber, G. B., Herman, M. E., Dorsher, P. J., Moore, J. P., Fennerty, M. B., Ryan, M. E., Shaw, M. J., Lande, J. D., & Pheley, A. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1996-09-26
Volume
335
Issue
13
Pages
909-919
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2320210611
Cited by
2,545
References
2
FWCI
61.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complications of Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199609263351301
The paper
Freeman, M. L., Nelson, D. B., Sherman, S., Haber, G. B., Herman, M. E., Dorsher, P. J., Moore, J. P., Fennerty, M. B., Ryan, M. E., Shaw, M. J., Lande, J. D., & Pheley, A. M. (1996). Complications of Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199609263351301

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.