The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981
Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00168 · Cited by 964
Days and Nights on the Internet: The Impact of a Diffusing Technology
Howard, P. E. N., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027640121957259 · Cited by 258
Cited by
The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015) · Communication and Information Technologies Annual · doi:10.1108/s2050-206020150000010002 · Cited by 1,022
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.04.005 · Cited by 288
Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion
Busch, P. A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2018) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-170050 · Cited by 267
The impact of using algorithms for managerial decisions on public employees' procedural justice
Nagtegaal, R. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101536 · Cited by 166
Impact of the digital divide on e-government: Expanding from channel choice to channel usage
Ebbers, W. E., Jansen, M. G. M., & van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.007 · Cited by 152
Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2022) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439320980434 · Cited by 139
Taipale, S. (2013) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2012.05.005 · Cited by 125
Reddick, C., & Anthopoulos, L. (2014) · Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/tg-01-2014-0001 · Cited by 87
Self-citationJansson, G., & Erlingsson, G. Ó. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.908155 · Cited by 66
Automating the Public Sector and Organizing Accountabilities
Smith, M. L., Noorman, M. E., & Martin, A. K. (2010) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.02601 · Cited by 51
Existe-t-il une fracture numérique dans l'usage de l'administration en ligne ?
Bacache-Beauvallet, M., Bounie, D., & François, A. (2011) · Revue économique · doi:10.3917/reco.622.0215 · Cited by 27
The digital divide and e-government services
Hall, T. E., & Owens, J. (2011) · Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance · doi:10.1145/2072069.2072076 · Cited by 27
One Step Forward and Two Steps Back: E-government Policies in Practice
Henriksen, H. Z. (2018) · Public Administration and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61762-6_4 · Cited by 25
Al-Emadi, A., & Anouze, A. L. (2018) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/ijegr.2018010102 · Cited by 19
Research on digital discretion—The subjectification of street‐level work in public administration
Johansson, J. (2025) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12637 · Cited by 26
Laenens, W., Van den Broeck, W., & Mariën, I. (2018) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v6i4.1652 · Cited by 17
Gerpott, T. J., & Ahmadi, N. (2016) · Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/tg-05-2016-0025 · Cited by 9
(2014) · Electronic Journal of e-Government · Cited by 9
Hierarchical Order of User Preference Parameters in Adopting M-government Services
Faculty of Technology Management and Business, U. T. H. O. M., Rashed Mohammed Alneyadi, R. H., Abdul Hamid, N. A., & Faculty of Technology Management and Business, U. T. H. O. M. (2021) · International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology · doi:10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.05.022 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddick, C. G.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-57
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002826359
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 53.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
